| Literature DB >> 25688304 |
Abbas Rakhshani1, Raghuram Nagarathna1, Rita Mhaskar2, Arun Mhaskar2, Annamma Thomas2, Sulochana Gunasheela3.
Abstract
Introduction. Impaired placentation and inadequate trophoblast invasion have been associated with the etiology of many pregnancy complications and have been correlated with the first trimester uterine artery resistance. Previous studies have shown the benefits of yoga in improving pregnancy outcomes and those of yogic visualization in revitalizing the human tissues. Methods. 59 high-risk pregnant women were randomized into yoga (n = 27) and control (n = 32) groups. The yoga group received standard care plus yoga sessions (1 hour/day, 3 times/week), from 12th to 28th week of gestation. The control group received standard care plus conventional antenatal exercises (walking). Measurements were assessed at 12th, 20th, and 28th weeks of gestation. Results. RM-ANOVA showed significantly higher values in the yoga group (28th week) for biparietal diameter (P = 0.001), head circumference (P = 0.002), femur length (P = 0.005), and estimated fetal weight (P = 0.019). The resistance index in the right uterine artery (P = 0.01), umbilical artery (P = 0.011), and fetal middle cerebral artery (P = 0.048) showed significantly lower impedance in the yoga group. Conclusion. The results of this first randomized study of yoga in high-risk pregnancy suggest that guided yogic practices and visualization can improve the intrauterine fetal growth and the utero-fetal-placental circulation.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25688304 PMCID: PMC4320907 DOI: 10.1155/2015/373041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Prev Med
Yoga interventions.
| Practices1 | Duration |
|---|---|
| Guided relaxation with visualization and imagery | 5 min. |
| Hasta āyama śvasanam (hands in and out breathing) | 1 min. |
| Hastavistāra śvasanam (hands stretch breathing) | 2 min. |
| Gulphavistāra śvasanam (ankles stretch breathing with wall support) | 1 min. |
| Ka | 1 min. |
| Guided relaxation with visualization and imagery | 5 min. |
| Uttānapādāsana śvasanam (leg raise breathing) | 1 min. |
| Setubandhāsana śvasanam (hip raise breathing) | 1 min. |
| Pādasañcālanam (cycling in supine pose) | 1 min. |
| Supta udarākar | 1 min. |
| Vyāghrāsana śvasanam (tiger stretch breathing) | 1 min. |
| Guided relaxation with visualization and imagery | 5 min. |
| Gulphagūraṇam (ankle rotation) | 2 min. |
| Jānuphalakākar | 1 min. |
| Ardhātitaliāsana (half butterfly exercise) | 3 min. |
| Poornātitaliāsana (full butterfly exercise) | 1 min. |
| Guided relaxation with visualization and imagery | 5 min. |
| Jyotitrā | 2 min. |
| Nā | 2 min. |
| Deep relaxation in matsyakrī | 10 min. |
1Except for the visualization and guided imagery, all the practices are part of the book [14].
Figure 1Consort diagram for trial profile.
Demographic data and maternal characteristics at baseline.
