A high incidence of WT1 abnormality in bilateral Wilms tumours in Japan, and the penetrance rates in children with WT1 germline mutation.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral Wilms tumours (BWTs) occur by germline mutation of various predisposing genes; one of which is WT1 whose abnormality was reported in 17-38% of BWTs in Caucasians, whereas no such studies have been conducted in East-Asians. Carriers with WT1 mutations are increasing because of improved survival.
METHODS: Statuses of WT1 and IGF2 were examined in 45 BWTs from 31 patients with WT1 sequencing and SNP array-based genomic analyses. The penetrance rates were estimated in WT1-mutant familial Wilms tumours collected from the present and previous studies.
RESULTS: We detected WT1 abnormalities in 25 (81%) of 31 patients and two families, which were included in the penetrance rate analysis of familial Wilms tumour. Of 35 BWTs from the 25 patients, 31 had small homozygous WT1 mutations and uniparental disomy of IGF2, while 4 had large 11p13 deletions with the retention of 11p heterozygosity. The penetrance rate was 100% if children inherited small WT1 mutations from their fathers, and 67% if inherited the mutations from their mothers, or inherited or had de novo 11p13 deletions irrespective of parental origin (P=0.057).
CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of WT1 abnormalities in Japanese BWTs sharply contrasts with the lower incidence in Caucasian counterparts, and the penetrance rates should be clarified for genetic counselling of survivors with WT1 mutations.

Wilms tumour (WT; OMIM 194070) arises from the developmental kidney (Rivera and Haber, 2005). Wilms tumour and retinoblastoma are typical embryonal tumours. The WT1 gene was altered in <25% of sporadic WTs (Haruta ), whereas the RB1 gene was shown to be altered in >90% of hereditary and non-hereditary retinoblastoma (Leiderman ), indicating genetic heterogeneity and homogeneity of WT and retinoblastoma, respectively. Bilateral WT is thought to be hereditary, and the germinal mutation of WT1 located in 11p13 and alterations of 11p15 were reported in 17–38% and 55%, respectively, of bilateral WTs in the series reported from USA, UK and Australia (Huff, 1998; Scott ; Hu ). Carriers with WT1 mutations are now increasing because multidisciplinary therapies have improved the survival rates of patients with bilateral WTs and those with a unilateral WT (UWT) with a WT1 germline mutation (Royer-Pokora ; Hu ). The penetrance rates of WT1-mutant familial WT (FWT) are needed for genetic counselling of WT survivors. However, investigators have never examined the incidence of WT1 and 11p15 abnormalities in bilateral WTs of East Asian children, and have not yet tried to estimate the penetrance rates of WT1-mutant FWT.

WT1 is a multifunctional protein that acts as a transcriptional activator or repressor, is predominantly expressed in the embryonic kidney, and plays a pivotal role in its development (Huff, 2011). Insulin-like growth factor II (IGF2; OMIM 147470) is an imprinted gene expressed by the paternal allele, and encodes a foetal polypeptide growth factor (Foulstone ). In contrast, WT1 is biallelically expressed in normal foetal tissues and WTs (Little ). The loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and loss of imprinting (LOI) of IGF2 have been reported in 30–40% and 30–70% of sporadic WTs, respectively, and these alterations cause the overexpression of IGF2, which is involved in Wilms tumorigenesis (Schroeder ; Ravenel ; Haruta ).

Both WT1 and IGF2 genes are located on the short arm of chromosome 11 (11p) and uniparental disomy (UPD) on 11p, involving either the region limited to 11p15 or that including both 11p15 and 11p13, is regularly accompanied by maternal allele loss and paternal allele duplication (Schroeder ). We previously reported that small homozygous WT1 mutations and paternal UPD (pUPD) of 11p occurred in one-third of unilateral and bilateral WTs with various WT1 abnormalities (Haruta ). Based on these genetic findings of human WT, Hu showed that the combined occurrence of the upregulation of Igf2 and ablation of Wt1 resulted in WT in transgenic Wt1-Igf2 mice; however, the upregulation of Igf2 or ablation of Wt1 by themselves did not lead to malignant tumours .

The inheritance of WT1 mutations have been poorly studied in FWTs, and only 13 hereditary WT families with WT1 abnormalities have been described in the literature (Yunis and Ramsay, 1980; Kousseff and Agatucci, 1981; Nakagome ; Lavedan ; Pelletier ; Kaplinsky ; Jeanpierre ; Pritchard-Jones ; Shibata ; Zirn ; Regev ; Fencl ; Melchionda ). In addition, the parental origins of de novo small WT1 mutations and large 11p13 deletions encompassing WT1 were reported previously in two and eight individuals, respectively (Huff ; Nordenskjold ). The aim of the present study was to determine the incidence rates of WT1 and IGF2 abnormalities in bilateral WTs in Japanese children, and was to compare the results with those reported in bilateral WTs of Caucasian children. In addition, we summarised the present and previous findings on the penetrance rate for children who inherited various types of WT1 abnormalities from their fathers or mothers, or had de novo WT1 (DNWT1) abnormalities that occurred in the paternal or maternal germ cell, and tried to clarify whether parental inheritance and WT1 abnormality types may affect the penetrance rate of hereditary WT.

Materials and Methods

Patients and samples

Forty-five tumour samples were available from 31 Japanese infants or children with bilateral WT, ranging in age between 2 and 26 months, who underwent surgery or biopsy between August 1996 and 2011 (Table 1); 11 of the 45 tumours and 7 of the 31 patients were described in a previous series of patients with WT1-mutant WT (Shibata ; Haruta ). In one of the seven patients, data on the 11p15 status was added and shown as Bilateral Wilms tumour 23 (BWT23) (Table 1; Shibata ). In addition, five patients, including one with UWT of a DNWT1 mutation (UWTG1), one with familial and UWTG2, one with Wilms tumour–aniridia–genitourinary malformation-mental retardation (WAGR) syndrome-associated UWTG8 and two with sporadic and UWTS1 and 5 were incorporated into our previous study for a comparison of the data with those of WT1-mutant bilateral WTs (Table 2). Normal tissue samples were obtained from either peripheral blood (PB) or normal renal tissue adjacent to the tumour from the same patients. Tumours were staged according to the National Wilms Tumor Study Group (NWTS) staging system and most patients were treated according to the NWTS protocols (D'Angio ; Oue ). Malformations found in patients with bilateral WT are listed in Table 1. None of the patients in the present study showed hemihypertrophy or malformations associated with Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome (BWS; OMIM#130650). One (BWT9) died of the disease, another (BWT27) with premature chromatid separation (PCS) syndrome died of infection (Matsuura ) and 29 were alive at the last follow-up.

