Literature DB >> 25692718

Investigating general practitioner engagement with pharmacists in Home Medicines Review.

Daniel Costa1, Connie Van2, Penny Abbott3, Ines Krass2.   

Abstract

The Home Medicines Review (HMR) involves a home visit from an accredited HMR pharmacist to review a patient's medicines, and a report to the patient's general practitioner (GP) with recommendations for improving medicine management. Notwithstanding evidence supporting the benefits of medicines review, broad uptake by GPs in Australia remains low. We developed the 10-item Home Medicines Review Inventory (HMRI) to assess GP attitudes and behaviours regarding the HMR and modelled factors associated with the frequency of GP engagement with HMRs. Four items assessing frequency of behaviours and six items assessing attitudes related to HMR were answered by 180 GPs in a national GP survey. The HMRI's psychometric properties were examined with exploratory factor analysis (EFA), Rasch analysis, and correlations with related instruments. Structural equation modelling was used to evaluate factors associated with HMR-related behaviours. EFA and Rasch analysis generally supported the current format of the instrument. Attitudes to HMR, gender, previous positive experiences with pharmacists, a system for working together, and participation in joint education activities predicted frequency of HMR-related behaviours. Although GPs' attitudes to HMR were generally positive, HMR-related behaviours tended to occur with low frequency. This instrument may be used to investigate why HMR uptake has thus far been low and also help identify opportunities for building interprofessional communication and trust between GPs and pharmacists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  General practitioners; Home Medicines Review; interprofessional practice; pharmacists; quantitative method; questionnaire designs

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25692718     DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1012253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  8 in total

1.  Community pharmacists' and residents' decision making and unmet information needs when completing comprehensive medication reviews.

Authors:  Kacie L McPherson; Omolola A Adeoye-Olatunde; Jayna M Osborne; William R Doucette; Stephanie A Gernant; Heather Jaynes; Shobha Phansalkar; Alissa L Russ-Jara; Margie E Snyder
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2020-01-25

2.  Interprofessional communication between community pharmacists and general practitioners: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marina Weissenborn; Walter E Haefeli; Frank Peters-Klimm; Hanna M Seidling
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-03-17

3.  Impact of an enhanced pharmacy discharge service on prescribing appropriateness criteria: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Benjamin J Basger; Rebekah J Moles; Timothy F Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-08-22

4.  Qualitative study to conceptualise a model of interprofessional collaboration between pharmacists and general practitioners to support patients' adherence to medication.

Authors:  Adam P Rathbone; Sarab M Mansoor; Ines Krass; Kim Hamrosi; Parisa Aslani
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Effective communication and collaboration with health professionals: A qualitative study of primary care pharmacists in Western Australia.

Authors:  Tin Fei Sim; H Laetitia Hattingh; Bruce Sunderland; Petra Czarniak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Current perspectives on pharmacist home visits: do we keep reinventing the wheel?

Authors:  Priti S Flanagan; Andrea Barns
Journal:  Integr Pharm Res Pract       Date:  2018-10-01

7.  Patterns of high-risk prescribing and other factors in relation to receipt of a home medicines review: a prospective cohort investigation among adults aged 45 years and over in Australia.

Authors:  Wei Du; Danijela Gnjidic; Sallie-Anne Pearson; Sarah N Hilmer; Andrew J McLachlan; Fiona Blyth; Rosalie Viney; Grace Joshy; Cathy Day; Emily Banks
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Medication reviews in hospitalized patients: a qualitative study on perceptions of primary and secondary care providers on interprofessional collaboration.

Authors:  Bregje Walraven; Godelieve Ponjee; Wieke Heideman; Fatma Karapinar Çarkit
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.