Literature DB >> 25689266

Bioactivity and bone healing properties of biomimetic porous composite scaffold: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Francesca Veronesi1, Gianluca Giavaresi1,2, Vincenzo Guarino3, Maria Grazia Raucci3, Monica Sandri4, Anna Tampieri4, Luigi Ambrosio3, Milena Fini1,2.   

Abstract

Tissue engineering (TE) represents a valid alternative to traditional surgical therapies for the management of bone defects that do not regenerate spontaneously. Scaffolds, one of the most important component of TE strategy, should be biocompatible, bioactive, osteoconductive, and osteoinductive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biological properties and bone regeneration ability of a porous poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffold, incorporating MgCO3 -doped hydroxyapatite particles, uncoated (PCL_MgCHA) or coated by apatite-like crystals via biomimetic treatment (PCL_MgCHAB). It was observed that both scaffolds are not cytotoxic and, even if cell viability was similar on both scaffolds, PCL_MgCHAB showed higher alkaline phosphatase and collagen I (COLL I) production at day 7. PCL_MgCHA induced more tumor necrosis factor-α release than PCL_MgCHAB, while osteocalcin was produced less by both scaffolds up to 7 days and no significant differences were observed for transforming growth factor-β synthesis. The percentage of new bone trabeculae growth in wide defects carried out in rabbit femoral distal epiphyses was significantly higher in PCL_MgCHAB in comparison with PCL_MgCHA at 4 weeks and even more at 12 weeks after implantation. This study highlighted the role of a biomimetic composite scaffold in bone regeneration and lays the foundations for its future employment in the clinical practice.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomaterials; bone cells; bone regeneration; composite scaffolds; histomorphometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25689266     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  6 in total

Review 1.  Strategies Developed to Induce, Direct, and Potentiate Bone Healing.

Authors:  Anne-Margaux Collignon; Julie Lesieur; Christian Vacher; Catherine Chaussain; Gael Y Rochefort
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 2.  Bionic Design, Materials and Performance of Bone Tissue Scaffolds.

Authors:  Tong Wu; Suihuai Yu; Dengkai Chen; Yanen Wang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Mineralized Polyvinyl Alcohol/Sodium Alginate Hydrogels Incorporating Cellulose Nanofibrils for Bone and Wound Healing.

Authors:  Ragab E Abouzeid; Ahmed Salama; Esmail M El-Fakharany; Vincenzo Guarino
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields combined with a collagenous scaffold and bone marrow concentrate enhance osteochondral regeneration: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Francesca Veronesi; Matteo Cadossi; Gianluca Giavaresi; Lucia Martini; Stefania Setti; Roberto Buda; Sandro Giannini; Milena Fini
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Journey into Bone Models: A Review.

Authors:  Julia Scheinpflug; Moritz Pfeiffenberger; Alexandra Damerau; Franziska Schwarz; Martin Textor; Annemarie Lang; Frank Schulze
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Bone Healing in the Presence of a Biodegradable PBS-DLA Copolyester and Its Composite Containing Hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Piotr Prowans; Robert Kowalczyk; Barbara Wiszniewska; Norbert Czapla; Piotr Bargiel; Miroslawa El Fray
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-11-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.