Steven J Russell1. 1. Massachusetts General Hospital Diabetes Research Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article describes recent progress in the automated control of glycemia in type 1 diabetes with artificial pancreas devices that combine continuous glucose monitoring with automated decision-making and insulin delivery. RECENT FINDINGS: After a gestation period of closely supervised feasibility studies in research centers, the last 2 years have seen publication of studies testing these devices in outpatient environments, and many more such studies are ongoing. The most basic form of automation, suspension of insulin delivery for actual or predicted hypoglycemia, has been shown to be effective and well tolerated, and a first-generation device has actually reached the market. Artificial pancreas devices that actively dose insulin fall into two categories, those that dose insulin alone and those that also use glucagon to prevent and treat hypoglycemia (bihormonal artificial pancreas). Initial outpatient clinical trials have shown that both strategies can improve glycemic management in comparison with patient-controlled insulin pump therapy, but only the bihormonal strategy has been tested without restrictions on exercise. SUMMARY: Artificial pancreas technology has the potential to reduce acute and chronic complications of diabetes and mitigate the burden of diabetes self-management. Successful outpatient studies bring these technologies one step closer to availability for patients.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article describes recent progress in the automated control of glycemia in type 1 diabetes with artificial pancreas devices that combine continuous glucose monitoring with automated decision-making and insulin delivery. RECENT FINDINGS: After a gestation period of closely supervised feasibility studies in research centers, the last 2 years have seen publication of studies testing these devices in outpatient environments, and many more such studies are ongoing. The most basic form of automation, suspension of insulin delivery for actual or predicted hypoglycemia, has been shown to be effective and well tolerated, and a first-generation device has actually reached the market. Artificial pancreas devices that actively dose insulin fall into two categories, those that dose insulin alone and those that also use glucagon to prevent and treat hypoglycemia (bihormonal artificial pancreas). Initial outpatient clinical trials have shown that both strategies can improve glycemic management in comparison with patient-controlled insulin pump therapy, but only the bihormonal strategy has been tested without restrictions on exercise. SUMMARY:Artificial pancreas technology has the potential to reduce acute and chronic complications of diabetes and mitigate the burden of diabetes self-management. Successful outpatient studies bring these technologies one step closer to availability for patients.
Authors: Roman Hovorka; Daniela Elleri; Hood Thabit; Janet M Allen; Lalantha Leelarathna; Ranna El-Khairi; Kavita Kumareswaran; Karen Caldwell; Peter Calhoun; Craig Kollman; Helen R Murphy; Carlo L Acerini; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Marianna Nodale; David B Dunger Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Eda Cengiz; Dongyuan Xing; Jenise C Wong; Joseph I Wolfsdorf; Morey W Haymond; Arleta Rewers; Satya Shanmugham; William V Tamborlane; Steven M Willi; Diane L Seiple; Kellee M Miller; Stephanie N DuBose; Roy W Beck Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Boris P Kovatchev; Eric Renard; Claudio Cobelli; Howard C Zisser; Patrick Keith-Hynes; Stacey M Anderson; Sue A Brown; Daniel R Chernavvsky; Marc D Breton; Lloyd B Mize; Anne Farret; Jérôme Place; Daniela Bruttomesso; Simone Del Favero; Federico Boscari; Silvia Galasso; Angelo Avogaro; Lalo Magni; Federico Di Palma; Chiara Toffanin; Mirko Messori; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-06-14 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: David M Maahs; Peter Calhoun; Bruce A Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Irene Hramiak; John Lum; Fraser Cameron; B Wayne Bequette; Tandy Aye; Terri Paul; Robert Slover; R Paul Wadwa; Darrell M Wilson; Craig Kollman; Roy W Beck Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Firas H El-Khatib; Courtney Balliro; Mallory A Hillard; Kendra L Magyar; Laya Ekhlaspour; Manasi Sinha; Debbie Mondesir; Aryan Esmaeili; Celia Hartigan; Michael J Thompson; Samir Malkani; J Paul Lock; David M Harlan; Paula Clinton; Eliana Frank; Darrell M Wilson; Daniel DeSalvo; Lisa Norlander; Trang Ly; Bruce A Buckingham; Jamie Diner; Milana Dezube; Laura A Young; April Goley; M Sue Kirkman; John B Buse; Hui Zheng; Rajendranath R Selagamsetty; Edward R Damiano; Steven J Russell Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Katharine D Barnard; Timothy Wysocki; Vanessa Ully; Julia K Mader; Thomas R Pieber; Hood Thabit; Martin Tauschmann; Lalantha Leelarathna; Sara Hartnell; Carlo L Acerini; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Sibylle Dellweg; Carsten Benesch; Sabine Arnolds; Manuel Holzer; Harald Kojzar; Fiona Campbell; James Yong; Jennifer Pichierri; Peter Hindmarsh; Lutz Heinemann; Mark L Evans; Roman Hovorka Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2017-04-03
Authors: Annabelle Ballesta; Pasquale F Innominato; Robert Dallmann; David A Rand; Francis A Lévi Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 25.468
Authors: Mary Emma Gorham Bigelow; Brian G Jamieson; Chi On Chui; Yufei Mao; Kyeong-Sik Shin; Tony Jun Huang; Po-Hsun Huang; Liqiang Ren; Bishow Adhikari; Jue Chen; Erin Iturriaga Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 3.316
Authors: Molly L Tanenbaum; Rebecca N Adams; Monica S Lanning; Sarah J Hanes; Bianca I Agustin; Diana Naranjo; Korey K Hood Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2018-07-11