Table 1

Genetic and epigenetic alterations in IGF2 (11p15) and WT1 (11p13) loci in 31 patients with bilateral Wilms tumours

Tumour	Age/sex	11p15 SNP	H19- DMR	IGF2 Status	WT1 allele 1	WT1 allele 2	Other CGH changes	Anomaly/reference/heredity
BWT1R	1 year 1 month/F	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C)	pUPD	ex 1, 370C>T/G124X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	del(7)(q11.1q21.11)	None
BWT2L	1 year 2 months/F	ROH	Normal Methyl. (C)	ROI	Deletion of 21.8 Mb	Deletion spanning exons 4–9	None	WAGR syndrome/No. 1a
BWT2R	—	ROH	Normal methyl. (C)	ROI	Deletion of 21.8 Mb	ex 7, 927-956del30ins5/T309fs379X	None	WAGR syndrome/No. 16a
BWT3R	1 year 2 months/M	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPD	Deletion in ex 1∼5	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	UPD3pter-3p14.2,7p-q+	None/No. 2a
BWT4L	12 months/M	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C)	pUPDb	ex 9, 1168C>T/R390X	The same as allele 1, UPD (MLPA)	NE	None
BWT4R	—	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPDb	ex 9, 1168C>T/R390X	The same as allele 1, UPD, 11 pt-p13	7p-q+	None
BWT5L	9 months/M	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPD	ex 9, 1168C>T/R390X	The same as allele 1, UPD 11pter-p12	None	Hypospadia/cryptorchidism/No. 26a
BWT6R	12 months/M	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPD	IVS1+1G>A	The same as allele 1, UPD (MLPA)	NE	None
BWT7R	7 months/F	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPDb	ex 1, 268delA/S90Afs128X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None	None
BWT8R	2 months/M	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPDb	ex 3, 646delC/L216Cfs2X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	1q+	None
BWT9L	1 year 1 month/M	ROH	Normal Methyl. (C)	ROI	ex 1, 172delC/P58Rfs32X	Deletion of 1.6 Mb	None	Urogenital anomaly/No. 19a
BWT9R	—	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPD	ex 1, 172delC/P58Rfs32X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	UPD17q21.33-qter	Urogenital anomaly/No. 31a
BWT10L	1 year 2 months/F	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C)	pUPDb	ex 9, 1186G>A/D396N	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11p12	None	Drash syndrome/No. 32a
BWT10R	—	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C)	pUPDb	ex 9, 1186G>A/D396N	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	UPD3pter-p21.33	Drash syndrome/No. 33a
BWT11L	12 months/F	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPDb	ex 7, 938C>A/S313X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None	None
BWT11R	—	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPDb	ex 7, 938C>A/S313X	The same as allele 1, UPD (MLPA)	NE	None
BWT12R	11 months/F	UPD	Hypermethyl. (M)	pUPD	ex 6, 818C>G/Y271X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None	None
BWT13L	12 months/M	UPD	Hypermethyl. (M)	pUPD	IVS2-1G>A	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	UPD3pt-3p21	None
BWT13R	—	UPD	Hypermethyl. (M)	pUPD	IVS2-1G>A	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11p13	None	None
BWT14L	11 months/F	UPD	Hypermethyl. (M)	pUPDb	ex 9, 1180C>T/R394W	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None	Drash syndrome
BWT15L	9 months/M	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPD	ex 8, deletion	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None	None
BWT15R	—	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPD	ex 8, deletion	The same as allele 1 (UPD)/11pt-p13	None	None
BWT16L	12 months/M	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C)	pUPD	ex 8, 1084C>T/R362X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None	None
BWT17	12 months/M	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C)	pUPD	ex 1, 97_98ins5/Q32Rfs59X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	7p-q+	None
BWT18L	11 months/F	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPDb	ex 4, 714G>A/W238X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None	None
BWT18R	—	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPDb	ex 4, 714G>A/W238X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11p12	UPD3pt-3p21	None
BWT19R	1 year 2 months/F	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPDb	ex 4, 682delC/Q228Kfs2X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None	None
BWT20L	1 year 1 month/F	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPD	ex 9, 1168C>T/R390X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11p13	None	None
BWT20R	—	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPD	ex 9, 1168C>T/R390X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None	None
BWT21R	10 months/F	UPD	N. D.	UPD	ex 9, 1180C>T/R394W	The same as allele 1, UPD (MLPA)	NE	Drash syndrome
BWT22R	2 years 2 months/M	ROH	Normal Methyl. (C)	ROIb	Deletion of 3.2 Mb	IVS6+1-IVS6+3del3	3p-,4q-,7p-	Hypospadia/cryptorchidism
BWT23L	7 months/F	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPD	ex 9, 1168C>T/R390Xc	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11p12	None	OD, FGS/No. 5d//FWT1
BWT23R	—	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPD	ex 9, 1168C>T/R390Xc	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None	OD, FGS/No. 5d/FWT1
BWT24R	1 year 8 months/F	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPDb	ex 1, 144C>A/Y48Xc	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	7p-,7p-q+, 9q-	de novo mutation/No. 36a,e/DNWT9-2
BMT25L	1 year 7 months/F	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPDb	ex 9, 1168C>T/R390Xc	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	1q+	None/FWT2-2
BWT26L	7 months/M	ROH	Normal Methyl. (C)	ROI	Wild type	Wild type	UPD1q	None
BWT26R	—	ROH	Normal Methyl. (C)	ROI	Wild type	Wild type	UPD1q	None
BWT27R	10 months/M	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPD	Wild type	Wild type	+2,UPD11,+12,+17,+18	PCS syndrome
BWT28L	1 year 1 month/M	ROH	Hypermethyl. (C)	LOI	Wild type	Wild type	Normal	None
BWT28R	—	ROH	Hypermethyl. (C)	LOI	Wild type	Wild type	+6,+12	None
BWT29	9 months/F	ROH	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	LOIb	Wild type	Wild type	1q+,4p+,+7,7q-,UPD8,UPD9,+10,+12,15q+,+20,UPD22	None
BWT30L	1 year 5 months/F	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C, M)	pUPDb	Wild type	Wild type	+8,+10,UPD11,+12	Coarctation of the aorta
BWT30R		ROH	Normal Methyl. (C)	ROIb	Wild type	Wild type	UPD2,+5,+7,+8,-10,+12,+18	Coarctation of the aorta
BWT31L	1 year 2 months/F	UPD	Hypermethyl. (C)	pUPD	Wild type	Wild type	1q+,+3,+6,+8,+9,UPD11pt-11cen,+12,+13,16q	None
BWT31R		ROH	Normal Methyl. (C)	ROI	Wild type	Wild type	Normal	None

Abbreviations: BWT=bilateral Wilms tumour; C=methylation analysis of CTCF6 by COBRA; CGH=comparative genomic hybridisation; COBRA=combined bisulfite restriction assay; DMR=differentially methylated region; ex=exon; F=female; FGS=focal glomerular sclerosis; FWT1=familial WT1; LOI=loss of imprinting; M=male; M, methylation analysis of H19-DMR by MS-MLPA; methyl.=methylation; MLPA=multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification; ; NE=not examined; PB=peripheral blood; PCS=premature chromatid separation; pUPD=paternal IGF2 UPD; ROH=retention of heterozygosity; ROI=retention of IGF2 imprinting; SNP=single-nucleotide polymorphism; UPD=uniparental disomy; WAGR=Wilms tumour−aniridia−genitourinary malformation-mental retardation.

