| Literature DB >> 25692739 |
Rachelle J Lancaster, Judith Westphal, Jayalakshmi Jambunathan.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe how students identify and interpret multiple embedded clinical cues in a case study, and then reflect these using SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation). Using Tanner's model of clinical judgment, a descriptive design was used to examine SBAR assignments completed by second-semester nursing students (n = 80). The majority of students (n = 62, 77.5%) in the study were unable to successfully follow all of the clinical judgment phases of the model: noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting. Although SBAR is an important tool for communicating clinical information, gaps exist between noticing and interpreting clinical cues, and forming an appropriate course of action. Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25692739 DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20150218-08
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nurs Educ ISSN: 0148-4834 Impact factor: 1.726