Xerostomia induced by radiotherapy: an overview of the physiopathology, clinical evidence, and management of the oral damage.

BACKGROUND: The irradiation of head and neck cancer (HNC) often causes damage to the salivary glands. The resulting salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia seriously reduce the patient's quality of life.
PURPOSE: To analyze the literature of actual management strategies for radiation-induced hypofunction and xerostomia in HNC patients.
METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases were electronically evaluated for articles published from January 1, 1970, to June 30, 2013. Two reviewers independently screened and included papers according to the predefined selection criteria.
RESULTS: Sixty-one articles met the inclusion criteria. The systematic review of the literature suggests that the most suitable methods for managing the clinical and pathophysiological consequences of HNC radiotherapy might be the pharmacological approach, for example, through the use of cholinergic agonists when residual secretory capacity is still present, and the use of salivary substitutes. In addition, a modified diet and the patient's motivation to enhance oral hygiene can lead to a significant improvement.
CONCLUSION: Radiation-induced xerostomia could be considered a multifactorial disease. It could depend on the type of cancer treatment and the cumulative radiation dose to the gland tissue. A preventive approach and the correct treatment of the particular radiotherapeutic patient can help to improve the condition of xerostomia.

Introduction

Xerostomia is a term used to describe the subjective symptoms of a dry mouth deriving from a lack of saliva. A large variety of causes can lead to xerostomia, eg, radiotherapy and chemotherapy,1–4 the chronic use of drugs,5–7 and rheumatic and dysmetabolic diseases.8,9

Saliva is an important host defense component of the oral cavity. Major salivary glands contribute to most of the secretion volume and electrolyte content of saliva (the parotid, submandibular, and sublingual glands, which account for 90% of saliva production), whereas minor salivary glands contribute little secretion volume and most of the blood-group substance.10 Saliva components interact in related functions in the following general areas:

bicarbonates, phosphates, and urea act to modulate pH and the buffering capacity of saliva;

macromolecule proteins and mucins serve to cleanse, aggregate, and/or attach oral microorganisms and contribute to the dental plaque metabolism;

calcium, phosphates, and proteins work together as an antisolubility factor and modulate demineralization and remineralization of tooth surfaces;

immunoglobulins, proteins, and enzymes provide antibacterial action.

Objectively, patients affected by xerostomia have a hypofunction of the salivary output11,12 leading to functional oral disorders such as sore throat, altered taste, dental decay, changes in voice quality, and impaired chewing and swallowing function.13 These factors may ultimately cause reduced nutritional intake and weight loss and significantly affect general health and quality of life of the subjects involved.

Head and neck cancer (HNC) actually includes many different malignancies. The most common type of cancer in the head and neck is squamous cell carcinoma, which originates in the cells that line the inside of the paranasal sinuses, nasal cavity, salivary glands, oral cavity, esophagus, pharynx, and larynx.14 Worldwide, lip and oral cavity cancer along with thyroid cancer has the highest incidence; esophagus cancer is the most aggressive presenting a 4.9% mortality rate (Table 1).

Table 1

World incidence, mortality, and 5-year prevalence of head and neck cancer

Cancer	Incidence			Mortality			5-year prevalence
	Number	%	ASR (W)	Number	%	ASR (W)	Number	%	Proportion
Lip, oral cavity	300,373	2.1	4.0	145,328	1.8	1.9	702,149	2.2	13.5
Nasopharynx	86,691	0.6	1.2	50,828	0.6	0.7	228,698	0.7	4.4
Other pharynx	142,387	1.0	1.9	96,090	1.2	1.3	309,991	1.0	6.0
Esophagus	455,784	3.2	5.9	400,156	4.9	5.0	464,063	1.4	8.9
Larynx	156,877	1.1	2.1	83,376	1.0	1.1	441,675	1.4	8.5
Thyroid	298,102	2.1	4.0	39,769	0.5	0.5	1,206,075	3.7	23.2

Notes: % = risk of getting or dying from the disease before age 75.

Abbreviation: ASR, age-standardized rate.

Similar findings regarding the incidence, mortality, and prevalence of cancer in the European Union have been reported. The highest mortality rate belongs again to esophagus cancer with a predominance of 2.3% (Table 2).

Table 2

European Union incidence, mortality, and 5-year prevalence of head and neck cancer

Cancer	Incidence			Mortality			5-year prevalence
	Number	%	ASR (W)	Number	%	ASR (W)	Number	%	Proportion
Lip, oral cavity	43,847	1.6	4.9	14,467	1.1	1.5	121,633	1.7	28.4
Nasopharynx	3,267	0.1	0.4	1,494	0.1	0.2	9,283	0.1	2.2
Other pharynx	26,585	1.0	3.2	12,583	1.0	1.4	67,590	0.9	15.8
Esophagus	34,777	1.3	3.4	29,845	2.3	2.8	38,086	0.5	8.9
Larynx	28,336	1.1	3.1	12,248	1.0	1.2	94,193	1.3	22.0
Thyroid	37,440	1.4	5.4	3,637	0.3	0.3	149,044	2.1	34.8

Note: % = risk of getting or dying from the disease before age 75.

Abbreviation: ASR, age-standardized rate.

Other less common types of HNCs include salivary gland tumors, lymphomas, and sarcomas.15

The way a particular HNC behaves depends on the primary site in which it arises, and the spread to the lymph nodes in the neck is relatively common.

A patient may receive radiotherapy before, during, or after surgery. Some patients may receive radiotherapy alone without surgery or any other treatment; others may receive radiotherapy and chemotherapy at the same time. The timing of radiotherapy depends on the type of cancer and on the goal of the treatment (cure or palliation). Radiotherapy treats cancer by using doses of high-energy X-rays to destroy the cancer cells while avoiding as much harm as possible to normal cells. The treatment is usually given every weekday with a pause at the weekend; some protocols are based on more than one irradiation a day, and occasionally include therapy during the weekend. The treatment will usually last 3–7 weeks, depending on the type and size of the cancer. Most of the time, patients with HNC treated with radiotherapy receive a dose between 50 Gy and 70 Gy once a day for 5 days a week (2 Gy per fraction);4 on the other hand, if the radiotherapy protocol is just preoperative, the total amount of radiation is usually lower. Conformal radiotherapy is the most common type of radiotherapy used for the treatment of HNC; a special attachment to the radiotherapy machine carefully arranges the radiation beams to match the shape of the cancer, reducing the radiation to the surrounding healthy cells. Another similar type of radiotherapy used against HNC, known as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, allows a more accurate delivery of specific radiation to be distributed to the tumor mass according to its location and severity, sparing the tissue and organs at risk, eg, salivary glands.10

Aims

The aim of the study is to systematically determine the current treatment option for cancer-/radiation-induced xerostomia among patients treated for HNC, and to describe the strategic prevention and management enhancements.

