Literature DB >> 25693302

The effect of extended sensory range via the EyeCane sensory substitution device on the characteristics of visionless virtual navigation.

Shachar Maidenbaum, Shelly Levy-Tzedek, Daniel Robert Chebat, Rinat Namer-Furstenberg, Amir Amedi.   

Abstract

Mobility training programs for helping the blind navigate through unknown places with a White-Cane significantly improve their mobility. However, what is the effect of new assistive technologies, offering more information to the blind user, on the underlying premises of these programs such as navigation patterns? We developed the virtual-EyeCane, a minimalistic sensory substitution device translating single-point-distance into auditory cues identical to the EyeCane's in the real world. We compared performance in virtual environments when using the virtual-EyeCane, a virtual-White-Cane, no device and visual navigation. We show that the characteristics of virtual-EyeCane navigation differ from navigation with a virtual-White-Cane or no device, and that virtual-EyeCane users complete more levels successfully, taking shorter paths and with less collisions than these groups, and we demonstrate the relative similarity of virtual-EyeCane and visual navigation patterns. This suggests that additional distance information indeed changes navigation patterns from virtual-White-Cane use, and brings them closer to visual navigation.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25693302     DOI: 10.1163/22134808-00002463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multisens Res        ISSN: 2213-4794            Impact factor:   2.286


  8 in total

1.  Echoic Sensory Substitution Information in a Single Obstacle Circumvention Task.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Amy C Scarfe; Brian C J Moore; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Brian C J Moore; Pavel Zahorik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Brain-Machine Interfaces to Assist the Blind.

Authors:  Maurice Ptito; Maxime Bleau; Ismaël Djerourou; Samuel Paré; Fabien C Schneider; Daniel-Robert Chebat
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Effects of training and using an audio-tactile sensory substitution device on speech-in-noise understanding.

Authors:  K Cieśla; T Wolak; A Lorens; M Mentzel; H Skarżyński; A Amedi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Aging and Sensory Substitution in a Virtual Navigation Task.

Authors:  S Levy-Tzedek; S Maidenbaum; A Amedi; J Lackner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson; Alin Moldoveanu; Ómar I Jóhannesson; Oana Balan; Simone Spagnol; Vigdís Vala Valgeirsdóttir; Rúnar Unnthorsson
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Waist-up protection for blind individuals using the EyeCane as a primary and secondary mobility aid.

Authors:  Galit Buchs; Noa Simon; Shachar Maidenbaum; Amir Amedi
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 8.  Multisensory inclusive design with sensory substitution.

Authors:  Tayfun Lloyd-Esenkaya; Vanessa Lloyd-Esenkaya; Eamonn O'Neill; Michael J Proulx
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-08-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.