See Table 3 for FWT1.

Case numbers reported by Haruta .

Above pUPD, LOI or ROI indicates that normal methylation pattern at H19-DMR was identified in PB by COBRA.

Germline origin of the mutation was confirmed.

Case number reported by Shibata .

Stage was corrected from I to V in the present Table 1.

Table 2

Genetic and epigenetic alterations in IGF2 (11p15) and WT1 (11p13) loci in 10 syndromic or familial and 20 sporadic patients with unilateral Wilms tumours

Tumour	Age/sex	Stage	IGF2	WT1 allele 1	WT1 allele 2	Malformations/heredity	References
Patients with syndromic or familial unilateral Wilms tumours (n=10)
UWTG1	1 year 6 months/F	I	UPDa	ex 1, 144C>A/Y48Xb	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None/de novo mutation (DNWT9-1)	The present study
UWTG2	1 year 4 months/M	I	pUPD (C)	ex 9, 1168C>T/R390Xb	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	Hypospadia/familial WT (FWT2-1)	The present study
UWTG3	12 months/F	I	pUPD (C)	ex 8, 1604G>A/C355Y	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen)	Drash syndrome	No. 29 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTG4	1 year 9 months/F	III	pUPD (C)	ex 3, 665_666delinsT/S222fs299X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	Hermaphroditism	No. 35 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTG5	9 months/F	II	pUPD (C)	ex 2, 549C>T/Q184Xb	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None/None	No. 25 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTG6	1 year 7 months/F	III	ROH/ROI (C)	Deletion of 2.4 Mb	ex 10, 1297–1298insT/R433fsNo-stop	WAGR syndrome	No. 20 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTG7	5 months/F	I	ROH/LOI (C)	Deletion of 6.5 Mb	ex 9, 1180C>G/ R394G	WAGR syndrome	No. 14 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTG8	1 year 3 months/M	I	ROH/ROI (C)	Deletion spanning exons 1–10	ex 4, 721_730del10/M309fs313X	WAGR syndrome	The present study
UWTG9	1 year 3 months/M	I	ROH/ROI (C)	Deletion of 4.4 Mb	ex 7, 938-939ins8/S313fs380X	WAGR syndrome	No. 17 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTG10	1 year 3 months/F	III	ROH/ROI (C)	Deletion of 14.4 Mb	ex 7,938C>A/S307X	WAGR syndrome	No. 18 (Haruta et al, 2008)
Patients with sporadic and unilateral Wilms tumours (n=20)
UWTS1	1 year 5 months/F	I	pUPD (C)	ex 1, 231_232insC/W78fs53X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None/None	The present study
UWTS2	1 year 4 months/F	IV	pUPD (C)	ex 8, 1068_1069ins23/F357fs380X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None/None	No. 34 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS3	9 months/F	I	pUPD (C)	ex 1, 204_206delinsCC/P68fs162X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None/None	No. 27 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS4	9 months/M	I	pUPD (C)	ex 7, 1021C>T/Q341X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None/None	No. 28 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS5	1 year 3 months/M	II	pUPD (C)	ex 8, 1084C>T/R362Xc	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None/None	The present study
UWTS6	4 years 8 months/F	III	pUPD 11p15 (C)	Deletion of 3.9 Mb	Deletion spanning exons 3–7	None/None	No. 13 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS7	3 years 5 months/M	III	ROH/ROI (C)	Deletion of 3.3 Mb	Deletion spanning exons 4–10	None/None	No. 12 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS8	3 years 1 month/M	III	ROH/ROI (C)	Deletion of 1.3 Mb	Deletion spanning exons 1–10	None/None	No. 11 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS9	1 year 11 months/M	II	ROH/ROI (C)	Deletion of 13.1 Mbc	ex 2, 538_539insTC/K177fs299X	None/None	No. 21 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS10	1 year 3 months/F	II	Monosomy 11 (C)	Loss of chromosome 11	Promoter methylation	None/None	No. 3 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS11	1 year 11 months/M	III	ROH/ROI (C)	Deletion of 1.8 Mb	Deletion spanning exons 1–5	None/None	No. 7 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS12	2 years 5 months/M	III	ROH/ROI (C)	Deletion of 3.1 Mb	Deletion spanning exons 6–10	None/None	No. 9 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS13	2 years 3 months/M	I	ROH/ROI (C)	Deletion of 9.1 Mb	Deletion spanning exons 2–5	None/None	No. 8 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS14	5 years 7 months/F	II	ROH/ROI (C, P)	Deletion of 21.4 Mb	ex 7, 895G>T/D299Y	None/None	No. 24 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS15	2 years 7 months/M	I	ROH/ROI (C)	Deletion of 3.5 Mbc	ex 10, 1291_1297delins8/L401fsNo-stop	None/None	No. 23 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS16	1 year 9 months/M	IV	ROH/ROI (C, P)	Deletion of 4.5 Mb	Deletion spanning exons 2–5	None/None	No. 6 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS17	10 months/F	I	ROH/ROI (C, P)	Deletion of 18.5 Mb	ex 3, 588_590dell/P197fs229X	None/None	No. 15 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS18	1 year 7 months/M	II	ROH/ROI (C)	Deletion of 2.7 Mb	Deletion spanning exons 1–10	None/None	No. 5 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS19	2 years 4 months/M	III	ROH/ROI (C)	Deletion of 10.8 Mbc	ex 2, 483_484insCA/H162fs229X	None/None	No. 22 (Haruta et al, 2008)
UWTS20	1 year 6 months/F	II	pUPD 11p15 (C)	Deletion of 2.8 Mb	Deletion spanning exons 1–10	None/None	No. 4 (Haruta et al, 2008)

Abbreviations: C=methylation analysis of CTCF6 at H19-DMR by COBRA; COBRA=combined bisulfite restriction assay; ex=exon; F=female; P=allelic expression analysis on the polymorphic site at exon 9 of IGF2; LOI=loss of IGF2 imprinting; M=male; pUPD=paternal IGF2 UPD; ROH=retention of heterozygosity on 11p15; ROI=retention of IGF2 imprinting; UPD=uniparental disomy; WAGR=Wilms tumour–aniridia–genitourinary malformation-mental retardation syndrome.

See Table 3 for DNWT1-1=FWT2-1.

Above UPD indicates that the methylation status of H19-DMR was not examined.

Germline origin of the mutation was confirmed.