Materials and methods

Systematic review methodology

Search strategy

A first systematic literature search for articles published between January 1, 1970 and June 30, 2013 was conducted in the databases MEDLINE/PubMed and the Cochrane Library, using combinations of the MeSH terms: [Saliva] OR [Salivary Glands] OR [Saliva Flow] OR [Salivation] OR [Salivary Gland Diseases] OR [Xerostomia] OR [Saliva in Xerostomia] OR [Dry Mouth] OR [Oral Dryness] OR [Composition Saliva Xerostomia] AND [Head and Neck Cancer] OR [Radiotherapy] OR [Radiation-induced Xerostomia] OR [Parotid-Sparing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy] AND [Quality of Life Analysis-Xerostomia] OR [Management Strategies Salivary Gland Hypofunction] OR [Prevention Xerostomia] OR [Treatment Xerostomia]. The search results were imported into a computerized database Review Manager 5.2. The search results from each of the electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed and the Cochrane Library were combined, and duplicated publications were eliminated. Subsequently, an update to include studies published up to June 30, 2013, was performed.

Criteria for selecting studies

After completing the search, articles for review were selected based on:

English language

Original data of cancer therapy protocols

Oral complications associated with cancer therapies

Human.

Exclusion criteria

The reasons for exclusion were defined as follows:

Studies without original and/or actual data

Studies with data from previous publications

Opinion papers

Editorials.

In this way, a preliminary set of potentially relevant publications, removing irrelevant citations according to the criteria, was created. Two reviewers (RP and GC) independently screened the registered title and abstracts, and author and references in two separate files (one for included abstracts and one for excluded abstracts) using a screening guide based on eligibility criteria. Studies rejected at this stage or subsequent stages were reported in the table of excluded studies (Table 3). The full text of all potentially eligible studies in at least one screening was retrieved. Reviewers then evaluated the full text for inclusion using a screening guide and a second reviewer (RP) screened all the findings. When disagreement occurred, a third reviewer (IM) was consulted. For each review, the following information was recorded: year, authors, journal, aim, and number of papers reviewed (Table 4); and for clinical trial papers included: year, authors, journal, aim, number of patients, and results (Table 5). All studies meeting the inclusion criteria then underwent validity assessment. Two examiners (RP and GC) read the papers independently. The qualities and relevance of each study were graded as follows: high (+++), medium (++), or low (+) using a study-quality checklist. External validity, internal validity, and study precision were analyzed to obtain an overall assessment of quality. The assessment was used as a basis for the discussion between the two examiners to grade the studies. In the case of disagreement, all authors discussed the paper until a consensus was reached.

Table 3

Papers excluded

Reference	Year	Authors	Journal	Reason
19	1991	Vissink et al	J Oral Pathol Med	Animal study
70	1998	Davies	Br Med J	Editorial
46	1998	Spielman	J Dent Res	Animal study
51	2000	Kuntz et al	Int J Pharm Compound	Opinion paper
3	2005	Waltimo et al	Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed	Article in German

Table 4

Reviews included

Reference	Year	Authors	Journal	Aim	Number of papers reviewed	Qualities and relevance of studies included score
23	1977	Dreizen et al	Postgrad Med	Narrative – To evaluate the main injury of the surrounding tissues during radiotherapy for oral cancer that can have devastating physical and psychological consequences for the patients	13	++
45	1994	Atkinson and Wu	J Am Dent Assoc	Narrative – To evaluate the three most common known causes (medication, radiotherapy, and Sjögren’s syndrome) of salivary gland dysfunction and their clinical management	62	+++
17	1996	Scully and Epstein	Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol	Narrative – To discuss the etiopathogenesis and current means available for preventing, ameliorating, and treating radiotherapy complications, as well as indicating research directions	282	+++
1	1998	Bivona	N Y State Dent J	Narrative – To evaluate generally physiopathological features and clinical management of Sjögren’s syndrome	16	++
61	2000	Dyke	Int J Pharm Compound	Narrative – To evaluate physiopathological features and clinical management of Sjögren’s syndrome	19	+
18	2000	Sreebny	Int Dent J	Systematic – This paper reviews the role of saliva, the prevalence of oral dryness, and consequent importance of salivary flow as well as the relationship between xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction among the causes of oral dryness. Other aspects: association between saliva and Sjögren’s syndrome and esophageal function; use of saliva as diagnostic tool	134	+++
47	2002	Pedersen et al	Oral Dis	Narrative – This paper reviews the role of human saliva and its compositional elements in relation to the gastrointestinal functions of taste, mastication, bolus formation, enzymatic digestion, and swallowing	161	+
2	2003	Cassolato and Turnbull	Gerodontology	Narrative – To outline for clinicians the common etiologies, clinical identification, and routine therapeutic modalities available for individuals with xerostomia	86	+++
12	2004	Porter et al	Oral Surg Oral Med Ora Pathol Oral Radiol Endod	Narrative – To create an update of the etiology and management of xerostomia	229	+++
14	2008	Argiris et al	Lancet	Narrative – To review the epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis and staging, and the latest multimodal management of squamous cell carcinoma of the HNC	153	+++
63	2008	Sagar	Curr Treat Options Oncol	Narrative – To describe the effectiveness of acupuncture to control the symptoms of cancer patients, with an evidence-based approach	59	++
55	2010	Ramos-Casals et al	JAMA	Systematic – To summarize evidence on primary Sjögren’s syndrome drug therapy from randomized controlled trials	74	+
10	2010	Jensen et al	Support Care Cancer	Systematic – To assess the literature for management strategies and economic impact of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies and to determine the quality of evidence-based management recommendations	154	+++
10	2010	Jensen et al	Support Care Cancer	Systematic – To assess the literature for prevalence, severity, and impact on quality of life of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies	203	+++
66	2010	O’Sullivan and Higginson	Acupunct Med	Systematic – To systematically review evidence on clinical effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in irradiation-induced xerostomia in patients with HNC	51	+++
41	2013	Radvansky et al	Am J Health Syst Pharm	Narrative – To evaluate current strategies for preventing and managing radiation-induced dermatitis, mucositis, and xerostomia, with an emphasis on pharmacologic interventions	52	++
67	2013	Zhuang et al	Integr Cancer Ther	Systematic – To evaluate the preventive and therapeutic effect of acupuncture for radiation-induced xerostomia among patients with HNC	46	+++

Notes: +++, high level; ++, medium level; +, low level.

