| Literature DB >> 25692569 |
Esther Gómez1, Beatriz Álvarez2, Eric Duchaud3, José A Guijarro1.
Abstract
Flavobacterium psychrophilum is a Gram-negative fish pathogen that causes important economic losses in aquaculture worldwide. Although the genome of this bacterium has been determined, the function and relative importance of genes in relation to virulence remain to be established. To investigate their respective contribution to the bacterial pathogenesis, effective tools for gene inactivation are required. In the present study, a markerless gene deletion system has been successfully developed for the first time in this bacterium. Using this method, the F. psychrophilum fcpB gene, encoding a predicted cysteine protease homologous to Streptococcus pyogenes streptopain, was deleted. The developed system involved the construction of a conjugative plasmid that harbors the flanking sequences of the fcpB gene and an I-SceI meganuclease restriction site. Once this plasmid was integrated in the genome by homologous recombination, the merodiploid was resolved by the introduction of a plasmid expressing I-SceI under the control of the fpp2 F. psychrophilum inducible promoter. The resulting deleted fcpB mutant presented a decrease in extracellular proteolytic activity compared to the parental strain. However, there were not significant differences between their LD50 in an intramuscularly challenged rainbow trout infection model. The mutagenesis approach developed in this work represents an improvement over the gene inactivation tools existing hitherto for this "fastidious" bacterium. Unlike transposon mutagenesis and gene disruption, gene markerless deletion has less potential for polar effects and allows the mutation of virtually any non-essential gene or gene clusters.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25692569 PMCID: PMC4333118 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117969
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Strains, plasmids and oligonucleotides used in this work.
| Strain, plasmid or primer | Description or sequence | Reference |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
|
| ||
| S17–1 λ | λ | [ |
|
| ||
| THC02/90 | Parental strain | [ |
| THC02/90–23 | Parental strain carrying pCP23 plasmid | This study |
| THC02/90-TFS | Parental strain carrying pCP23-TFS plasmid | This study |
| fcpB3+ | Merodiploid strain resulting from overcrossing between del3’ fragments | This study |
| fcpB5+ | Merodiploid strain resulting from overcrossing between del5’ fragments | This study |
| fcpB- | FpcB- mutant | This study |
|
| ||
| pCP23 | ColE1 ori; (pCP1 ori), Apr (Tcr), bifunctional plasmid | [ |
| pCP23-Gfpp2 | pCP23-G plasmid carrying Pfpp2 inducible promoter; Apr (Tcr) | [ |
| pLYL03 | ColE1 ori; RK2oriT; Apr (Emr). | [ |
| Pacbsr | Plasmid carrying I | [ |
| pCP23-TFS | pCP23 plasmid carrying a trancription terminator (T), an inducible promoter (Pfpp2) and I | This study |
| pLYL03–3S5 | pLYL03 plasmid carrying 1.5 kb | This study |
|
| ||
| promfpp2_F | 5’ ATCA | This study |
| pfpp2_Sce_R | 5’TTGATGTTTTTCATATGCATATGTATATCTCCTTCTTAAA | This study |
| fus_Sce_F | 5’AGATCTTTTAAGAAGGAGATATACATATGCATATGAAAAACATCAAAAAAAACCAGGTAATG 3’ | This study |
| sce_R | 5’ CTCCTTA | This study |
| RP | 5’ GAGGAAACAGCTATGAC 3’ | This study |
| fcpBdel3’_F | 5’ ATCG | This study |
| fcpBdel3’_R | 5’ ATCG | This study |
| fcpBdel5’_F | 5’ATCG | This study |
| fcpBdel5’_R | 5’ ATCG | This study |
| fcpBint_F | 5’ AAATCAACATGAAGTAACACAA 3’ | This study |
| fcpBint_R | 5’ CCAGTTCATGTGTAAATATAGAT 3’ | This study |
| RTSceI_F | 5’ AAACTGCTGAAAGAATACAAATC 3’ | This study |
| RTSceI_R | 5’ AGGAGATAGTGTTCGGCAGT 3′ | This study |
* Antibiotic-resistance phenotypes: Apr, ampicillin; Tcr, tetracycline; Emr, erythromycin. Antibiotic-resistance phenotypes and other features listed in parentheses are those expressed by F. psychrophilum but not by E. coli.