Somatic origin of the mutation was confirmed.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee at Saitama Cancer Center, and written informed consent was obtained from parents for samples from the Japan Wilms Tumor Study Group (JWiTS; Oue ). Since written informed consent was not obtained in a subset of patients collected before 2001, identifying information was removed prior to their analysis, in accordance with the Ethical Guidelines for Clinical Research enacted by the Japanese Government. The Ethics Committee approved the waiver of written informed consent for the latter samples.

Histological examination

The diagnosis of WT was made in all 45 tumours, with routine haematoxylin and eosin-stained pathology slides by pathologists at each institution or the JWiTS pathology panel according to the classification proposed by the Japanese Society of Pathology (The committee on histological classification of childhood tumors, 2008). In addition, a pathological review of 29 tissue specimens was performed by the JWiTS pathology panel.

Analysis of WT1 and allelic loss on 11p and 11q

Copy number and LOH analysis using single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) arrays, Affymetrix Mapping 50K-Xba and 250K-Nsp arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was conducted as described previously (Haruta ). Copy numbers and LOH were calculated using CNAG and AsCNAR programmes with paired or anonymous references as controls (Nannya ; Yamamoto ). Gross WT1 deletions were analysed by Southern blotting using a WT1 cDNA probe and BCL1 in chromosome band 11q13, or by SNP arrays or the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) method (Salsa MLPA kit, MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). To detect small WT1 mutations, defined as missense, nonsense, frame-shift or splice-site mutations, all coding exons including flanking intronic sequences of WT1 were amplified from genomic DNA by PCR, and PCR products were directly sequenced with the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

COBRA of the CTCF6 site at H19-DMR or MS-MLPA of the IC1 (H19-DMR) and IC2 (KvDMR) regions

We determined the methylation status of 11p15 region in tumour and PB samples by combined bisulfite restriction assay (COBRA; Watanabe ) and/or methylation specific (MS)-MLPA (Salsa MS-MLPA kit, ME030BWS/SRS) assay. Combined bisulfite restriction assay of CTCF6 at H19-differentially methylated region (H19-DMR) showed that the mean methylation percentage ±2 s.d. of five normal kidney and two PB samples was 53.6±5.6%, and we defined more than the mean percentage +2 s.d. as the hypermethylated state. Methylation specific-MLPA analysis was used to detect the methylation status of the IC1 (H19-DMR) and IC2 (KvDMR) regions. The methylation statuses were defined according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Statistical analysis

Differences in the incidence of clinical and genetic characteristics between any two genetic subtypes of tumours were examined by the χ2 or Fisher's exact test. P<0.05 (two-sided) was considered statistically significant. The Student's t-test or Mann–Whitney test was used to compare mean ages between patients with WT1-mutant bilateral WT and those with WT1-mutant sporadic and UWT, between patients with sporadic and UWT with a small WT1 mutation and those with sporadic and UWT with a large WT1 deletion, or between patients with paternal inheritance of a small WT1 mutation and those with maternal inheritance of a small WT1 mutation.

Results

Bilateral WT1-mutant WTs with or without pUPD on 11p

Of 45 bilateral tumours from 31 patients, 35 tumours from 25 (81%) patients had WT1 abnormalities; 30 tumours from 21 patients showed small mutations in 1 WT1 allele and the same small mutation in the other WT1 allele, caused by UPD on 11p (Table 1). One tumour (BWT3R) with deletion flanking exons 1–5 also had UPD on 11p, and was added to the above 30 tumours because of the small deletion. Combined bisulfite restriction assay and/or MS-MLPA identified hypermethylation of H19-DMR, which indicated the paternal origin of IGF2 UPD in all 31 tumours except 1 whose tumour DNA was not available (BWT21R). The remaining four tumours from three patients had large deletions encompassing WT1 in one WT1 allele and a frame-shift or splice-site mutation (three tumours; BWT2R, 9L and 22R) or a small deletion spanning exons 4–9 (one tumour; BWT2L) in the other WT1 allele. All four tumours had the retention of heterozygosity (ROH) on 11p, and had normally methylated CTCF6 at H19-DMR, indicating retention of IGF2 imprinting (ROI). The methylation status of CTCF6 at H19-DMR in PB was examined in 13 of the 25 patients. All 13 patients showed the normal methylation in PB, indicating somatic origin of UPD on 11p15.

WT1-mutant UWTs with or without pUPD on 11p

To compare WT1 and IGF2 statuses between 35 WT1-mutant bilateral WTs and 10 WT1-mutant syndromic or familial UWTs or 20 WT1-mutant sporadic and UWTs, we combined our published and unpublished data on WT1-mutant WTs and presented them in Table 2. One (BWT21R) of the 35 WTs and one (UWTG1) of the 10 WTs, in which 11p UPD was identified by SNP array but methylation status of H19-DMR was not examined, were included in each group of tumours with small WT1 mutation and pUPD of IGF2 because all 30 WT1-mutant bilateral WTs with 11p UPD examined in the present study showed the hypermethylation indicating paternal 11p UPD, and the previous study indicated loss of maternal 11p allele in WTs with 11p LOH (Schroeder ). Of the 10 patients, 5 (UWTG1-5) had small homozygous WT1 mutations and pUPD on 11p, whereas 5 (UWTG6-10) associated with WAGR syndrome had large deletions in 1 WT1 allele and small mutations in the other WT1 allele with IGF2 ROH/ROI in the tumours (Table 2). Of the 20 patients, 5 (UWTS1-5) had small homozygous WT1 mutations and pUPD on whole 11p in the tumours, whereas none of the remaining 15 (UWTS6-15) had the small WT1 mutations and pUPD on 11p; 12 had IGF2 ROI, 2 had pUPD limited to the 11p15 region and 1 had monosomy 11 of paternal origin in the tumours (Table 2). Thus, a homozygous WT1 mutation with pUPD on 11p was more frequent in 35 WT1-mutant bilateral WTs than in 10 WT1-mutant syndromic or familial UWTs (P=0.017) or 20 WT1-mutant sporadic and UWTs (P=3.0E−06).

When we analysed the 3 groups of patients with WT1-mutant WTs, the mean age of 25 patients with bilateral WT was 12.4 months, that of 10 patients with syndromic or familial and UWT was 14.3 months and that of 20 patients with sporadic UWT was 25.6 months. The 25 and 10 patients were younger than the 20 patients, respectively (P=0.001 and P=0.006), whereas no difference in age was found between the 25 and 10 patients (P=0.286). When we selected the 20 patients with sporadic and UWTs, the mean age of 5 patients with homozygous WT1 mutations and paternal 11p UPD was 13.2 months and that of 15 patients with large deletions encompassing WT1 with or without pUPD limited to the 11p15 region in the tumours was 29.7 months. The 5 patients with homozygous WT1 mutations and pUPD on 11p were younger than the 15 patients with large 11p13 deletions (P=0.002).