Abbreviation: HNC, head and neck cancer.

Table 5

Clinical trial papers included

Reference	Year	Authors	Journal	Aim	Number of patients	Results	Qualities and relevance of studies included score
35	1974	Brown et al	J Dent Res	To assess the effects of radiation-induced xerostomia on the human oral microflora	30	Cariogenic microorganisms gain prominence at the expense of non-cariogenic microorganisms in concert with saliva shutdown	+++
49	1974	Chen and Webster	Cancer	One hundred and one cases of head and neck cancer were subjected to oral culture for Candida albicans before, during, and l month after radiotherapy	101	Thirty percent of the patients had a positive culture before radiotherapy. During the course of radiotherapy, almost half of the negative patients turned positive. The severity of the acute radiation reaction of the oropharyngeal mucosa was not related to the apparent presence or absence of C. albicans. Amphotericin B (1 cm3 [100 mg] four times daily) converted about one-third of the positive patients to negative	++
24	1975	Ben-Aryeh et al	Int J Oral Surg	Flow rate, pH, electrolytes, protein, and phosphate evaluation of whole saliva in 15 healthy individuals and 15 patients with malignant tumors in the head and neck region before and during irradiation therapy	30	The most significant finding was the increased sodium content. Irradiation reduces the reabsorption ability of the tubuli, causing the sodium content of the saliva to increase	++
25	1976	Dreizen et al	Cancer	Saliva and serum electrolyte concentrations were monitored in 30 patients given a course of xerostomia-producing cancer radiotherapy	30	The xerostomic saliva was more concentrated and had a greater salinity than the pretreatment saliva in each instance. In contrast, none of the serum electrolytes measured was significantly altered by the subtotal salivary shutdown	++
28	1981	Abelson and Mandel	J Dent Res	To evaluate the impact of the saliva on plaque in vivo, following exposure to a sucrose substrate, in ten caries-resistant and ten caries-susceptible subjects under varying conditions of salivary access	20	The study results indicate that saliva plays a major role in mediating plaque pH and qualitatively reflects caries status	+
36	1981	Keene et al	Caries Res	To evaluate the prevalence of Streptococcus mutans in both preradiation and irradiation patients	39	S. mutans were detected in 82% of the irradiated patients and 100% of the preradiotherapy patients. In the irradiated group without current caries, S. mutans prevalence was inversely related to the number of elapsed years postradiotherapy	+++
34	1981	Izutsu et al	Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol	Albumin concentrations were measured in whole and parotid saliva samples collected from patients who were undergoing various cancer treatment protocols and had a high incidence of stomatitis	7	The salivary albumin increases always preceded and often occurred in the absence of stomatitis, suggesting that the whole saliva albumin level may be a useful measure and predictor of this condition	++
26	1981	Marks et al	Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys	To establish a dose–response curve for the human parotid, selective measurements of right and left parotid salivary flow were done for 15 age-matched control patients whose parotids were not irradiated, 17 patients who had both parotids irradiated, and 12 whose parotids were irradiated by unilateral electron beam technique	46	In this study there clearly exists a dose–response correlation for the late effects of radiation on parotid salivary flow. Indeed, parotid salivary flow progressively decreased with increasing doses of radiation. A change in the pH of saliva that, especially at high doses, becomes acidic was found	+++
33	1986	Makkonen et al	Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol	To analyze the radiation-induced changes in the flow rate and protein composition of stimulated whole saliva in eleven patients treated for malignant conditions of the head and neck	11	It is concluded that the observed qualitative changes in whole saliva components are net effects caused by the cancer itself, radiotherapy given, systemic diseases, or medications, as well as mucosal inflammations	+++
11	1987	Fox et al	J Am Dent Assoc	Describes the responses to a questionnaire of oral findings and QOL in patients with reduced saliva flow. Moreover, an objective measurement of the major saliva output unstimulated and stimulated	100	In this study there exists a correlation between clinical symptoms and low-rate salivary flow. The questionnaire clearly helps to identify xerostomic patients and allows appropriate management to begin	++
37	1988	Hase and Birkhed	Arch Oral Biol	The aim was to study the effect of different salivary secretion rates on glucose clearance in saliva and on pH change in dental plaque in man, in normal and hyposalivation conditions		The pH changes in dental plaque after the mouth rinse with glucose at extremely low secretion rate were significantly more pronounced than the normal flow rate. Thus, the salivary secretion rate affects both the glucose clearance in saliva and the pH changes in dental plaque in man	+
16	1991	Maciejewski et al	Radiother Oncol	To evaluate the effects and efficacy of the application of 2% silver-nitrate solution for several days before radiotherapy in 16 patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx	16	The application of solutions and astringents is effective in modifying the development of acute side effects of radiotherapy and to decrease signs, symptoms, and suffering by modulating the biological status of critical normal tissue before the onset of radiotherapy. Unfortunately, their application before radiotherapy has not given significant results in order to promote reparative processes	+++
29	1993	Lingström and Birkhed	Acta Odontol Scand	To evaluate plaque pH and oral retention after consumption of starchy snack products at normal and low salivary secretion rate	10	All products resulted in greater pH falls and remained at a low level for a longer period during low secretion rate. There were no differences in concentration of carbohydrates in saliva after consumption of starchy snack products. Low secretion rate increased the oral retention for all products	++
32	1993	Valdez et al	Cancer	To evaluate whether the sialogogue pilocarpine given during radiotherapy may reduce the severity of xerostomia and salivary dysfunction. The patients, requiring head, neck, or mantle radiotherapy, took either 5 mg of pilocarpine or placebo four times daily for 3 months, beginning the day before radiotherapy. Subjective complaints and salivary functions were assessed	10	The stimulation with pilocarpine may reduce the severity of salivary dysfunction and associated oral symptoms during radiotherapy	++
60	1997	Bagheri et al	Eur J Clin Pharmacol	To compare the effects of yohimbine, an alpha-2 adrenoceptor antagonist, and anethole trithione, a reference drug in the treatment of dry mouth, in patients treated with psychotropic drugs (tricyclic antidepressants or neuroleptics) and suffering from xerostomia	10	The study results show that under experimental conditions, yohimbine, but not anethole trithione, stimulates salivary secretion after a 5-day treatment in patients receiving antidepressants or neuroleptics and suffering from dry mouth	+
48	1997	Ramirez-Amador et al	Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod	To quantitate oral Candida colonization, assessing symptoms, and response to antifungal management, especially Candida, and evaluate the influence of smoking and dentures	46	When salivary glands are included in the field of radiation, xerostomia occurs causing progressive increases in oral Candida colonization. Because 17.4% developed clinical candidiasis during radiotherapy and the question of fungal resistance remains speculative, a recommendation for the prophylactic use of antifungal medication is unresolved	+++
31	1998	Almståhl and Wikström	J Dent Res	To evaluate the effect of hyposalivation on the oral microflora	38	The results indicated that a low salivary secretion rate mainly promotes a flora associated with the development of caries	+++
38	1998	Ravald and List	Swed Dent J	The investigation is designed to study caries and periodontal conditions in a selected group of patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Clinical examination includes registrations of dental caries, restorations, and periodontal condition	21	The patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome face a high risk of developing both coronal and root caries due to xerostomia. The periodontal conditions are similar to those found in patient groups in general dentistry	++
13	1999	De-Graeff et al	Oral Oncol	To describe prospectively the QOL and mood in patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer treated with surgery radiotherapy	75	After treatment, a gradual improvement in emotional functioning occurred. Surgical treatment for oral or oropharyngeal cancer results in significant deterioration of physical functioning and symptoms during the first year, especially when combined with radiotherapy	+++
