Literature DB >> 25687610

Nonstationary porosity evolution in mixing zone in coastal carbonate aquifer using an alternative modeling approach.

Ezzeddine Laabidi1, Rachida Bouhlila.   

Abstract

In the last few decades, hydrogeochemical problems have benefited from the strong interest in numerical modeling. One of the most recognized hydrogeochemical problems is the dissolution of the calcite in the mixing zone below limestone coastal aquifer. In many works, this problem has been modeled using a coupling algorithm between a density-dependent flow model and a geochemical model. A related difficulty is that, because of the high nonlinearity of the coupled set of equations, high computational effort is needed. During calcite dissolution, an increase in permeability can be identified, which can induce an increase in the penetration of the seawater into the aquifer. The majority of the previous studies used a fully coupled reactive transport model in order to model such problem. Romanov and Dreybrodt (J Hydrol 329:661-673, 2006) have used an alternative approach to quantify the porosity evolution in mixing zone below coastal carbonate aquifer at steady state. This approach is based on the analytic solution presented by Phillips (1991) in his book Flow and Reactions in Permeable Rock, which shows that it is possible to decouple the complex set of equation. This equation is proportional to the square of the salinity gradient, which can be calculated using a density driven flow code and to the reaction rate that can be calculated using a geochemical code. In this work, this equation is used in nonstationary step-by-step regime. At each time step, the quantity of the dissolved calcite is quantified, the change of porosity is calculated, and the permeability is updated. The reaction rate, which is the second derivate of the calcium equilibrium concentration in the equation, is calculated using the PHREEQC code (Parkhurst and Apello 1999). This result is used in GEODENS (Bouhlila 1999; Bouhlila and Laabidi 2008) to calculate change of the porosity after calculating the salinity gradient. For the next time step, the same protocol is used but using the updated porosity and permeability distributions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25687610     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4207-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  3 in total

1.  Historical relationship between performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal and other types of risk assessment.

Authors:  R P Rechard
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Transport of a decay chain in homogenous porous media: analytical solutions.

Authors:  P Bauer; S Attinger; W Kinzelbach
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.188

3.  Reactive dispersive contaminant transport in coastal aquifers: numerical simulation of a reactive Henry problem.

Authors:  H M Nick; A Raoof; F Centler; M Thullner; P Regnier
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.188

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.