| Literature DB >> 25694669 |
Marlène Finck1, Frédérique Ponce1, Laurent Guilbaud1, Cindy Chervier1, Franck Floch1, Jean-Luc Cadoré1, Thomas Chuzel1, Marine Hugonnard1.
Abstract
There are no evidence-based guidelines as to whether computed tomography (CT) or endoscopy should be selected as the first-line procedure when a nasal tumor is suspected in a dog or a cat and only one examination can be performed. Computed tomography and rhinoscopic features of 17 dogs and 5 cats with a histopathologically or cytologically confirmed nasal tumor were retrospectively reviewed. The level of suspicion for nasal neoplasia after CT and/or rhinoscopy was compared to the definitive diagnosis. Twelve animals underwent CT, 14 underwent rhinoscopy, and 4 both examinations. Of the 12 CT examinations performed, 11 (92%) resulted in the conclusion that a nasal tumor was the most likely diagnosis compared with 9/14 (64%) for rhinoscopies. Computed tomography appeared to be more reliable than rhinoscopy for detecting nasal tumors and should therefore be considered as the first-line procedure.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25694669 PMCID: PMC4298272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can Vet J ISSN: 0008-5286 Impact factor: 1.008