59	1999	Hamada et al	Am J Med Sci	To evaluate the efficacy of AT, a cholagogue, for xerostomia signs management	49	The results indicate that AT sufficiently stimulates salivation and improves xerostomia	+++
39	2001	Almståhl et al	Oral Microbiol Immunol	To compare lactoferrin, amylase, and MUC5B concentrations in stimulated whole saliva collected from subjects with radiation-induced hyposalivation, subjects with primary Sjögren’s syndrome, and subjects with hyposalivation of unknown origin or due to medicines. In addition, the data in relation to the presence of selected microbial species that have been associated with oral disorders were analyzed	75	The saliva composition in subjects with hyposalivation of unknown origin or due to medicines was close to that in the healthy controls. All three hyposalivation groups tended to display a decrease in the concentrations of MUC5B and amylase. None of the microbial species analyzed correlated with concentration of MUC5B in saliva	+++
20	2001	Burlage et al	Radiother Oncol	It was studied whether differences in acute radiosensitivity exist between parotid and submandibular/sublingual glands	18	The results revealed that salivary flow rates decreased dramatically during the first 2 weeks of radiotherapy. Neither recovery nor significant differences were observed between the production of saliva from the parotid and submandibular/sublingual glands during the 13-week observation period	+++
21	2001	Epstein et al	Head Neck	To assess the QOL, oral function, and oral symptoms in a cohort of patients during and after radiotherapy, by QLQ-C30, with an added oral symptom and function	20	The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire with the oral assessment addendum provides a measure of the QOL and oral function in head and neck cancer patients and may provide useful outcome measures for assessment of oral care prevention and management strategies in these patient populations	++
9	2001	Moore et al	Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod	The study evaluates the prevalence of dry-mouth symptoms (xerostomia), the prevalence of hyposalivation in this population, and the possible interrelationships between salivary dysfunction and diabetic complications	676	Subjects with type 1 diabetes who had developed neuropathy more often reported symptoms of dry mouth as well as symptoms of decreased salivary flow rates	+
42	2002	Wijers et al	Head Neck	The first aim of the study was to evaluate the degree of xerostomia in 39 long-term survivors* treated between 1965 and 1995 by conventional 2D radiotherapy and currently without evidence of disease. The second aim was to develop a concise instrument to evaluate the subjective aspects of xerostomia	39	In this survey, 64% of the long-term survivors*, after treatment by conventional 2D radiotherapy for a malignancy in the head and neck region, still experienced a moderate-to-severe degree of permanent xerostomia	++
56	2004	Hendrickson et al	J Emerg Med	A report of a case of unintentional overdose of oral pilocarpine tablets that resulted in bradycardia, mild hypotension, and muscarinic symptoms in a patient with Sjögren’s syndrome	1		++
53	2004	Koseki et al	Oral Dis	To investigate oral symptoms and clinical parameters in dry eye patients	224	The sensation of a dry mouth and changes in oral soft tissues, dental caries, and oral Candida frequently occurred in dry eye patients	++
30	2006	Eliasson et al	Eur J Oral Sci	To investigate the secretion rate from palatal, buccal, and labial glands, and to analyze the IgA concentrations in relation to age, sex, circulatory disease, diabetes, medication, smoking, and pregnancy	142	The results did not suggest any effect of aging on the secretion capacity of minor salivary glands, but the IgA concentration seemed to increase with age. Women had lower buccal and labial saliva secretion rates, and lower levels of IgA in buccal saliva, than men. For whole saliva, resting, but not stimulated, saliva secretion rates were reduced with age, and the secretion rate of stimulated whole saliva was lower in women than in men	+
57	2007	Chambers et al	Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys	To assess the safety of long-term cevimeline treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer; and to assess the efficacy of cevimeline in these patients	255	Cevimeline 45 mg three times daily was generally well tolerated over a period of 52 weeks in subjects with xerostomia secondary to radiotherapy for cancer in the head and neck region	+++
57	2007	Chambers et al	Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys	To study the efficacy and safety of cevimeline in two double-blind trials enrolling patients with head and neck cancer in whom xerostomia developed after radiotherapy	500	Cevimeline was well tolerated by patients with xerostomia after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer, and oral administration of 30–45 mg of cevimeline three times daily increased unstimulated salivary flow	+++
4	2009	Brand et al	Br Dent J	To assess the severity of xerostomia in HSCT patients and to investigate the association of xerostomia with other chronic oral complications	89	HSCT patients have more severe xerostomia, which is associated with other oral complaints	+
8	2009	Busato et al	Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod	To evaluate the impact of xerostomia on the QOL of adolescents with DM1	56	Xerostomia is frequent and has a negative impact on QOL of adolescents with DM1	+++
54	2010	Tomiita et al	Mod Rheumatol	To evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered pilocarpine hydrochloride for juvenile-onset Sjögren’s syndrome patients	5	The results of this study suggest that orally administered pilocarpine is safe and effective for treating xerostomia in juvenile-onset Sjögren’s syndrome patients	+
40	2010	Almståhl et al	Arch Oral Biol	To analyze the frequency of different Lactobacillus spp. in relation to the pH-lowering potential of the plaque	30	There were large intra- and interindividual variations in frequencies of Lactobacillus spp. and Lactobacillus counts, but no specific species could be related to plaque acidogenicity	+++
52	2010	Almeida and Kowalski	Braz J Otorhinolaryngol	To report on the experience with pilocarpine on the treatment of xerostomia in thyroid cancer patients submitted to adjuvant RIT	84	Pilocarpine seems to relieve xerostomia complaints in thyroid cancer patients because it is able to stimulate salivary flow, but the observed side effects made the patients refuse long-term therapy continuation	+++
43	2011	Sher et al	Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys	A retrospective study of all patients treated at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute for HNCUP with IMRT between August 2004 and January 2009. The primary endpoint was overall survival; the secondary endpoints were locoregional and distant control, and acute and chronic toxicity	24	In a single-institution series, IMRT-based chemoradiotherapy for HNCUP was associated with superb overall survival and locoregional control. The xerostomia rates were promising, but the aggressive therapy was associated with significant rates of esophageal stenosis	++
7	2011	Villa et al	J Am Dent Assoc	To estimate the prevalence of the subjective perception of dry mouth in dental patients in Italy, to relate these estimates to the patients’ ages and sexes, and to determine whether xerogenic medications taken by these patients were associated with complaints of xerostomia	1,201	The authors found that medication use and age were highly significant risk factors for dental patients reporting xerostomia	++
6	2011	Villa and Abati	Aust Dent J	To examine the symptoms and risk factors associated with self-reported xerostomia	601	Participants reported having dry mouth in 19.6% of cases. Older individuals were significantly more likely to report dry mouth, and the prevalence of xerostomia increased with advancing age. The prevalence of xerostomia in patients taking one or more drugs was significantly higher compared to medication-free patients, and increased with increasing numbers of medications used. Finally, individuals with a nervous or mental disorder, or who wore removable dentures, were five times more likely to develop xerostomia than patients without mental disorder or dentures	++
44	2012	Schoenfeld et al	Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys	To analyze the recent single-institution experience of patients with salivary gland tumors who had undergone adjuvant IMRT, with or without concurrent chemotherapy	35	Treatment of salivary gland malignancies with postoperative IMRT was well tolerated with a high rate of local control. Chemoradiotherapy resulted in excellent local control in a subgroup of patients with adverse prognostic factors and might be warranted in select patients	++