WT1-wild-type bilateral WTs and the IGF2 status

Ten bilateral tumours from six patients had wild-type WT1; six tumours had +12, and 2 had 1q+, +6, +8. or pUPD of whole chromosome 11 and one had pUPD of 11p (Table 1). None of the six patients showed characteristics of BWS. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms analysis and COBRA of CTCF6 at H19-DMR and/or MS-MLPA revealed pUPD on 11p or whole chromosome 11 in three tumours, ROI of IGF2 in four and LOI of IGF2 in three (Table 1). Of three tumours with pUPD on 11p or whole chromosome 11, the corresponding PB showed normal methylation at H19-DMR in one (BWT30L) and was not available in two; in one of the two, the contralateral tumour had ROH/ROI (BWT31R), denying the constitutional 11p15 UPD (BWT31L). Of three tumours with LOI of IGF2, the corresponding PB showed normal methylation at H19-DMR in one (BWT29) and was not available in two bilateral WTs (BWT28L, 28R) from one patient, not denying the possibility of constitutional hypermethylation of maternal H19-DMR (Table 1).

Of 27 tumours, whose methylation status at IC2 was examined by MS-MLPA, 26 and 1 showed hypomethylation and normal methylation, respectively; the results were consistent with pUPD and LOI of 11p15, respectively.

Histology of bilateral and FWTs

Of 29 WT1-mutant bilateral WTs, which were available for pathological review, 25 and 4 tissue specimens were obtained before and after chemotherapy, respectively. Of the 25 tumours, 12 were classified as the mesenchymal type; 4 and 2 of the 12 also had intra-lobar nephrogenic rests (ILNR) and foetal rhabdomyomatous nephroblastoma, respectively, 11 were classified as the mixed type; 1 also had ILNR, 1 was classified as nephroblastoma with ILNR and 1 was classified as ILNR only. Of 4 specimens obtained after chemotherapy, 3 were classified as the mesenchymal type; one also had ILNR, and one as nephroblastoma with ILNR.

Of seven WT1-wild-type bilateral WTs from six patients, which were available for pathological review, five and two specimens were obtained before and after chemotherapy, respectively. Of the five tumours, two (BWT28, and 29) were classified as the epithelial type, two (BWT26 and 30) as the mixed type and one (BWT27) as the mesenchymal type. While the mesenchymal and mixed types were found in both WT1-mutant and WT1-wild-type bilateral WTs, the epithelial type was only found in WT1-wild-type bilateral WTs. Two specimens obtained after chemotherapy showed either the mixed or mesenchymal type. None of the tumour specimens from 31 patients exhibited features of focal or diffuse anaplasia.

The penetrance rates of WTs with inherited or DNWT1 abnormalities, classified according to parental inheritance and WT1 abnormality types

We summarised 22 children from 14 families who inherited WT1 mutation/deletion from their mothers or fathers, and 8 children who had de novo large deletion encompassing WT1 of known parental germ cell origin from the present study and literatures listed in PubMed. The 22 individuals included 3 patients with WTs (FWT4-1, 4-3 and FWT12-1; Figure 1, Table 3); although molecular analyses have not been done in their PB and tumour samples, the pedigrees showed that the 3 patients who developed WT were thought to inherit WT1 mutations/deletions from their father or mother.

Figure 1

Pedigrees of patients with WTs with small DNWT1-8 indicates eight families having the de novo deletion of paternal or maternal germ cell origin. Open boxes and circles containing a small circle indicate males and females, respectively, with germinal WT1 mutations who did not develop WT. Filled boxes and circles indicate males and females, respectively, who developed WT. WT6-2 was excluded from the penetrance analysis because of the reason described in the text (Fencl ). Open boxes and circles with an upright triangle indicate males and females, respectively, with a balanced chromosomal insertion involving the 11p13 band. Open boxes with an inverted triangle indicate males with the deletion who did not develop WT. Oblongs and ovals indicate paternal and maternal germ cells, respectively. Filled and open diamonds indicate males and females, who developed and did not develop WT, respectively. Abbreviations: AN=aniridia; CNS=congenital nephrotic syndrome; FGS=focal glomerular sclerosis; GU=genitourinary malformation; MR=mental retardation; NE=not examined; renal F=renal failure; SM=small mutation; SHM=small homozygous mutation; wt=wild type.

Table 3

Genetic and epigenetic alterations in IGF2 (11p15) and WT1 (11p13) loci in 34 patients with Wilms tumours of familial or de novo WT1 mutations

