Literature DB >> 2569297

Is in vivo dissociation between the antipropulsive and antidiarrheal properties of opioids in rats related to gut selectivity?

A A Megens1, L L Canters, F H Awouters, C J Niemegeers.   

Abstract

The antipropulsive activity of a series of opioids in the charcoal test was compared with their antidiarrheal activity in the castor oil test and their analgesic activity in the tail withdrawal test. The obtained antipropulsive/antidiarrheal potency ratios varied from 0.71 to greater than 552 [pethidine (oral ED50's in mg/kg: 21.5/30.2), fentanyl (0.77/0.49), dextromoramide (5.39/2.90), methadone (14.2/6.38), codeine (98.4/10.8), morphine (56.6/5.21), diphenoxylate (8.15/0.54), nufenoxole (74.7/1.72), difenoxin (7.10/0.16), loperamide oxide (greater than 160/0.34) and loperamide (greater than 160/0.29)]. The above ratios correlated with the gut selectivity of the compounds as defined by their analgesic/antidiarrheal potency ratios (r = 0.92, P less than 0.001). Furthermore, inhibition of propulsion was found to correlate with central analgesic activity (r = 0.93, P less than 0.001) but not with protection from diarrhea (r = 0.023, P greater than 0.05). Indeed, gut-selective opioids such as loperamide and loperamide oxide failed to affect propulsion up to doses more than 450 times their antidiarrheal doses. In contrast, alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonists delayed propulsion at doses comparable to their antidiarrheal doses [clonidine (0.085 vs 0.021), lidamidine (2.35 vs 1.66)] and anticholinergics inhibited propulsion even at doses many times below their antidiarrheal doses [atropine (0.26 vs 9.30), dexetimide (0.13 vs 5.03) and isopropamide (0.78 vs 74.6)]. The present results indicate that the in vivo inhibition of gastrointestinal propulsion by opioids in rats is mediated by a central action. Effects on intestinal fluid transport or, alternatively, on motility events distal to the ileocecal junction rather than effects on propulsion through the small intestine, seem to be the primary mechanism of antidiarrheal action of gut-selective opioids such as loperamide and loperamide oxide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2569297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther        ISSN: 0003-9780


  4 in total

1.  Effects of the prodrug loperamide oxide, loperamide, and placebo on jejunal motor activity.

Authors:  G Stacher; H Steinringer; C Schneider; G V Vacariu-Granser; F Castiglione; G Gaupmann; U Weber; G Stacher-Janotta
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Racecadotril versus loperamide: antidiarrheal research revisited.

Authors:  S Huighebaert; F Awouters; G N J Tytgat
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Absorptive and motor components of the antidiarrhoeal action of loperamide: an in vivo study in pigs.

Authors:  V Théodorou; J Fioramonti; T Hachet; L Buéno
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Loperamide. Survey of studies on mechanism of its antidiarrheal activity.

Authors:  F Awouters; A Megens; M Verlinden; J Schuurkes; C Niemegeers; P A Janssen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.