Notes: +++, high level; ++, medium level; +, low level.

The cohort of patients who had been free of disease for 5 years or longer.

Abbreviations: EC, ethylenedicysteine; ECD, N,N′-1,2-ethylenediylbis-l-cysteinediethylester; AT, anethole trithione; QLQ, Quality of Life Questionnaire; IgA, immunoglobulin A; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; QOL, quality of life; DM1, type 1 diabetes mellitus; RIT, radioactive iodine therapy; HNCUP, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; IMRT, intensity-modulated radiotherapy; 2D, two-dimensional; EORTC, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; QLQ-C30, Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Results

The electronic searches identified about 1,000 titles and abstracts, and after reviewing the titles, 411 studies were evaluated. Subsequently, during the review of the abstract, 336 studies were excluded. The final analysis included 70 articles that conformed to the criteria for the present review (Figure 1). Although animal studies have been excluded, important information regarding the experimental results on two of the papers was considered useful and therefore they were discussed.

Figure 1

Search flowchart.

Physiopathological and clinical consequences in cancer therapy

Each of the reviews concerning the physiopathological and clinical consequences are listed in Table 6.

Table 6

Reviews included related to physiopathological and clinical consequences in cancer therapy

Reference	Year	Authors	Journal	Aim	Number of papers reviewed	Qualities and relevance of studies included score
Physiopathological consequences
17	1996	Scully and Epstein	Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol	Narrative – To discuss the etiopathogenesis and current means available for preventing, ameliorating, and treating these complications, as well as indicating research directions	282	+++
18	2000	Sreebny	Int Dent J	Systematic – This paper reviews the role of saliva, the prevalence of oral dryness, and consequent importance of salivary flow as well as the relationship between xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction among the causes of oral dryness. Other aspects: associations between saliva and Sjögren’s syndrome and esophageal function; use of saliva as diagnostic tool	134	+++
Radiation-induced changes of saliva
23	1977	Dreizen et al	Postgrad Med	Narrative – To evaluate the main injury to surrounding tissues during radiotherapy for oral cancer that can have devastating physical and psychological consequences for the patients	13	++
Radiotherapy clinical consequences
45	1994	Atkinson and Wu	J Am Dent Assoc	Narrative – To evaluate the three most common known causes (medication, radiotherapy, and Sjögren’s syndrome) of salivary gland dysfunction and their clinical management	62	+++
47	2002	Pedersen et al	Oral Dis	Narrative – This paper reviews the role of human saliva and its compositional elements in relation to the gastrointestinal functions of taste, mastication, bolus formation, enzymatic digestion, and swallowing	161	+
41	2013	Radvansky et al	Am J Health Syst Pharm	Narrative – To evaluate current strategies for preventing and managing radiation-induced dermatitis, mucositis, and xerostomia, with an emphasis on pharmacologic interventions	52	++

Notes: +++, high level; ++, medium level; +, low level.

Physiopathological consequences

A total of six articles reported the physiopathological effects of radiotherapy on salivary glands parenchyma: one systematic review, one narrative review, one pilot study, one animal experimentation study, and one cohort study.16–20 Radiotherapy-induced xerostomia could be considered a multifactorial disease. On the one hand, the damage to the oral cavity has been strongly related to the radiation dose, fraction size, volume of irradiated tissue, fractionation scheme, and type of ionizing irradiation, but on the other, it may be difficult to distinguish changes caused by radiotherapy itself from those related to the malignant disease, the concomitant systemic diseases, and the medication needed for the treatment of the cancer.16,17

The salivary glands are superficially located compared to most head and neck tumors, and thus, the ionizing radiation has to pass through the salivary glands to effectively treat the tumor.18 Tissues with a rapid turnover rate are more susceptible than tissues with a slow one and even with the most accurate therapeutic protocol, X-rays cause unwanted changes in non-tumoral tissues. Despite the fact that salivary gland cells turnover is slow, production and quality of saliva change after radiation, so they are not as radioresistant as they are supposed to be.19 There are differences among the various types of salivary glands; in fact, the submandibular gland is less radiosensitive than the parotid gland.20 From this point of view, the most severe and irreversible forms of salivary gland hypofunction result from the damage/loss of salivary acinar cells, giving rise to rapid and predictable compositional changes, and reduction in saliva production and in the quality of the flow.