Tumour	Age/sex	IGF2	WT1 allele 1	WT1 allele 2	Malformations/laterality	Heredity	References
Children inherited small WT1 mutations from their fathers (n=9)
FWT1	7 months/F	pUPD (C, M)	ex 9, 1168C>T/R390X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	OD, FGS/BWT	Father had a WT1 mutation and a history of WT	Present study (BWT23)
FWT2-1	1 year 4 months/M	pUPD (C)	ex 9, 1168C>T/R390X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	GU/UWT	Father had a WT1 mutation and no history of WT	Present study (UWTG2)
FWT2-2	1 year 7 months/F	pUPD (C)	ex 9, 1168C>T/R390X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None/BWT	Father had a WT1 mutation and no history of WT	Present study (BWT25)
FWT3	3 years/M	NE	ex 6, 847delG/H291fs306X	LOH at WT1 sequences	None/UWT	Father had a WT1 mutation and a history of WT	Pelletier et al, 1991
FWT4-1	<12 months/F	NE	NE	NE	None/UWT	Father had a WT1 mutation and no history of WT	Kaplinsky et al, 1996
FWT4-2	4 months/F	NE	ex 8, 1084C>G/R302X	LOH at WT1 sequences	None/BWT	Father had a WT1 mutation and no history of WT	Kaplinsky et al, 1996
FWT4-3	6 months/F	NE	NE	NE	None/WT	Father had a WT1 mutation and no history of WT	Kaplinsky et al, 1996
FWT5	1 year 4 months/F	NE	ex 3, S223N	NE	None/UWT	Father had a WT1 mutation and no history of WT	Jeanpierre et al, 1998
FWT6-1	1 year 1 month/F	NE	ex 8, R366P	NE	CNS/UWT	Father had a WT1 mutation and no history of WT	Fencl et al, 2012
FWT6-2a	5 months	NR	ex 8, R366P	NR	CNS	Father had a WT1 mutation and no history of WT	Fencl et al, 2012
Children inherited small WT1 mutations from their mothers (n=6)
FWT7-1	2 years/F	NE	ex 7, del7bp/H319fs377X	ex 7, 26 bp deletion	None/UWT	Mother had a WT1 mutation and no history of WT	Pritchard-Jones et al, 2000
FWT7-2	4 years/M	NE	ex 7, del7bp/H319fs377X	del(11)(p13p13)	None/UWT	Mother had a WT1 mutation and no history of WT	Pritchard-Jones et al, 2000
FWT8-1	9 years/F	NE	ex 10, 1730A>G/X450W	NE	Renal failure/UWT	Mother had a WT1 mutation and no history of WT	Zirn et al, 2005
FWT8-2	17 years/M	NR	ex 10, 1730 A>G/X450W	NR	None	Mother had a WT1 mutation and no history of WT	Zirn et al, 2005
FWT9	6 years/M	NR	ex 1, 328C>A/Y109X	NR	GU	Mother had a WT1 mutation and a history of WT	Regev et al, 2008
FWT10	1 year 11 months/M	NE	ex 7, 983delC/P328fs380X	Wild type	GU/UWT	Mother had a WT1 mutation and a history of WT	Melchionda et al, 2013
Children inherited large WT1 deletions from their fathers or mothers (n=7)
F11-1	2 years/F	NE	del(11)(p13p13)	NE	AN, GU, MR/UWT	Father had ins(14;11)(q23;p12p14)	Lavedan et al, 1989
F11-2	4 years/M	NR	del(11)(p13p13)	NR	AN, GU	Father had ins(14;11)(q23;p12p14)	Lavedan et al, 1989
FWT12-1	1 year 11 months/M	NE	NE	NE	AN/WT	Mother had ins(2;11)(q23;p12p14)	Yunis and Ramsay, 1980
FWT12-2	1 year 3 months/M	NE	del(11)(p13p14)	NE	AN, GU/BWT	Mother had ins(2;11)(q23;p12p14)	Yunis and Ramsay, 1980
FWT13-1	17 years/M	NR	del(11)(p12p14)	NR	MR	Mother had ins(16;11)(p13;p12p14)	Kousseff and Agatucci, 1981
FWT13-2	6 months/M	NE	del(11)(p12p14)	NE	GU/UWT	Mother had ins(16;11)(p13;p12p14)	Kousseff and Agatucci, 1981
FWT14	NI	NE	del(11)(p12p14)	NE	AN, GU/UWT	Mother had ins(12;11)(p12;p12p14.2)	Nakagome et al, 1984
Children with de novo large WT1 deletions of paternal or maternal germ cell origin, included in the penetrance analysis (n=8)
DNWT1	NI	NR	del(11)(p13p14.1)	NR	AN, GU	de novo deletion of paternal germ cell origin	Huff et al, 1990
DNWT2	NI	NE	del(11)(p13p13)	NE	AN/WT	de novo deletion of paternal germ cell origin	Huff et al, 1990
DNWT3	NI	NE	del(11)(p11.2p14.1)	NE	AN/WT	de novo deletion of maternal germ cell origin	Huff et al, 1990
DNWT4	NI	NE	del(11)(p13.4p14.3)	NE	AN/WT	de novo deletion of paternal germ cell origin	Huff et al, 1990
DNWT5	NI	NE	del(11)(p12p15.1)	NE	AN/WT	de novo deletion of paternal germ cell origin	Huff et al, 1990
SNWT6	NI	NE	del(11)(p12p15)	NE	AN, GU/WT	de novo deletion of paternal germ cell origin	Huff et al, 1990
DNWT7	NI	NR	del(11)(p12p15.1)	NR	AN	de novo deletion of paternal germ cell origin	Huff et al, 1990
DNWT8	NI	NR	del(11)(p13p14.1)	NR	AN, GU	de novo deletion of paternal germ cell origin	Huff et al, 1990
Patients with de novo small WT1 mutation of paternal germ cell origin, not included in the penetrance analysis (n=4)
DNWT9-1	1 year 6 months/F	UPDb	ex 1, 144C>A/Y48X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None//UWT	de novo mutation of paternal germ cell origin	Present study (UWTG1)
DNWT9-2	1 year 8 months/F	pUPD (C, M)	ex 1, 144C>A/Y48X	The same as allele 1, UPD11pt-11cen	None//BWT	de novo mutation of paternal germ cell origin	No. 36 (Haruta et al, 2008)/BWT24
DNWT10	NI	LOH on 11p15	ex 8, H377R	LOH on 11p13	Drash syndrome/UWT	de novo mutation of paternal germ cell origin	Nordenskjold et al, 1994
DNWT11	NI	LOH on 11p15	ex 9, D396N	LOH on 11p13	Drash syndrome/UWT	de novo mutation of paternal germ cell origin	Nordenskjold et al, 1994

Abbreviations: AN=aniridia; BWT=bilateral WT; C=methylation analysis of CTCF6 by COBRA; CNS=congenital nephrotic syndrome; COBRA=combined bisulfite restriction assay; ex=exon; F=female; FGS=focal glomerular sclerosis; FWT=familial WT; GU=genitourinary malformation; LOH=loss of heterogeneity; M=male; M=methylation analysis of H19-DMR by MS-MLPA; MR=mental retardation; NI=not informative; NR=not relevant; NE=not examined; OD=ovarial dysgenesis; pUPD=paternal UPD; UPD=uniparental disomy; UWT=unilateral WT; WT=Wilms tumour.

FWT6-2 was excluded from the penetrance analysis because of the reason described in the text.

Above UPD indicates that the methylation status of H19-DMR was not examined.

Identical twins (DNWT9-1, 2) in this study shared the same nonsense mutation in PB and tumour samples (Table 3). Because their parents had no WT1 mutation in PB, SNP array analysis was performed on 10 polymorphic markers around WT1 to identify the parental origin of the DNWT1 mutation using PB from the parents and twins as well as tumour samples. Because the maternally derived loci identified by SNP markers (SNP A 1946935, 2241668, 4231943 and seven others) were lost in the tumour with UPD on 11p, the paternal germ cell origin of the mutation was determined (Table 3). In addition, two patients (DNWT10, 11) were reported to have small homozygous WT1 mutations of paternal germ cell origin in tumours (Nordenskjold ). These four patients with small DNWT1 mutations of paternal germ cell origin (DNWT9-1, 9-2, 10 and 11) were excluded from the penetrance analysis, because unaffected carriers with small DNWT1 mutations could not be evaluated. In contrast, eight children with large de novo 11p13 deletions (DNWT1-8) were included in the analysis as carriers without development of WT could be evaluated (Figure 1; Huff ).

All nine patients who inherited a small WT1 mutation from their fathers developed WT; a girl (FWT6-2) was excluded from the penetrance analysis because she died of renal failure at the age of 23 weeks before the possible development of WT (Pelletier ; Kaplinsky ; Jeanpierre ; Shibata ; Fencl ). Of nine WTs with the paternal inheritance of WT1 mutation, four tumours [FWT1 (BWT23L, 23R), 2-1, 2-2] in this study showed homozygous WT1 mutations and pUPD on 11p, and two (FWT3, 4-2) showed homozygous WT1 mutations, suggesting that the six tumours may have had the same WT1 and IGF2 abnormalities (Figure 1 and Table 3).

