Fábio S Lira1, Valéria L G Panissa, Ursula F Julio, Emerson Franchini. 1. Exercise and Immunometabolism Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Rua Roberto Simonsen 305, Presidente Prudente, 19060-900, SP, Brazil, fabiolira@fct.unesp.br.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of upper and lower body high-intensity intermittent exercise (HIIE) on immunometabolism profile. METHODS: Seven male judo athletes completed two experimental sessions separated by at least 48 h. The athletes completed four bouts of the upper and lower body Wingate tests separated by 3-min recovery periods. The blood samples were collected at rest and immediately after the fourth bout of lower and upper body Wingate tests. Serum was analysed for IL-1ra (Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist), interleukins (IL-1) IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor alpha), cortisol, glucose, and NEFA (non-ester fatty acid). Peak power (maximum power attained during the 30 s test), mean power were calculated. In addition, after 1 and 2.5-min of each Wingate bout, blood samples from the ear lobe were collected for lactate analysis. RESULTS: Our data demonstrated that lower body HIIE promoted a greater metabolic rate (values pre- vs. post-Wingate, for lactate: 1.02 ± 0.16 vs. 14.44 ± 1.08 mmol/L; for glucose: 112.5 ± 16.7 vs. 147.9 ± 23.5 mg/dL) and resulted in higher mechanical (mean power: 621 ± 46 vs. 427 ± 40 W, peak power: 794 ± 61 vs. 602 ± 109 W) performance compared to the upper body HIIE (lactate: 0.85 ± 0.18 vs. 12.69 ± 0.74 mmol/L; for glucose: 115.3 ± 20.4 vs. 123.7 ± 28.6 mg/dL; mean power: 480 ± 46 vs. 341 ± 45 W; and peak power: 672 ± 83 vs. 501 ± 120 W), but NEFA showed a similar response to both conditions, with increased IL-10 levels. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our results demonstrated that despite the higher performance in lower body HIIE, the inflammatory response did not differ between exercise modalities.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of upper and lower body high-intensity intermittent exercise (HIIE) on immunometabolism profile. METHODS: Seven male judo athletes completed two experimental sessions separated by at least 48 h. The athletes completed four bouts of the upper and lower body Wingate tests separated by 3-min recovery periods. The blood samples were collected at rest and immediately after the fourth bout of lower and upper body Wingate tests. Serum was analysed for IL-1ra (Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist), interleukins (IL-1) IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor alpha), cortisol, glucose, and NEFA (non-ester fatty acid). Peak power (maximum power attained during the 30 s test), mean power were calculated. In addition, after 1 and 2.5-min of each Wingate bout, blood samples from the ear lobe were collected for lactate analysis. RESULTS: Our data demonstrated that lower body HIIE promoted a greater metabolic rate (values pre- vs. post-Wingate, for lactate: 1.02 ± 0.16 vs. 14.44 ± 1.08 mmol/L; for glucose: 112.5 ± 16.7 vs. 147.9 ± 23.5 mg/dL) and resulted in higher mechanical (mean power: 621 ± 46 vs. 427 ± 40 W, peak power: 794 ± 61 vs. 602 ± 109 W) performance compared to the upper body HIIE (lactate: 0.85 ± 0.18 vs. 12.69 ± 0.74 mmol/L; for glucose: 115.3 ± 20.4 vs. 123.7 ± 28.6 mg/dL; mean power: 480 ± 46 vs. 341 ± 45 W; and peak power: 672 ± 83 vs. 501 ± 120 W), but NEFA showed a similar response to both conditions, with increased IL-10 levels. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our results demonstrated that despite the higher performance in lower body HIIE, the inflammatory response did not differ between exercise modalities.
Authors: Fábio Santos Lira; Jose Cesar Rosa; Ronaldo Vagner Dos Santos; Daniel Paulino Venancio; June Carnier; Priscila de Lima Sanches; Claudia Maria Oller do Nascimento; Aline de Piano; Lian Tock; Sergio Tufik; Marco Túlio de Mello; Ana R Dâmaso; Lila Missae Oyama Journal: Metabolism Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: José C Rosa; Fábio S Lira; Ricardo Eguchi; Gustavo D Pimentel; Daniel P Venâncio; Cláudio A Cunha; Lila M Oyama; Marco T De Mello; Marília Seelaender; Cláudia M Oller do Nascimento Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Yoav Meckel; Alon Eliakim; Mariana Seraev; Frank Zaldivar; Dan M Cooper; Michael Sagiv; Dan Nemet Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Carolina Cabral-Santos; Carlos I M Castrillón; Rodolfo A T Miranda; Paula A Monteiro; Daniela S Inoue; Eduardo Z Campos; Peter Hofmann; Fábio S Lira Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Andrzej Kochanowicz; Stanisław Sawczyn; Bartłomiej Niespodziński; Jan Mieszkowski; Kazimierz Kochanowicz; Małgorzata Żychowska Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Fabio Santos Lira; Thaislaine Dos Santos; Renan Santos Caldeira; Daniela S Inoue; Valéria L G Panissa; Carolina Cabral-Santos; Eduardo Z Campos; Bruno Rodrigues; Paula A Monteiro Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Małgorzata Żychowska; Andrzej Kochanowicz; Kazimierz Kochanowicz; Jan Mieszkowski; Bartłomiej Niespodziński; Stanisław Sawczyn Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Kinga Humińska-Lisowska; Jan Mieszkowski; Andrzej Kochanowicz; Aleksandra Bojarczuk; Bartłomiej Niespodziński; Paulina Brzezińska; Błażej Stankiewicz; Monika Michałowska-Sawczyn; Anna Grzywacz; Miroslav Petr; Paweł Cięszczyk Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 4.614