| Groups |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yoga ( | Control ( | ||
| Subjects educational profile1 | |||
| 8th grade | 1 | 2 | |
| 10th grade | 7 | 5 | |
| 12th grade | 0 | 4 |
|
| Junior college | 0 | 3 | |
| Bachelor degree | 11 | 11 | |
| Master degree | 5 | 4 | |
| Living arrangement | |||
| Independent2 | 13 | 13 | |
| With parents | 8 | 13 |
|
| With relatives or friends | 3 | 3 | |
| Religion | |||
| Hindu | 20 | 22 | |
| Moslem | 0 | 2 |
|
| Christian | 4 | 5 | |
| Age | |||
| Mean (SD) | 27.2 (4.8) | 27.5 (5.5) |
|
| 95% CI | 25.1–29.2 | 25.4–29.5 | |
| Household monthly income3 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 35.4 (28.9) | 36.9 (36.4) |
|
| 95% CI | 22.9–47.8 | 22.8–51.0 | |
| Socioeconomic4 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 35.4 (7.8) | 36.5 (9.4) |
|
| 95% CI | 32.1–38.7 | 32.9–40.0 | |
| Maternal weight (kg) | |||
| Mean (SD) | 61.8 (13.0) | 62.7 (14.6) |
|
| 95% CI | 56.4–67.3 | 57.1–68.3 | |
| Maternal height (m) | |||
| Mean (SD) | 1.57 (0.05) | 1.58 (0.06) |
|
| 95% CI | 1.55–1.59 | 1.55–1.59 | |
| Maternal BMI | |||
| Mean (SD) | 25.1 (4.8) | 25.4 (4.9) |
|
| 95% CI | 23.1–27.1 | 23.5–27.2 | |
| Maternal systolic BP | |||
| Mean (SD) | 108.3 (12.9) | 104.1 (8.3) |
|
| 95% CI | 102.7–113.9 | 100.9–107.3 | |
| Maternal diastolic BP | |||
| Mean (SD) | 67.5 (9.5) | 64.2 (7.6) |
|
| 95% CI | 63.4–71.6 | 61.3–67.1 | |
1 No subject had education below 8th standard.
2Independent: lived with her husband and children, if any.
3Family's monthly income in thousands of Indian rupees as reported by the subject.
4Socioeconomic status: measured by a standard questionnaire.
a Calculated using Chi-Square test.
b Calculated using Independent Samples t-square test.
c There were three subjects in each group that did not complete the demographic questionnaire, which resulted in missing data, hence the lower n values.
Remarks: no statistically significant difference was observed between the mean values of socioeconomic parameters of the two groups.
Ultrasound fetal measurements between groups.
| Parameters | Gestational age | Mean ± SD |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoga ( | Control ( | |||
| Biparietal diameter (BPD) | 12th wk | 20.2 ± 4.0 | 19.5 ± 2.4 |
|
| 20th wk | 50.6 ± 5.4 | 46.9 ± 2.4 | ||
| 28th wk | 72.5 ± 2.9 | 70.4 ± 2.3 | ||
|
| ||||
| Head circumference (HD) | 12th wk | 75.4 ± 9.4 | 74.3 ± 8.6 |
|
| 20th wk | 181.0 ± 7.9 | 173.7 ± 7.9 | ||
| 28th wk | 268.6 ± 8.7 | 262.4 ± 8.2 | ||
|
| ||||
| Abdominal circumference (AC) | 12th wk | 62.3 ± 8.5 | 60.7 ± 6.2 |
|
| 20th wk | 150.0 ± 10.6 | 149.1 ± 8.9 | ||
| 28th wk | 243.7 ± 13.9 | 236.4 ± 11.1 | ||
|
| ||||
| Femur length (FL) | 12th wk | 9.2 ± 1.9 | 9.3 ± 1.7 |
|
| 20th wk | 33.1 ± 2.1 | 31.5 ± 1.9 | ||
| 28th wk | 55.0 ± 2.6 | 53.0 ± 2.3 | ||
|
| ||||
| Heart rate (HR) | 12th wk | 163.5 ± 9.4 | 157.8 ± 9.4 |
|
| 20th wk | 149.3 ± 7.6 | 143.0 ± 9.9 | ||
| 28th wk | 145.0 ± 11.6 | 141.3 ± 7.2 | ||
|
| ||||
| Estimated fetal weight (EFW) | 12th wk | 0.065 ± 0.02 | 0.066 ± 0.01 |
|
| 20th wk | 0.362 ± 0.05 | 0.329 ± 0.04 | ||
| 28th wk | 1.275 ± 0.15 | 1.188 ± 0.13 | ||
1Calculated using RM-ANOVA.
aANCOVA keeping the baseline data as covariate.
Remarks: significant improvement was observed in all fetal parameters except for AC, which was near significance.