Restriction sites are in bold type. ISce-I restriction site is underlined.
Fig 1fcpB locus and FcpB predicted structure.
(A) Gene organization of the fcpB locus in the F. psychrophilum genome. The position of each gene and the direction of the transcription are shown by arrows. The putative fcpB promoters (P), ribosomal binding site (RBS), and rho-independent transcriptional terminator (hairpin loop), together with the corresponding sequences, are showed. The flanking genes 0492 (encoding a putative transmembrane protein) and 0490 (encoding a putative lipoprotein precursor) are indicated. (B) Structural organization and predicted domains of the FcpB cystein peptidase. Domain regions are dark grey and the position of the initial and final residues of each domain are indicated below. The amino acids corresponding to the active site are indicated in bold.
Fig 2Markerless deletion strategy for F. psychrophilum.
(A1) A suicide plasmid (pLY03–3S5), containing an I-SceI recognition site and two fcpB flanking sequences of 1.5 kb (del5’ and del3’), was introduced in F. psychrophilum THC02/90 by conjugation. RK2oriT: conjugal transfer origin; ermF: erythromycin resistance gene in F. psychrophilum; bla: ampicillin resistance gene in E. coli; ori: replication origin in E. coli; lacI: lacI gene. Two possible integrations, depending on the flanking region where the recombination had occurred (FcpB5+ and FcpB3+ strains), are represented following continuous and dashed lines. HindIII restriction sites are indicated with HIII and the size of Southern Blot expected bands, using del5´ as a probe (grey line), are indicated above each scheme. (A2) Southern blot hybridization using a PCR generated labeled del5´ DNA fragment as a probe. Genomic DNA, from the parental strain F. psychrophilum THCO2/90 (lane 2) and the transconjugants which harbor the two possible generated cointegrates: lanes 3, FcpB3+ and lane 4, FcpB5+, was digested with HindIII and hybridized with del5´ fragment labeled probe. Molecular mass ladder, phage λ DNA digested with PstI (lane 1). The two top hybridization bands corresponding to lane 3 (5.27 and 3.85 kb) and lane 4 (4.91 and 4.22 kb) are tenuous because the length of their homologous sequences with the probe is very short. (B1) The FcpB5+ and FcpB3+ merodiploid strains were conjugated (only FcpB5+ is represented) with an E. coli S17–1 λ pir strain harboring a plasmid (pCP23-TFS) expressing I-SceI (I-SceI) under the control of the F. psychrophilum fpp2 calcium-temperature inducible promoter (Pfpp2). T: transcription terminator; pCP1ori: replication origin in F. psychrophilum; tetQ: tetracycline resistance gene in F. psychrophilum; bla: ampicillin resistance gene in E. coli; oriT: conjugal transfer origin; pUCori: replication origin in E. coli. Transconjugants were selected at 12°C in a medium containing tetracycline and CaCl2 leading to the resolution of the merodiploid by generation of a wild-type genotype (left side of the figure) or in a markerless fcpB gene deleted strain (right side of the figure). I-SceI mediated double strain break is indicated by an arrow head symbol. (B2) Southern Blot hybridization using genomic DNA from the wild-type and the fcpB deleted mutant strain, digested with HindIII and hybridized with an internal fcpB fragment. Lane 2, wild-type; lane 3 fcpB deleted mutant strain; Lane 1, molecular mass ladder (phage λ DNA digested with PstI).
Fig 3RT-PCR analysis of the I-SceI expression under the CaCl2-temperature inducible promoter Pfpp2.
Each PCR was performed with 20 ng of F. psychrophilum RNA. Oligonucleotides homologous to I-SceI gene, giving an internal RT-PCR fragment of 640 nt, were used. RT-PCRs were performed with RNA from F. psychrophilum THC02/90 strain carrying pCP23 plasmid (lane2) and pCP23-TFS plasmid (lane 3), which were incubated at 12°C and CaCl2 until early stationary phase. As controls for DNA contamination, PCRs were also carried out with the primers used for RT-PCR analysis by omitting the reverse transcription step, using RNA samples from F. psychrophilum THC02/90 strain carrying pCP23 plasmid (lane 4), pCP23-TFS plasmid (lane 5) and DEPC water as templates. Lane 1: 100 bp molecular marker (Biotools).