Literature DB >> 25694538

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: considerations on once- vs. twice-daily regimens and their potential impact on medication adherence.

Bernard Vrijens1, Hein Heidbuchel2.   

Abstract

Suboptimal medication adherence is a widespread problem in ambulatory care of chronic diseases, with deviations in either direction from the prescribed dosing regimen. For the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), such deviations occur and can lead to bleeding or clotting, as suboptimal adherence involves temporary periods of either overdosing or underdosing. In this expert review, we discuss: (a) the proper definition of adherence in terms of its three elements: initiation, implementation, and discontinuation; (b) how adherence is reliably and accurately measured and (c) successfully enhanced, to achieve and maintain safe and effective levels of NOAC-based anticoagulation. We also discuss the comparative effects of prescribing the same total daily dose, given either once-daily or as half-strength twice-daily doses. Because NOACs have plasma half-lives of ∼12 h, the twice-daily dosing regimen is less prone than the once-daily dosing regimen to hazardously high peaks or hazardously low troughs in anticoagulant concentrations and associated actions. As in other fields of oral drug treatment, the continuity of drug action is greater with twice-daily than with once-daily dosing, despite the fact that a few more doses are skipped with twice-daily than with once-daily dosing. This paradox is explained by the disproportionately greater impact on drug action of skipping a once-daily than a twice-daily dose. Integration of these principles into real-world medication management is the next step in the improvement of oral anticoagulation. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulation; Atrial fibrillation; Compliance; Dosing regimens; Medication adherence; Monitoring; New oral anticoagulants; Stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25694538     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  35 in total

1.  Underuse of Anticoagulation in Older Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and CHADS2 Score ≥ 2: Are We Doing Better Since the Marketing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants?

Authors:  Séverine Henrard; Caroline Vandenabeele; Sophie Marien; Benoit Boland; Olivia Dalleur
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Quality of direct oral anticoagulant therapy in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Mehmet Agirbasli
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  A scoping review of studies comparing the medication event monitoring system (MEMS) with alternative methods for measuring medication adherence.

Authors:  Mohamed El Alili; Bernard Vrijens; Jenny Demonceau; Silvia M Evers; Mickael Hiligsmann
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation - The Use of NOACs in Everyday Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Gheorghe-Andrei Dan; Adrian Catalin Buzea
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2015-12

Review 5.  Impact of direct oral anticoagulant off-label doses on clinical outcomes of atrial fibrillation patients: A systematic review.

Authors:  Joana Santos; Natália António; Marília Rocha; Ana Fortuna
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Comparison of Anti-factor Xa Activity Among Three Different Factor Xa Inhibitors in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Renal Impairment.

Authors:  Akihiro Tobe; Hiroyuki Osanai; Akihito Tanaka; Teruhiro Sakaguchi; Takahiro Kambara; Yoshihito Nakashima; Hiroshi Asano; Hideki Ishii; Masayoshi Ajioka; Toyoaki Murohara
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 7.  Dabigatran etexilate: appropriate use in patients with chronic kidney disease and in the elderly patients.

Authors:  Mauro Molteni; Mario Bo; Giovanni Di Minno; Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Simonetta Genovesi; Danilo Toni; Paolo Verdecchia
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  Comparison of treatment persistence with different oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Tomas Forslund; Björn Wettermark; Paul Hjemdahl
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Apixaban: A Review in Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Sarah L Greig; Karly P Garnock-Jones
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Individualising Anticoagulant Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Patients.

Authors:  Marco Alings
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.