Literature DB >> 25694417

Lapatinib versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as second-line treatment in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-amplified metastatic gastro-oesophageal cancer: a randomised phase II trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie.

Sylvie Lorenzen1, Jorge Riera Knorrenschild2, Georg-Martin Haag3, Michael Pohl4, Peter Thuss-Patience5, Florian Bassermann1, Ulrike Helbig6, Florian Weißinger7, Elisabeth Schnoy8, Klaus Becker9, Gertraud Stocker10, Josef Rüschoff11, Andreas Eisenmenger12, Irini Karapanagiotou-Schenkel12, Florian Lordick13.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification is present in a subgroup of gastroo-esophageal cancers (GCs). HER2 inhibition with trastuzumab has shown to improve outcomes in advanced disease. Lapatinib ditosylate (LAP), a dual anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anti-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with preclinical activity against GC, has been approved in HER2-positive breast cancer. We aimed to study the activity of LAP in HER2-amplified GC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (pts) with HER2-positive (gene amplification or increased copy numbers based on predefined criteria) advanced GC were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive LAP 1250mg per day 1-21 plus capecitabine (CAP) 2000mg/m(2) on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle or LAP 1500mg monotherapy day 1-21 after having failed on a platinum-based first-line therapy. HER2 status was assessed centrally. The primary end-point was the objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1). We aimed to include 38 pts per arm to show an interesting response rate of ⩾20% in either of the two arms.
RESULTS: 37 pts were enrolled (18 to LAP+CAP, 19 to LAP). Pts had received a median of three prior treatment lines. 12 pts in the LAP+CAP group (67%) and 12 pts in the LAP group (63%) had received prior trastuzumab. Only two pts (11.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.37-34.7), both in the LAP+CAP arm, achieved an objective response. The study was closed prematurely for futility. Median time to progression was 42 (95% CI: 38-61) days in the LAP group and 83 (95% CI: 42-86) days in the LAP+CAP group. Other secondary efficacy end-points (progression-free and overall survival) were comparable in the two treatment groups. Rates of diarrhoea were higher with LAP+CAP (61%; 95% CI: 35-83) compared to 26% (95% CI 9-51) with LAP mono, whereas other adverse events were mostly similar between the groups (18 [100%] versus 17 [90%]). DISCUSSION: Lapatinib showed insufficient activity in HER2-amplified pretreated advanced GC. The safety profile of LAP or LAP+CAP was as expected with some more toxicity in the combination arm. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT01145404).
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EGFR; Gastric cancer; HER2; Lapatinib

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25694417     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  26 in total

Review 1.  Palliative chemotherapy and targeted therapies for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Authors:  Vincent T Janmaat; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ate van der Gaast; Ron Hj Mathijssen; Marco J Bruno; Maikel P Peppelenbosch; Ernst J Kuipers; Manon Cw Spaander
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-28

Review 2.  Perspectives of HER2-targeting in gastric and esophageal cancer.

Authors:  James N Gerson; Sam Skariah; Crystal S Denlinger; Igor Astsaturov
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.206

Review 3.  Clinical impact of tumour biology in the management of gastroesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Florian Lordick; Yelena Y Janjigian
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  C-Met as a Molecular Marker for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Its Association with Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Ya-Ping Xu; Gang Lin; Xiao-Jiang Sun; Mao-Hui Yan; Gu Zhang; Jin-Lin Hu; Wen-Yong Sun; Jin-Ming Yu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 5.  Metastatic gastric cancer treatment: Second line and beyond.

Authors:  Marwan Ghosn; Samer Tabchi; Hampig Raphael Kourie; Mustapha Tehfe
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  [Novel pharmaceutical treatment approaches for gastric cancer].

Authors:  F Lordick
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  Phase II trial of dacomitinib in patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer.

Authors:  Do-Youn Oh; Kewn-Wook Lee; Jae Yong Cho; Won Ki Kang; Seock-Ah Im; Jin Won Kim; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Subcellular localization of EGFR in esophageal carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  Lucas Spohn; Christiane Fichter; Martin Werner; Silke Lassmann
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.782

9.  Comparative effectiveness and tolerability of targeted agents combined with chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive gastroesophageal cancer: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yin-Hong Yan; Xiao-Yi Lei; Wei-Ping Hu
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.214

10.  Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yoko Tomita; Max Moldovan; Rachael Chang Lee; Amy Hc Hsieh; Amanda Townsend; Timothy Price
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.