Literature DB >> 25694928

Foreword, Percutaneous and Endoscopic MIS Special Issue.

Anthony T Yeung1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25694928      PMCID: PMC4325496          DOI: 10.14444/1014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


× No keyword cloud information.
This special issue contains articles from authors that present their extensive level 3, 4, and 5 EBM experience treating back pain and sciatica. The authors either focus on the physiologic and anatomic source of pain, the methods used for “surgical pain management,” or provide information on MIS surgical “pearls” on existing MIS surgical techniques. These articles may be considered “controversial” by those who do not believe or use these techniques because it does not follow their conventional wisdom of established “gold standards” adopted by the old standards of open surgery by traditional surgeons. Traditional thinking focuses on relieving compression, correcting deformity, or stabilizing the instability from an aging or injured spine and addressing the condition with the state of the art correction of a deformity to an ideal anatomic condition. The world, however, has adapted to a myriad of nonsurgical treatments that provide quick enough relief that patients flock to these forms of treatment in order to avoid the open, more invasive surgical treatment. MIS interventionalist surgeons use these alternative treatments to reduce their patient's debilitating pain, even if temporarily, waiting for natural history, even years, to provide more lasting pain relief. Treatment utilizing minimally invasive surgery and treatments of a non surgical nature is best delivered in a multi-disciplinary collegial environment of practioners, each with their area of expertise working together in a non-competitive financial environment focused on the individual needs of each individual patient. Treatment will then be a shared decision, along with the costs of each treatment. With surgical treatment, the technical aspects may have great variability that depends on a critical surgeon factor where each surgeon will have a different set of skills, augmented by their surgical volume, technical skills, and experience, “the surgeon factor.” It may be difficult in our current environment where payors and institutions are dictating the type of care available by just focusing on managing costs, rather than managing care, sometimes under the guise of “evidence based medicine.” This phrase, while appropriate and should be used as a guide, is now used for managing cost, not just care. In the long run, managing care designed for each individual patient in a collegial and cooperative environment will prove to be the most cost effective and beneficial model. This model has been set up at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine. I invite the readers to read each article with an open mind, cover- to- cover to appreciate some of the lesser known, but effective diagnostic and therapeutic treatment methods that offer relief to your patients with acute and chronic back pain and sciatica from injury or from an aging spine. These articles were accepted only after vigorous blinded reviews by recognized experts in their fields.
  2 in total

1.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Pain, Disability, and Complication Rate-A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Guilherme Meyer; Ivan Dias DA Rocha; Alexandre Fogaça Cristante; Raphael Martus Marcon; Thiago Pereira Coutinho; Alessandro Gonzalez Torelli; Pedro Araujo Petersen; Olavo Biraghi Letaif; Tarcísio Eloy Pessoa DE Barros Filho
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-02-29

2.  The percutaneous spinal endoscopy "isolation zone" technique for discogenic low back pain: a case series study.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Lingxia Li; Cai Cheng; Yuan Xue
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.981

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.