Radiation-induced changes in saliva

Nineteen articles analyzed the effects of the radiotherapy on salivary flow and composition, and the changes in microbial population: one narrative review, four randomized controlled trials, nine cohort studies, and five cross-sectional studies.21–40

Salivary flow

One of the main problems resulting from tissue damage generated by radiotherapy is the reduction of salivary flow. The radiation level necessary to cause severe dysfunction to gland tissue is >52 Gy. Below this threshold, the radiation damage generally has a transient and reversible duration.12 Routinely, HNC patients receive a total of 50–70 Gy, the radiation dose normally used to destroy malignant cells, which very often leads to the onset of chronic xerostomia.21 The major reduction in salivation after radiotherapy is observed in the period from the onset of radiotherapy to 3 months after completion. During radiotherapy, the first 10 days are the worst ones as a massive decrease in saliva production occurs; especially in the first week, it could reduce by 50%–60%.22 After this period, the flow rate is reduced by <10% of the initial conditions.23

Chemical and immunochemical alterations

Radiotherapy can also induce alterations in electrolytes and antibacterial systems. Salivary electrolyte levels are altered, with an increase in the concentrations of sodium, chloride, calcium, and magnesium, while potassium is only slightly affected.24 Saliva also reduces the buffering capacity in irradiated patients due to a reduction of bicarbonate concentration in parotid saliva.25,26 Saliva becomes, moreover, highly viscous, and reduces its pH from about 7.0 to 5.025,27 with slow recovery to the neutral pH in dental plaque after a sugar rinse.28,29 The permanence of the acidic pH in dental plaque was related to the reduced buccal gland saliva flow30 as the secretion from the buccal glands, closely delivered to the teeth surfaces, could affect the dental plaque more than the whole saliva during resting conditions.

Changes also involve the nonimmune and immune antibacterial systems. The concentrations of immunoproteins (eg, secretory immunoglobulin A), lysozyme, and lactoferrin are increased, as well as the serum and non-salivary components.31–34 However, the decrease in salivary flow rate is greater than the increase in immunoprotein and lysozyme levels, and this results in significant immunoprotein deficit. Since the reduction of the oral clearance, immunologic mechanisms and buffering capacity of saliva are altered, and the host protection decreases giving rise to changes in the oral flora.35

Microbial changes

All of these radiation-induced changes cause a different oral flora growth and acidogenic, cariogenic microorganisms are more present than non-cariogenic microorganisms. Unfortunately, even if there is an increase in immunoprotein and lysozyme levels, a significant immunoprotein deficit occurs due to the decrease in salivary flow rate. Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus spp., and Candida spp. are the most prevalent in the plaque of irradiated patients.30,36–38 In a longitudinal study, Brown et al assessed the effects of radiation-induced xerostomia on the human oral microflora and on the subsequent development of dental caries.35 Five intraoral specimens consisting of resting saliva, gingival sulcus fluid, dental plaque, lingual swabs, and stimulated whole saliva were collected from each patient two times during 1 week before radiation, one time per week during radiotherapy, at 3-month intervals during the first postradiation year, and at 6-month intervals thereafter. During irradiation, the development of xerostomia was matched by a parallel and pronounced shift in certain microbial populations at each intraoral site assessed. The most prominent changes were the increase in S. mutans and species of Lactobacillus, Candida (primarily Candida albicans), and Staphylococcus, with parallel decreases in Streptococcus sanguis and species of Neisseria and Fusobacterium. Microbial differences were relatively minimal between the groups of patients receiving radiotherapy who used a fluoride gel and a nonfluoride gel during the irradiation period. However, there was a more rapid decrease in the level of S. sanguis in the plaque of the patients using the nonfluoride gel compared with those patients using the fluoride gel, and the subsequent development of dental caries differed greatly. The increased number of Lactobacilli was correlated to a high acidic potential of the plaque and the use of fluoride was associated with a protective effect in the prevention of dental decay during xerostomia.

The findings that a high frequency, number, and proportion of Lactobacillus spp. occur in irradiated patients were strengthened by a study of Almståhl et al who analyzed the saliva oral microbiota in subjects with hyposalivation using a rinsing technique and a cultivation technique. Results indicated that the salivary secretion rate, pH, and buffer capacity were the more important factors in the increase in Lactobacillus spp. A marked increase in C. albicans was also characteristic of the irradiated patients.39

In a more recent study, Almståhl et al evaluated the frequency of different Lactobacillus spp. in relation to the pH-lowering potential of the supra-gingival plaque in irradiated patients in comparison to primary Sjögren’s syndrome patients and controls with normal salivary secretion.40 The irradiated subjects had finished their bilateral radiation treatment (64.6 Gy) 3–5 years before participating in the study. Interproximal plaque pH was measured by the microtouch method30 before and up to 60 minutes after a 10% sugar rinse.29 The measurements were performed at two sites: in the anterior and in the premolar/molar region. Data indicated that the most common species were Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Lactobacillus casei. In anterior sites, both the hyposalivated group subjects with high Lactobacillus counts had an increased plaque acidogenicity compared to those with low counts. In posterior sites, subjects with high Lactobacillus counts had a lower final pH compared with those with low counts. Authors concluded that hyposalivation patients often harbor several different Lactobacillus spp. in their supragingival plaque. There were, however, large differences in number and proportion of Lactobacilli between individuals and between anterior and posterior dental sites, but no specific species could be related to plaque acidogenicity.

