Literature DB >> 25688995

Comparison of the genotoxic effects induced by 50 Hz extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields and 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in GC-2 cells.

Weixia Duan1, Chuan Liu, Lei Zhang, Mindi He, Shangcheng Xu, Chunhai Chen, Huifeng Pi, Peng Gao, Yanwen Zhang, Min Zhong, Zhengping Yu, Zhou Zhou.   

Abstract

Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) and radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) have been considered to be possibly carcinogenic to humans. However, their genotoxic effects remain controversial. To make experiments controllable and results comparable, we standardized exposure conditions and explored the potential genotoxicity of 50 Hz ELF-EMF and 1800 MHz RF-EMF. A mouse spermatocyte-derived GC-2 cell line was intermittently (5 min on and 10 min off) exposed to 50 Hz ELF-EMF at an intensity of 1, 2 or 3 mT or to RF-EMF in GSM-Talk mode at the specific absorption rates (SAR) of 1, 2 or 4 W/kg. After exposure for 24 h, we found that neither ELF-EMF nor RF-EMF affected cell viability using Cell Counting Kit-8. Through the use of an alkaline comet assay and immunofluorescence against γ-H2AX foci, we found that ELF-EMF exposure resulted in a significant increase of DNA strand breaks at 3 mT, whereas RF-EMF exposure had insufficient energy to induce such effects. Using a formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG)-modified alkaline comet assay, we observed that RF-EMF exposure significantly induced oxidative DNA base damage at a SAR value of 4 W/kg, whereas ELF-EMF exposure did not. Our results suggest that both ELF-EMF and RF-EMF under the same experimental conditions may produce genotoxicity at relative high intensities, but they create different patterns of DNA damage. Therefore, the potential mechanisms underlying the genotoxicity of different frequency electromagnetic fields may be different.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25688995     DOI: 10.1667/RR13851.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of the Low Frequency of the Electromagnetic Field on Human.

Authors:  Kawthar A Diab
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  ELF-MF exposure affects the robustness of epigenetic programming during granulopoiesis.

Authors:  Melissa Manser; Mohamad R Abdul Sater; Christoph D Schmid; Faiza Noreen; Manuel Murbach; Niels Kuster; David Schuermann; Primo Schär
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Microwaves from mobile phone induce reactive oxygen species but not DNA damage, preleukemic fusion genes and apoptosis in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells.

Authors:  Matus Durdik; Pavol Kosik; Eva Markova; Alexandra Somsedikova; Beata Gajdosechova; Ekaterina Nikitina; Eva Horvathova; Katarina Kozics; Devra Davis; Igor Belyaev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Field as a Stress Factor-Really Detrimental?-Insight into Literature from the Last Decade.

Authors:  Angelika Klimek; Justyna Rogalska
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-31

5.  Molecular Mechanism of Malignant Transformation of Balb/c-3T3 Cells Induced by Long-Term Exposure to 1800 MHz Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation (RF-EMR).

Authors:  Zhen Ding; Xiaoyong Xiang; Jintao Li; Shuicai Wu
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18

6.  Probing the Origins of 1,800 MHz Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation Induced Damage in Mouse Immortalized Germ Cells and Spermatozoa in vitro.

Authors:  Brendan J Houston; Brett Nixon; Bruce V King; R John Aitken; Geoffry N De Iuliis
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-09-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.