Of 6 individuals who inherited small WT1 mutations from their mothers, 4 developed WT; in addition to the small germline mutation in 1 allele 1 had a 26 base-pair deletion that differed from the first mutation (FWT7-1), 1 had a large 11p13 deletion (FWT7-2), 1 had a wild-type WT1 (FWT10) in the other allele in their tumours and the WT1 status in the tumour was not examined in the last patient (FWT8-1; Pritchard-Jones ; Zirn ; Regev ; Melchionda ). Thus, all three patients who inherited the WT1 mutation from their mothers and whose WT1 status in tumours were examined were not likely to have UPD on 11p in their tumours (Figure 1 and Table 3). The mean ages at diagnosis were 14.2 months for the nine patients with the paternal inheritance and 55.3 months for the four patients with the maternal inheritance; the mean age of the nine patients who inherited the mutations from their fathers was younger than that of the four patients who inherited the mutations from their mothers (P=0.011 by Mann–Whitney test).

Fifteen individuals from 12 families were shown to have inherited (FWT11-14) or de novo large 11p13 deletions (DNWT1-8) of paternal or maternal origin (Figure 1 and Table 3; Yunis and Ramsay, 1980; Kousseff and Agatucci, 1981; Nakagome ; Lavedan ; Huff ; Nordenskjold ). All four parents who transmitted large 11p13 deletions had balanced chromosomal insertions involving the 11p13 band. Ten patients developed WTs, on which sequencing analysis of WT1 was not conducted to identify the status of the other WT1 allele in the tumours. Thus, the penetrance rate was 100% (9/9) for individuals who inherited small WT1 mutations from their fathers, and was 67% (14/21) for individuals who inherited small WT1 mutations from their mothers or large 11p13 deletions or had de novo large 11p13 deletions irrespective of the parental origin. Thus, the 9 individuals were more likely to develop WT than the 21 individuals (P=0.057).

Discussion

The incidence of WT1 abnormalities in the bilateral WTs of Japanese children was 81%, and this incidence was markedly higher than those reported in American, UK and Australian children (the mean percentage of three series, 32% P=9.4E−05; Table 4; Huff, 1998; Scott ; Hu ). The present series included 31 patients and 45 bilateral WTs, and the UK series included 11 patients and 11 bilateral WTs; the statuses of WT1 and 11p15 were precisely examined in 44 of the 45 and all 11 tumours (Table 4; Scott ). The incidence of WT1 abnormality is more frequent in Japanese tumours than in British tumours; however, if we consider that the incidence of WT among Japanese is half of that in Caucasians, the population-based rate of bilateral WT with WT1 abnormality may be similar between the two populations (Figure 2). Diller found constitutional WT1 abnormalities in 8 of 157 (5%) American children with a history of WT. Likewise, Little found constitutional WT1 abnormalities in 6 (2%) of 282 British children with non-syndromic WT. Unfortunately, no studies on constitutional WT1 abnormalities have been performed in Japanese children with WT that precluded the comparison of the incidence of constitutional WT1 abnormalities between the two ethnic populations. In contrast to the equivocal findings in the incidence of WT1 abnormality, that of IGF2 LOI was clearly higher in British children with WT1-wild-type or WT1-wild-type plus WT1-mutant bilateral WT than Japanese counterparts (Table 4 and Figure 2; Scott ). Thus, it is clear that the incidence of IGF2 LOI in Caucasian bilateral WTs is higher than that in Japanese counterparts, and that the incidence of WT1 wild-type was low in Japanese bilateral WTs.

Table 4

Incidence rates of WT1 and IGF2 abnormalities in Japanese and British, American or Australian series of bilateral Wilms tumour

	WT1 abn+wt	pUPD	ROI	LOI	WT1 abn	pUPD	ROI	LOI	WT1 wt	pUPD	ROI	LOI
A. Japan (the present study)	45a (31)	34a	8	3	35a (25)	31a	4	0	10 (6)	3	4	3
B. UK (Scott et al, 2012)	11	5	0	6	4	4	0	0	7	1	0	6
Constitutional defect-associated	5	5	0	0	4	4	0	0	1	1	0	0
Sporadic	6	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	6	0	0	6
C. USA (Huff, 1998)	15	NE	NE	NE	4	NE	NE	NE	11	NE	NE	NE
D. Australia (Hu et al, 2013)	8	NE	NE	NE	3	NE	NE	NE	5	NE	NE	NE

Abbreviations: abn=abnormality; LOI=loss of IGF2 imprinting; NE=not examined; pUPD=paternal uniparental disomy; ROI=retention of IGF2 imprinting; SNP=single-nucleotide polymorphisms; wt=wild type.

Numbers indicate numbers of tumours, and those in parentheses indicate numbers of patients in the Japanese series. Numbers in other series indicate both patient and tumour numbers. WT1 abnormality and WT1 wild type (patients): A versus B P=0.011; A versus B+C+D P=9.4E−05. WT1 abnormality and WT1 wild type (tumours): A versus B P=0.012; A versus B+C+D P=5.1E−05. LOI and UPD+ROI (tumours with WT1 abnormality and those with WT1 wild type): A versus B P=0.001. LOI and UPD+ROI (tumours with WT1 wild type): A versus B P=0.036.

Include one tumour (BWT21R) in which UPD was detected by SNP array analysis but methylation status at H19-DMR was not examined.

Figure 2

Abnormalities of the The bar length for Japanese is half of that for Caucasians because the incidence rate for Japanese is half of that for Caucasians.

The incidence rates of WT are known to vary, being markedly lower in East Asian children than in their Caucasian counterparts (Parkin ). We previously reported that if only sporadic WTs were included, the frequencies of WT with WT1 abnormality were similar between East-Asian and Caucasian populations (Haruta ). Furthermore, we reported a lower incidence of WT with IGF2 LOI in Japanese children than in American children (P=0.041), and we and others proposed that the lower incidence of IGF2 LOI may be one of the reasons for the lower incidence of WT in Japan (Fukuzawa ; Haruta ). Contrary to the equivocal findings in the incidences of WT1 abnormality in sporadic or bilateral WTs between the two populations, the difference in the incidence of IGF2 LOI in bilateral WTs is clear (P=0.036); the relationship is comparative to that of IGF2 LOI in sporadic WTs between the two populations. Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome is an imprinting-related growth disorder. Five to 10% of patients with BWS have methylation of H19-DMR on both parental chromosomes, resulting in IGF2 LOI (Cerrato ). Interestingly, Japanese patients with BWS were shown to have a significantly lower frequency of H19-DMR hypermethylation than North American and European patients, whereas the incidences of pUPD on 11p15 were comparable, suggesting that susceptibility to epigenetic alterations differs between the two populations (Sasaki ). The constitutional 11p15 abnormalities in patients with WT were reported from UK and Netherlands. The UK series included 437 patients with non-syndromic WT and found 11p15 abnormalities in 13 (3%) patients; of the 13 patients 4 had bilateral WT and 6 had hypermethylation of H19-DMR (Scott ). The Netherlands series included 109 patients with syndromic or non-syndromic WTs and found 8 (7.3%) children with 11p15 abnormalities; of the 8 patients 3 had bilateral WT, 4 had BWS and 3 had hypermethylation of H19-DMR (Segers ). Of 13 patients whose methylation status of H19-DMR in PB was examined in the present series, all including 1 (BWT29) with IGF2 LOI in the tumour showed the normal methylation pattern. Thus, the involvement of the constitutional IGF2 LOI in Japanese bilateral WTs could not be identified. The same decreased susceptibility to the epigenetic change reported in BWS may have also caused the decreased incidence of bilateral WTs with IGF2 LOI (Sasaki ). The study for constitutional 11p15 abnormalities in Japanese WTs is needed to prove the hypothesis.