Radiotherapy clinical consequences

In eleven articles, the clinical consequences that may arise as a result of HNC radiotherapy have been described: three narrative reviews, one randomized clinical trial, one animal experimentation study, four cohort studies, and two cross-sectional studies.20,36,41–50 Radiotherapy can cause some temporary side effects. Although these may be worse if the treatment is combined with chemotherapy, they gradually disappear after the treatment has finished. Most radiotherapy side effects occur toward the middle and end of the course of treatment and continue during the first couple of weeks after the treatment. The effects can be mild or more troublesome, depending on the dose of radiotherapy and the length of treatment. Thus, the quantitative and qualitative salivary changes predispose the irradiated patient to a variety of problems.

Radiotherapy in HNC is inevitably associated with damages to the oral tissues and, in addition, the clinical consequences of radiotherapy include also dermatitis and osteoradionecrosis.41 In fact, salivary glands are often involved and, as a result, patients may have a salivary gland hypofunction, even if 3D planning and unilateral irradiation have considerably reduced the side effects by minimizing the dose to normal tissues. However, the final degree of damage to gland tissue depends on individual patient characteristics, such as pretreatment already done, age, and sex.

Xerostomia may affect 80% of the patients who need radiotherapy as a primary treatment, as an adjunct to surgery, in combination with chemotherapy, or as palliation.42–44 Hyposalivation represents the biggest acute side effect in HNC radiotherapy and, in general, is always associated with oral function problems, such as chewing and swallowing, or caries at a later stage. Normally, during radiotherapy, salivary composition may change and it becomes more viscous than usual, so its color may turn yellow, brown, or even white (Figure 2). Furthermore, salivary glands with high flow rates before the initiation of radiotherapy show less reduction in salivary flow rate. As a consequence of the reduction in the rate of saliva flow, which is correlated to the amount of radiation given to the patient, oral complications occur.20

Figure 2

Viscous appearance of the saliva in a radiotherapeutic patient.

The buccal mucosa has a dry and sticky appearance (Figure 3). The normally moist, glistening appearance of the oral cavity is often replaced with a thin, pale, cracked appearance that is more susceptible to gingivitis and bleeding. Another frequent acute side effect is oral mucositis, which can be experienced by >50% of patients receiving HNC radiotherapy. Some typical side effects are onset of erythema, edema, and pain in the oral mucosa.41 Patients may also exhibit a dry irritated tongue with an erythematous appearance of the dorsal surface, the hard or soft palate, the commissures of the mouth, and under-removable prostheses.43 Furthermore, the lack of saliva may lead to angular cheilitis, cracked lips (Figure 4), periodontal disease, aching of the mouth, and halitosis.

Figure 3

Dry and sticky appearance of oral mucosa in a radiotherapeutic patient.

Figure 4

Cheilitis and cracked lips, and teeth cervical caries in a radiotherapeutic patient.

When part or all of the mouth is treated, the sense of taste may change quickly during the radiotherapy, and some patients may even either lose their sense of taste completely or find that everything tastes the same (usually rather metallic or salty). Changes in taste are correlated to the direct irradiation of the taste buds, and also to the reduction in salivary flow rate that alters the ionic composition of saliva that is related to the sensation of taste.46

Moreover, the loss of saliva compromises mastication and nutrition. Some patients lose their appetite as a general effect of radiotherapy. Dryness of the mouth and lips can cause discomfort, ranging from a mild irritation to a severe burning sensation with difficulties in normal eating habits, particularly eating spicy or acidic food. A sore, dry mouth can also make eating and swallowing difficult because moistening of food is insufficient and oral mucosa surfaces are not wet and not lubricated enough.47

Furthermore, an insufficient lubrication, due to a diminished salivary output, causes intolerance to prosthetic appliances, so more friction is present between the mucosa and the resin that can injure the delicate irradiated epithelial layer. In addition, the inadequate presence of saliva weakens the stability of prostheses in the mouth. Ulceration is more likely because the dry mucosa is more vulnerable to trauma.

A further complication that tends to occur later in irradiated patients is the increased risk of developing dental caries and oral infections, due to the alterations in the saliva flow and consequently in oral microflora.36 The decay is most often recurrent or primary and located at sites generally not usually susceptible to caries such as the cervical margins, incisal margins, or the tips of teeth (Figure 4).

Another issue is the high incidence of yeast infections during xerostomia.48 An example being the C. albicans infection, which is very common in both dentate and edentulous individuals and allows a colonization of oral mucosae49 increasing the risk of oral mucosal infections.50

Another acute side effect of radiotherapy is dermatitis, which can be experienced by up to 95% of patients.41 The skin over the face and neck is very likely to gradually redden or darken and become sore. At the same time, the mouth and throat become sore and inflamed after a couple of weeks of treatment and mouth ulcers may occur; the voice may also become hoarse.

Discussion

The treatment of xerostomia has four aims: increasing existing saliva flow or replacing lost secretions, the control of the state of oral health, the control of dental caries, and the treatment of possible infections.51

Therapy options in xerostomia depend on the presence of residual secretion or the absence of it. When residual secretory capacity is present, it is advisable to regularly stimulate the salivary glands by mechanical or gustatory stimuli as supportive oral care. The use of sugarless chewing gum or candy-containing xylitol or sorbitol can be recommended as a means of stimulating extra salivary flow to aid caries management and lubrication. Nocturnal oral dryness can be alleviated by applying a small amount of dentifrice on smooth dental surfaces, especially using anti-xerostomia dentifrices that contain three salivary enzymes, lactoperoxidase, glucose oxidase, and lysozyme, specifically formulated to activate intraoral bacterial systems.

The salivary flow can also be stimulated by the use of cholinergic pharmaceutical preparations, such as pilocarpine or cevimeline. These two parasympathomimetic drugs are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of xerostomia; pilocarpine is approved for Sjögren’s syndrome and radiotherapy-induced xerostomia, while cevimeline seems to be more specific for Sjögren’s syndrome. Pilocarpine, a natural alkaloid, is a parasympathomimetic agent with β-adrenergic effects that activates cholinergic receptors,52 stimulating the residual function of the salivary glands. The recommended dose is 5 mg orally three times a day.53 Severe adverse effects are rare, but side effects associated with the use of the drug are vomiting, sweating, headache, increased urinary frequency, wheezing, watery eyes, and nausea, and gastrointestinal intolerance. Hypotension, rhinitis, diarrhea, and visual disturbances can also occur.54,55 Normally, these are moderate in intensity and last for a short period of time. Patients with asthma, high blood pressure, heart diseases, and in therapy with β-blockers cannot use pilocarpine because this drug is a nonselective antagonist of muscarinic receptors and, therefore, it can interfere with the cardiac and respiratory functions in those patients. For the same reason, pilocarpine, stimulating muscarinic receptors in the central nervous system, can cause onset of agitation, confusion, and parkinsonian-like syndromes.56

