Literature DB >> 25693014

Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Marcelo B P Amato1, Maureen O Meade, Arthur S Slutsky, Laurent Brochard, Eduardo L V Costa, David A Schoenfeld, Thomas E Stewart, Matthias Briel, Daniel Talmor, Alain Mercat, Jean-Christophe M Richard, Carlos R R Carvalho, Roy G Brower.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mechanical-ventilation strategies that use lower end-inspiratory (plateau) airway pressures, lower tidal volumes (VT), and higher positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEPs) can improve survival in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the relative importance of each of these components is uncertain. Because respiratory-system compliance (CRS) is strongly related to the volume of aerated remaining functional lung during disease (termed functional lung size), we hypothesized that driving pressure (ΔP=VT/CRS), in which VT is intrinsically normalized to functional lung size (instead of predicted lung size in healthy persons), would be an index more strongly associated with survival than VT or PEEP in patients who are not actively breathing.
METHODS: Using a statistical tool known as multilevel mediation analysis to analyze individual data from 3562 patients with ARDS enrolled in nine previously reported randomized trials, we examined ΔP as an independent variable associated with survival. In the mediation analysis, we estimated the isolated effects of changes in ΔP resulting from randomized ventilator settings while minimizing confounding due to the baseline severity of lung disease.
RESULTS: Among ventilation variables, ΔP was most strongly associated with survival. A 1-SD increment in ΔP (approximately 7 cm of water) was associated with increased mortality (relative risk, 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31 to 1.51; P<0.001), even in patients receiving "protective" plateau pressures and VT (relative risk, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.58; P<0.001). Individual changes in VT or PEEP after randomization were not independently associated with survival; they were associated only if they were among the changes that led to reductions in ΔP (mediation effects of ΔP, P=0.004 and P=0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: We found that ΔP was the ventilation variable that best stratified risk. Decreases in ΔP owing to changes in ventilator settings were strongly associated with increased survival. (Funded by Fundação de Amparo e Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo and others.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25693014     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  579 in total

1.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome mimickers lacking common risk factors of the Berlin definition.

Authors:  Aude Gibelin; Antoine Parrot; Bernard Maitre; Christian Brun-Buisson; Armand Mekontso Dessap; Muriel Fartoukh; Nicolas de Prost
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Did studies on HFOV fail to improve ARDS survival because they did not decrease VILI? On the potential validity of a physiological concept enounced several decades ago.

Authors:  Didier Dreyfuss; Jean-Damien Ricard; Stéphane Gaudry
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Improve survival from prolonged mechanical ventilation: beginning with first step.

Authors:  Chun Pan; Haibo Qiu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Understanding recruitment maneuvers.

Authors:  Erica Aranha Suzumura; Marcelo Britto Passos Amato; Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Understanding lung protection.

Authors:  Rolf D Hubmayr; Sonal Pannu
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Does high-pressure, high-frequency oscillation shake the foundations of lung protection?

Authors:  John J Marini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Management of 1-Lung Ventilation-Variation and Trends in Clinical Practice: A Report From the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group.

Authors:  Douglas A Colquhoun; Bhiken I Naik; Marcel E Durieux; Amy M Shanks; Sachin Kheterpal; S Patrick Bender; Randal S Blank
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  A prospective international observational prevalence study on prone positioning of ARDS patients: the APRONET (ARDS Prone Position Network) study.

Authors:  C Guérin; P Beuret; J M Constantin; G Bellani; P Garcia-Olivares; O Roca; J H Meertens; P Azevedo Maia; T Becher; J Peterson; A Larsson; M Gurjar; Z Hajjej; F Kovari; A H Assiri; E Mainas; M S Hasan; D R Morocho-Tutillo; L Baboi; J M Chrétien; G François; L Ayzac; L Chen; L Brochard; A Mercat
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Association Between Tidal Volumes Adjusted for Ideal Body Weight and Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  David A Imber; Neal J Thomas; Nadir Yehya
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.624

10.  Potentially modifiable factors contributing to outcome from acute respiratory distress syndrome: the LUNG SAFE study.

Authors:  John G Laffey; Giacomo Bellani; Tài Pham; Eddy Fan; Fabiana Madotto; Ednan K Bajwa; Laurent Brochard; Kevin Clarkson; Andres Esteban; Luciano Gattinoni; Frank van Haren; Leo M Heunks; Kiyoyasu Kurahashi; Jon Henrik Laake; Anders Larsson; Daniel F McAuley; Lia McNamee; Nicolas Nin; Haibo Qiu; Marco Ranieri; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Hermann Wrigge; Arthur S Slutsky; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.