Literature DB >> 25692723

Observational studies and the natural history of screen-detected prostate cancer.

Peter C Albertsen1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the recent observational studies and clinical trials that guide our understanding of the natural history of screen-detected prostate cancer. RECENT
FINDINGS: Data from observational studies and clinical trials have been updated during the past year. The most important include the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group 4 study and the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening.
SUMMARY: Both retrospective population-based analyses and prospective randomized trials show that men who harbor low-volume low-grade prostate cancers have less than 6% risk of disease progression within a decade of diagnosis. For the men who pursue active surveillance prostate cancer mortality remains under 1% after a median follow-up of 6.8 years. Up to one-third of men abandon active surveillance protocols because of either prostate-specific antigen or biopsy progression. Around 10% abandon active surveillance because of anxiety. Researchers are actively exploring new imaging modalities and genetic markers to identify men whose prostate cancers are likely to progress. For now, patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer must carefully weigh the threat posed by their disease against the possible benefits and harms associated with intervention. For some, active surveillance will be an appropriate choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25692723     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  11 in total

1.  Development of a novel five-gene immune-related risk model for the prognosis evaluation of prostate adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Hongjun Fei; Xiongming Chen
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 5.942

2.  Whole-gland ablation therapy versus active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Dmitry Enikeev; Mark Taratkin; Alexander Amosov; Juan Gomez Rivas; Alexei Podoinitsin; Natalya Potoldykova; Marina Karageziyan; Petr Glybochko; Eric Barret
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-04-08

3.  Assessment of a prognostic model, PSA metrics and toxicities in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer using data from Project Data Sphere (PDS).

Authors:  Bethany Pitcher; Leila Khoja; Robert J Hamilton; Kald Abdallah; Melania Pintilie; Anthony M Joshua
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  New Insights in Prostate Cancer Development and Tumor Therapy: Modulation of Nuclear Receptors and the Specific Role of Liver X Receptors.

Authors:  Laura Bousset; Amandine Rambur; Allan Fouache; Julio Bunay; Laurent Morel; Jean-Marc A Lobaccaro; Silvère Baron; Amalia Trousson; Cyrille de Joussineau
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Aberrant DOCK2, GRASP, HIF3A and PKFP Hypermethylation has Potential as a Prognostic Biomarker for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Marianne T Bjerre; Siri H Strand; Maibritt Nørgaard; Helle Kristensen; Anne Ki Rasmussen; Martin Mørck Mortensen; Jacob Fredsøe; Peter Mouritzen; Benedicte Ulhøi; Torben Ørntoft; Michael Borre; Karina D Sørensen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  The Waiting Time of Prostate Cancer Patients in Poland.

Authors:  Karolina Osowiecka; Sergiusz Nawrocki; Marcin Kurowicki; Monika Rucinska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Role of Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging before Confirmatory Biopsy in Assessing the Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression during Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Joseba Salguero; Enrique Gómez-Gómez; José Valero-Rosa; Julia Carrasco-Valiente; Juan Mesa; Cristina Martin; Juan Pablo Campos-Hernández; Juan Manuel Rubio; Daniel López; María José Requena
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 8.  What interventions affect the psychosocial burden experienced by prostate cancer patients undergoing active surveillance? A scoping review.

Authors:  Kim Donachie; Erik Cornel; Thomas Pelgrim; Leslie Michielsen; Bart Langenveld; Marian Adriaansen; Esther Bakker; Lilian Lechner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.359

9.  Computer Extracted Features from Initial H&E Tissue Biopsies Predict Disease Progression for Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Sacheth Chandramouli; Patrick Leo; George Lee; Robin Elliott; Christine Davis; Guangjing Zhu; Pingfu Fu; Jonathan I Epstein; Robert Veltri; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Recommended Definitions of Aggressive Prostate Cancer for Etiologic Epidemiologic Research.

Authors:  Lauren M Hurwitz; Ilir Agalliu; Demetrius Albanes; Kathryn Hughes Barry; Sonja I Berndt; Qiuyin Cai; Chu Chen; Iona Cheng; Jeanine M Genkinger; Graham G Giles; Jiaqi Huang; Corinne E Joshu; Tim J Key; Synnove Knutsen; Stella Koutros; Hilde Langseth; Sherly X Li; Robert J MacInnis; Sarah C Markt; Kathryn L Penney; Aurora Perez-Cornago; Thomas E Rohan; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Meir J Stampfer; Konrad H Stopsack; Catherine M Tangen; Ruth C Travis; Stephanie J Weinstein; Wu Lang PhD; Eric J Jacobs; Lorelei A Mucci; Elizabeth A Platz; Michael B Cook
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.