Literature DB >> 25692546

In silico analysis of the interaction of avian aryl hydrocarbon receptors and dioxins to decipher isoform-, ligand-, and species-specific activations.

Masashi Hirano1, Ji-Hee Hwang2, Hae-Jeong Park2, Su-Min Bak2, Hisato Iwata1, Eun-Young Kim2.   

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) mediates toxic responses to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and other dioxin-like compounds (DLCs). Avian species possess multiple AHR isoforms (AHR1, AHR1β, and AHR2) that exhibit species- and isoform-specific responses to ligands. To account for the ligand preference in terms of the structural features of avian AHRs, we generated in silico homology models of the ligand-binding domain of avian AHRs based on holo human HIF-2α (PDB entry 3H7W ). Molecular docking simulations of TCDD and other DLCs with avian AHR1s and AHR2s using ASEDock indicated that the interaction energy increased with the number of substituted chlorine atoms in congeners, supporting AHR transactivation potencies and World Health Organization TCDD toxic equivalency factors of congeners. The potential interaction energies of an endogenous AHR ligand, 6-formylindolo [3,2-b] carbazole (FICZ) to avian AHRs were lower than those of TCDD, which was supported by a greater potency of FICZ for in vitro AHR-mediated transactivation than TCDD. The molecular dynamics simulation revealed that mean square displacements in Ile324 and Ser380 of TCDD-bound AHR1 of the chicken, the most sensitive species to TCDD, were smaller than those in other avian AHR1s, suggesting that the dynamic stability of these amino acid residues contribute to TCDD preference. For avian AHR2, the corresponding residues (Val/Ser or Val/Ala type) were not responsible for differential TCDD sensitivity. Application of the three-dimensional reference interaction site model showed that the stabilization of TCDD binding to avian AHRs may be due to the solvation effect depending on the characteristics of two amino acids corresponding to Ile324 and Ser380 in chicken AHR1. This study demonstrates that in silico simulations of AHRs and ligands could be used to predict isoform-, ligand-, and species-specific interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25692546     DOI: 10.1021/es505733f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Molecular modeling of the AhR structure and interactions can shed light on ligand-dependent activation and transformation mechanisms.

Authors:  Laura Bonati; Dario Corrada; Sara Giani Tagliabue; Stefano Motta
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  Assessing Binary Mixture Effects from Genotoxic and Endocrine Disrupting Environmental Contaminants Using Infrared Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Camilo L M Morais; Richard F Shore; M Glória Pereira; Francis L Martin
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2018-10-17

3.  Marine Polyhydroxynaphthoquinone, Echinochrome A: Prevention of Atherosclerotic Inflammation and Probable Molecular Targets.

Authors:  Aleksandr A Artyukov; Elena A Zelepuga; Larisa N Bogdanovich; Natalia M Lupach; Vyacheslav L Novikov; Tatyana A Rutckova; Emma P Kozlovskaya
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Quantum Chemical Investigation of Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins, Dibenzofurans and Biphenyls: Relative Stability and Planarity Analysis.

Authors:  Sopanant Datta; Taweetham Limpanuparb
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Ecological factors drive natural selection pressure of avian aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 genotypes.

Authors:  Ji-Hee Hwang; Jin-Young Park; Hae-Jeong Park; Su-Min Bak; Masashi Hirano; Hisato Iwata; Young-Suk Park; Eun-Young Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Species-Specific Differences in Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Responses: How and Why?

Authors:  Xiaoting Xu; Xi Zhang; Yuzhu Yuan; Yongrui Zhao; Hamza M Fares; Mengjiao Yang; Qing Wen; Reham Taha; Lixin Sun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.