Gun Woo Lee1, Sun-Mi Lee2, Myun-Whan Ahn3, Ho-Joong Kim4, Jin S Yeom4. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Armed Forces Yangju Hospital, 461 Yongam-ri, Eunhyeon-myeon, Yangju 482-863, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: gwlee1871@gmail.com. 2. Department of Family Medicine, Myongji Hospital, 55 Hwasu-ro, Deogyang-gu, Goyang 412-270, Republic of Korea. 3. Spine Center and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, 170 Hyeonchung-ro, Nam-gu, Daegu 705-703, Republic of Korea. 4. Spine Center and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gumi-dong, Budang-gu, Sungnam 463-707, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although direct repair (DR) with screw fixation at the pars defect is a common surgical treatment for lumbar spondylolysis, it is unknown whether DR leads to better outcomes for young patients with spondylolysis than traditional nonsurgical treatment. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate whether DR was associated with better outcomes for lumbar spondylolysis in young patients than traditional conservative treatment. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Of 1,784 patients with low back pain in the reference period, 149 young patients with spondylolysis who followed up for at least 1 year were enrolled in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was pain intensity at the lower back measured with a Visual Analog Scale. Secondary outcomes included the functional outcome as measured with the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) consisting of the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores, the radiologic outcome as measured with lumbar spine radiographs and computed tomography scans, and complications of treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective comparative study between two groups of patients who were treated with either conservative treatment or surgery for lumbar spondylolysis. Enrolled patients self-selected their own treatment and were allocated to either the traditional care group with conservative treatment (87 patients) or the surgery group (62 patients). All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. RESULTS: Pain intensity at the lower back did not differ significantly between groups at the final follow-up. Likewise, the ODI and SF-12 (PCS and MCS) scores did not differ significantly between groups (p=.13, .71, and .68, respectively). The change in the gap distance of the pars defect at the final follow-up was significantly different between groups (traditional care group: +0.8±0.4 mm; surgery group: -0.7±0.5; p=.01). The union rate at 1 year after surgical treatment was 52% (32/61). The rate of complications was significantly higher in the surgery group (31%) than the traditional care group (20%) (p=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment for young patients with spondylolysis may produce similar clinical outcomes and fewer complications over 12-month follow-up than surgical treatment with DR.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although direct repair (DR) with screw fixation at the pars defect is a common surgical treatment for lumbar spondylolysis, it is unknown whether DR leads to better outcomes for young patients with spondylolysis than traditional nonsurgical treatment. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate whether DR was associated with better outcomes for lumbar spondylolysis in young patients than traditional conservative treatment. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Of 1,784 patients with low back pain in the reference period, 149 young patients with spondylolysis who followed up for at least 1 year were enrolled in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was pain intensity at the lower back measured with a Visual Analog Scale. Secondary outcomes included the functional outcome as measured with the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) consisting of the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores, the radiologic outcome as measured with lumbar spine radiographs and computed tomography scans, and complications of treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective comparative study between two groups of patients who were treated with either conservative treatment or surgery for lumbar spondylolysis. Enrolled patients self-selected their own treatment and were allocated to either the traditional care group with conservative treatment (87 patients) or the surgery group (62 patients). All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. RESULTS:Pain intensity at the lower back did not differ significantly between groups at the final follow-up. Likewise, the ODI and SF-12 (PCS and MCS) scores did not differ significantly between groups (p=.13, .71, and .68, respectively). The change in the gap distance of the pars defect at the final follow-up was significantly different between groups (traditional care group: +0.8±0.4 mm; surgery group: -0.7±0.5; p=.01). The union rate at 1 year after surgical treatment was 52% (32/61). The rate of complications was significantly higher in the surgery group (31%) than the traditional care group (20%) (p=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment for young patients with spondylolysis may produce similar clinical outcomes and fewer complications over 12-month follow-up than surgical treatment with DR.
Authors: Daniel Chepurin; Uphar Chamoli; Kyle Sheldrick; Samuel Lapkin; David Scott; Jeff Kuan; Ashish D Diwan Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 3.134