Cevimeline is analogous to acetylcholine, which binds to muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in exocrine glands, specifically the M1 and M3 subtypes present, for instance, in the epithelium of the salivary and lachrymal glands, leading to an increase in exocrine gland secretion including saliva and sweat. M2 and M4 receptor sites predominate in cardiac and respiratory tissues. This receptor subtype selectivity is presumed to mitigate the systemic adverse effects of muscarinic–cholinergic stimulation.56 It is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, reaching peak concentrations in approximately 90 minutes without food. The duration of its sialogogic effect seems to be unclear. Clinical trials have shown it to be more effective than placebos in relieving the symptoms of a dry mouth. The recommended dose is 30 mg orally three times a day, but in two clinical trials, it has been shown that the use of cevimeline in treating radiation-induced xerostomia, increasing the dose to 45 mg, was well tolerated by patients, with an increase of unstimulated salivary flow.57,58 This medication is not recommended for patients with uncontrolled asthma, narrow-angle glaucoma, or iritis. Excessive sweating and nausea are the most frequently reported adverse effects with cevimeline. Rhinitis, diarrhea, and visual disturbances, especially at night, can also occur.

Another medication is anethole trithione that is a bile secretion-stimulating drug, or cholagogue. It increases the secretion of acetylcholine and stimulates the parasympathetic nervous system, and so as a result, we have the stimulation of salivation from serous acinar cells. This medication has been used for many years in the treatment of chronic xerostomia, but reports differ regarding its efficacy. While some studies report improvements in salivary flow rates in drug-induced xerostomia, trials in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome show conflicting results. Side effects reported include abdominal discomfort and flatulence. Dosages of 75 mg three times daily may be effective in treating patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms of xerostomia, but further research is needed to establish its safety and efficacy in this setting.59

Yohimbine has also been used in patients with xerostomia and it is an alpha-2 adrenergic antagonist, which induces an increase in cholinergic activity peripherally. In one randomized, double-blind, crossover study, the effect of this medication was compared to that of anethole trithione in patients treated with psychotropic medications. Patients given yohimbine 6 mg three times daily for 5 days showed significantly increased saliva flow (P<0.01) when compared with anethole trithione 25 mg three times daily.60

Human interferon alfa (IFN-α) is currently undergoing clinical trials to determine the safety and efficacy of low-dose lozenges in the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction and xerostomia. In one study, IFN-α lozenges at dosages of 150 IU given three times daily for 12 weeks resulted in a significant increase in stimulated whole saliva (P=0.04) when compared with placebos.61

If some residual function of salivary glands remains, acupuncture could be a good alternative treatment for alleviating radio-induced xerostomia.62 The way this works remains poorly understood, but it seems that acupuncture modulates central nervous system processes,63 increasing the concentration of salivary neuropeptides, which seem capable of modulating the complex process of salivary secretion.64 There are some studies that provide encouraging results, suggesting an effective increase in salivary flow, while others do not detect statistically significant differences in the increase in salivary flow between the treated subjects and controls.65 However, the results of systematic reviews do not indicate the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of xerostomia due to the current lack of relevant randomized clinical trials.64–67

When stimulation of salivary secretion fails, patients can be given palliative oral care in the form of application of mouthwashes and saliva substitutes. Although the daily use of a mouthwash or one of the saliva substitutes that are formulated to mimic natural saliva, is strongly recommended, they do not stimulate salivary gland production. Commercially available products come in a variety of formulations including solutions, sprays, gels, and lozenges. In general, they contain an agent to increase viscosity, such as carboxymethylcellulose or hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, hydroxyethylcellulose, and polyglycerylmethacrylate,65 minerals such as calcium and phosphate ions and fluoride, preservatives such as methyl or propylparaben, and flavoring and related agents.

Also homeopathic remedies such as olive oil, aloe vera gel, and rape oil spray may be effective alternatives in the palliative management of xerostomic patients.68,69

In order to minimize problems related to the absence of or reduced secretion of saliva, all patients should be encouraged to take an active role in the management of their xerostomia; so a daily mouth examination, checking for red, white, or dark patches, ulcers, or tooth decay, is highly recommended.

Patients with reduced saliva should also be encouraged to consider visiting their dentist more frequently because they have got a greater susceptibility to dental problems. Teeth should be cleaned at least twice a day, so brushing and flossing regularly and the daily use of fluoride and chlorhexidine rinses may also be useful in preventing caries by reducing amounts of Streptococcus and Lactobacillus in the mouth. For daily use, a special dentifrice (eg, children’s toothpaste or anti-xerostomia dentifrices) is recommended, since the taste of a regular dentifrice may be too strong for these patients.

Dentures and acrylic appliances should not be worn during sleep and they should be kept clean by soaking them overnight in chlorhexidine. Sometimes, lubricants, Vaseline and/or glycerin based, put on the lips and under dentures, may relieve drying, cracking, soreness, and mucosal trauma.61

Patients with decreased salivary flow should also be made aware of the necessity to comply with suggested oral hygiene regimens after exposure to acid-producing food sources. Recommendations for professional and home fluoride treatments should be considered carefully for patients with salivary dysfunction, especially those with high caries rates and exposed root surfaces. A modified diet can be useful to minimize the effects of xerostomia; for instance, they should avoid sugary or acidic foods and also avoid dry, spicy, astringent, or excessively hot or cold foods that are more irritating, while eating foods such as carrots or celery may also help patients with residual salivary gland function. The addition of flavor enhancers such as herbs, condiments, and fruit extracts may make food more palatable to patients complaining of their food tasting bland, papery, salty, or otherwise unpleasant; at the same time, taking frequent sips of water throughout the day and sucking on ice chips are helpful.70

Conclusion

The resulting salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia arising from radiotherapy for HNC can cause a serious diseased condition. The stomatologic complications could depend on the type of cancer treatment and the cumulative radiation dose to the gland tissue. They can be reversible or irreversible, transient, or enduring. The best approach to manage the radiotherapeutic patient begins with a careful clinical assessment of the individual case, followed by preventive therapy aimed to reduce oral complications when possible. Therefore, the clinician must keep this kind of patients under careful control in order to palliate the symptoms of xerostomia and improve their quality of life.