The present study included six patients having bilateral WTs with wild-type WT1, and one of them had PCS syndrome, which was caused by a BUB1B mutation and known to be associated with a predisposition to WT (Matsuura ). The FWT genes, FWT1 and FWT2, were located at 17q21 and 19q13, respectively, and the lack of a linkage to these loci in some WT families was reported previously and indicated the existence of additional FWT genes (Ruteshouser and Huff, 2004). Very recently, Hanks identified germline mutation of the CTR9 gene in 3 of 35 WT families using an exome and sequencing analysis and proposed it as a new WT predisposing gene . These genes may be candidates for germline mutations in the other five patients with WT1-wild-type bilateral WTs in the present series.

A previous study showed that the WT1 mutations observed in bilateral WT were of germline origin (Huff, 1998). Another study reviewed WT1 germline mutations in 117 patients with WTs (Royer-Pokora ). Of the 117 patients, 44 had bilateral WT, indicating that a large proportion of germline WT1 mutations are associated with bilateral WT, although the inheritance is not known in all patients. The present study included 25 patients with WT1-mutant bilateral WTs, and the status of WT1 in PB was only examined in 3 patients and 6 parents from 3 families; 2 were shown to have inherited the mutation from their father with or without a past history of WT and 1 was identified to have a DNWT1 mutation of paternal germ cell origin. Thus, mutation analyses of WT1 in the PB of patients and their parents are needed to determine whether the mutation is inherited from the parents or occurred de novo.

A previous study examined the parental origin of de novo RB1 mutations, and found the paternal origin of the mutation in all patients (Dryja ). Regarding DNWT1 alterations, we and other researchers found the paternal germ cell origin of the small mutation in four patients and that of the large deletion in seven patients and the maternal germ cell origin of the large deletion in one patient (Huff ; Nordenskjold ). No studies have reported the maternal germ cell origin of de novo small WT1 mutations. In a review on human germinal mutations, Crow (2000) described that one marked difference between the human male and female was that there are many more germline cell divisions in the life history of a sperm than that of an egg. In WTs with homozygous WT1 mutations and paternal IGF2 UPD, the IGF2 alteration is thought to be the second genetic event subsequent to the WT1 alteration that has been shown to occur in the paternal WT1 allele. The result that pUPD on 11p was found in the great majority of bilateral WTs in the present study further supports the paternal germ cell origin of de novo small WT1 mutations.

We summarised the data of all 30 children from 22 families with hereditary WT, whose inheritance of the WT1 alteration was described in the present and previous studies (Table 3; Yunis and Ramsay, 1980; Kousseff and Agatucci, 1981; Nakagome ; Lavedan ; Pelletier ; Kaplinsky ; Jeanpierre ; Pritchard-Jones ; Shibata ; Zirn ; Regev ; Fencl ; Melchionda ). We classified 30 children into 3 groups based on parental inheritance of the germline mutation and types of WT1 abnormality, and found that children who inherited small WT1 mutations from their father were more likely to have the higher penetrance rate than those who inherited small WT1 mutations from their mothers or inherited the large deletions or had the de novo large deletions irrespective of parental origin (P=0.057; Figure 1). Why do parental inheritance and WT1 abnormality types affect the penetrance rate? Most parents had DNWT1 mutations of paternal germ cell origin, as shown in (Figure 3A). Children who had a small WT1 mutation of paternal germ cell origin easily developed WT because pUPD on 11p resulted in homozygous WT1 mutations and simultaneous overexpression of IGF2 (Figure 3B and C). Children less frequently developed WT by the second mutation in the maternally derived WT1 allele because this tumorigenic pathway needs additional genetic and/or epigenetic events (Figure 3D). In contrast, WTs developed in children who inherited the small mutation from their mothers could not take advantage of simultaneous alterations in WT1 and IGF2 because maternally derived IGF2 is imprinted and repressed (Figure 3E and F). Children who inherited the small mutations from their mothers could develop WT if an independent WT1 mutation occurred in the paternally derived WT1 allele, which resides on the same 11p expressing IGF2; expression even from one IGF2 allele may be important for the development of embryonic tumours (Figure 3G).

Figure 3

Parental inheritance of small Black and white circles in terminal 11p represent methylated and unmethylated statuses, respectively, at CTCF6 in the IGF2-H19 region. Blue arrows indicate the expression of IGF2. × and star in the 11p13 region indicate the first and second WT1 mutations, respectively. Solid and broken arrows in the 11p13 region indicate normal and abnormal WT1 expression, respectively. Parents had balanced insertions involving the 11p13 band (H). A gap in the 11p chromatid (I and L) indicates a large deletion encompassing WT1, and × in the 11p13 region indicates the second WT1 mutations (K and N). Explanation for panels A–G, J, and M is described in the discussion.

Regarding the large 11p13 deletion, children who inherited the large deletions or had the de novo large deletions could develop WT if an independent WT1 mutation occurred in the paternally or maternally derived WT1 allele (Figure 3K and N). However, large homozygous deletions in the 11p13 chromosomal region caused by UPD on 11p were unlikely to occur in a nephroblast, because of disadvantage for survival with the loss of a large number of genes (Figure 3J and M). In fact, seven tumours developed in patients with WAGR syndrome, in which both WT1 and IGF2 statuses were examined, showed large 11p13 deletions in one WT1 allele and small mutations in the other allele and ROH on 11pter-11p13 (BWT2L, BWT2R and UWTG6-10; Tables 1 and 2). Furthermore, the patients inherited the small mutations from their fathers were younger than those who inherited the small mutations from their mothers, and the patients with a sporadic and UWT with small homozygous WT1 mutations and pUPD of IGF2 were younger than those with a sporadic and UWT with the large deletion. These findings indicate that a small WT1 mutation with pUPD on 11p is the most efficient mechanism for WT development.

The present result on the WT1 and IGF2 statuses in bilateral and FWT led to the hypothesis that individuals who inherited small WT1 mutations from their fathers may be more likely to develop WT than those who inherited the small mutations from their mothers or inherited large 11p13 deletions or had the de novo large deletions irrespective of parental origin. It is obvious that genetic and epigenetic studies in a large number of WT families with WT1 mutations are needed to confirm the hypothesis. We believe that if confirmed the present findings are useful for the genetic counselling of individuals, including WT survivors, who may inherit WT1 mutations.