Measures of uteroplacental circulation between groups.
| Arteries | Gestational age | Mean ± SD or count (%) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoga ( | Control ( | ||||
| Right uterine artery | Systolic/diastolic ratio | 12th wk | 3.2 ± 1.4 | 3.1 ± 1.1 |
|
| 20th wk | 2.3 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 1.1 | |||
| 28th wk | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 2.4 ± 0.7 | |||
| Pulsatility index | 12th wk | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 1.4 ± 0.5 |
| |
| 20th wk | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.5 | |||
| 28th wk | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | |||
| Resistance index | 12th wk | 0.65 ± 0.1 | 0.64 ± 0.1 |
| |
| 20th wk | 0.52 ± 0.1 | 0.58 ± 0.1 | |||
| 28th wk | 0.46 ± 0.1 | 0.55 ± 0.1 | |||
| Diastolic notch | 12th wk | 7 (22.6%) | 7 (18.4%) |
| |
| 20th wk | 2 (6.1%) | 3 (7.9%) |
| ||
| 28th wk | 1 (3.6%) | 1 (2.9%) |
| ||
|
| |||||
| Left uterine artery | Systolic/diastolic ratio | 12th wk | 3.5 ± 1.5 | 3.6 ± 1.6 |
|
| 20th wk | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 2.6 ± 1.1 | |||
| 28th wk | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 1.2 | |||
| Pulsatility index | 12th wk | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 1.5 ± 0.8 |
| |
| 20th wk | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.5 | |||
| 28th wk | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 1.8 | |||
| Resistance index | 12th wk | 0.69 ± 0.15 | 0.66 ± 0.12 |
| |
| 20th wk | 0.52 ± 0.06 | 0.57 ± 0.11 | |||
| 28th wk | 0.47 ± 0.07 | 0.59 ± 0.24 | |||
| Diastolic notch | 12th wk | 10 (32.3%) | 8 (21.1%) |
| |
| 20th wk | 1 (3.0%) | 6 (15.8%) |
| ||
| 28th wk | 1 (3.6%) | 3 (8.6%) |
| ||
aCalculated using RM-ANOVA. bCalculated using Chi-Square test.
Remarks: right uterine artery RI was significantly improved in the yoga group, while the PI was near significance along with the RI and PI of left uterine artery.
Fetoplacental circulation between groups.
| Gestational age | Mean ± SD |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoga ( | Control ( | ||||
| Umbilical artery | Systolic/diastolic ratio | 20th wk | 2.7 ± 0.41 | 3.3 ± 1.1 |
|
| 28th wk | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 2.9 ± 0.6 |
| ||
| Pulsatility index | 20th wk | 1.01 ± 0.18 | 1.37 ± 0.34 |
| |
| 28th wk | 0.87 ± 0.18 | 1.05 ± 0.23 |
| ||
| Resistance index | 20th wk | 0.65 ± 0.05 | 0.70 ± 0.09 |
| |
| 28th wk | 0.63 ± 0.08 | 0.66 ± 0.06 |
| ||
|
| |||||
| Fetal middle cerebral artery | Systolic/diastolic ratio | 20th wk | 5.02 ± 1.47 | 5.77 ± 2.04 |
|
| 28th wk | 5.05 ± 1.64 | 6.62 ± 2.26 |
| ||
| Pulsatility index | 20th wk | 1.86 ± 0.45 | 2.18 ± 0.67 |
| |
| 28th wk | 1.74 ± 0.53 | 2.28 ± 1.10 |
| ||
| Resistance index | 20th wk | 0.77 ± 0.07 | 0.80 ± 0.07 |
| |
| 28th wk | 0.80 ± 0.08 | 0.85 ± 0.08 |
| ||
aCalculated using Independent Samples t-test.
bCalculated using Mann-Whitney test.
Remarks: S/D ratio, PI, and RI parameters of umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries were significantly improved in the yoga group after 16 weeks of intervention, except for the RI of umbilical artery, which was near significance.