Marisa E Domino1, Rebecca Wells, Joseph P Morrissey. 1. Dr. Domino and Dr. Morrissey are with the Department of Health Policy and Management and the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (e-mail: domino@unc.edu ). Dr. Wells is with the Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, University of Texas, Houston. Portions of this work were presented at the National Institutes of Mental Health economics meeting, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 11-13, 2012.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Primary care-based medical homes are rapidly disseminating through populations with chronic illnesses. Little is known about how these models affect the patterns of care for persons with severe mental illness who typically receive much of their care from mental health specialists. This study examined whether enrollment in a primary care medical home alters the patterns of care for Medicaid enrollees with severe mental illness. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective secondary data analysis of medication adherence, outpatient and emergency department visits, and screening services used by adult Medicaid enrollees with diagnoses of schizophrenia (N=7,228), bipolar disorder (N=13,406), or major depression (N=45,000) as recorded in North Carolina Medicaid claims from 2004-2007. Participants not enrolled in a medical home (control group) were matched by propensity score to medical home participants on the basis of demographic characteristics and comorbidities. Those dually enrolled in Medicare were excluded. RESULTS: Results indicate that medical home enrollees had greater use of both primary and specialty mental health care, better medication adherence, and reduced use of the emergency department. Better rates of preventive lipid and cancer screening were found only for persons with major depression. CONCLUSIONS: Enrollment in a medical home was associated with substantial changes in patterns of care among persons with severe mental illness. These changes were associated with only a modest set of incentives, suggesting that medical homes can have large multiplier effects in primary care of persons with severe mental illness.
OBJECTIVE: Primary care-based medical homes are rapidly disseminating through populations with chronic illnesses. Little is known about how these models affect the patterns of care for persons with severe mental illness who typically receive much of their care from mental health specialists. This study examined whether enrollment in a primary care medical home alters the patterns of care for Medicaid enrollees with severe mental illness. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective secondary data analysis of medication adherence, outpatient and emergency department visits, and screening services used by adult Medicaid enrollees with diagnoses of schizophrenia (N=7,228), bipolar disorder (N=13,406), or major depression (N=45,000) as recorded in North Carolina Medicaid claims from 2004-2007. Participants not enrolled in a medical home (control group) were matched by propensity score to medical home participants on the basis of demographic characteristics and comorbidities. Those dually enrolled in Medicare were excluded. RESULTS: Results indicate that medical home enrollees had greater use of both primary and specialty mental health care, better medication adherence, and reduced use of the emergency department. Better rates of preventive lipid and cancer screening were found only for persons with major depression. CONCLUSIONS: Enrollment in a medical home was associated with substantial changes in patterns of care among persons with severe mental illness. These changes were associated with only a modest set of incentives, suggesting that medical homes can have large multiplier effects in primary care of persons with severe mental illness.
Authors: Lexie R Grove; William J Olesiuk; Alan R Ellis; Jesse C Lichstein; C Annette DuBard; Joel F Farley; Carlos T Jackson; Christopher A Beadles; Joseph P Morrissey; Marisa Elena Domino Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Emma E McGinty; Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Sarah Linden; Seema Choksy; Elizabeth Stone; Gail L Daumit Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2017-12-16 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Maria K Mor; John P Cashy; Adam J Gordon; Gretchen L Haas; James H Schaefer; Leslie R M Hausmann Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lakshmi N Yatham; Sidney H Kennedy; Sagar V Parikh; Ayal Schaffer; David J Bond; Benicio N Frey; Verinder Sharma; Benjamin I Goldstein; Soham Rej; Serge Beaulieu; Martin Alda; Glenda MacQueen; Roumen V Milev; Arun Ravindran; Claire O'Donovan; Diane McIntosh; Raymond W Lam; Gustavo Vazquez; Flavio Kapczinski; Roger S McIntyre; Jan Kozicky; Shigenobu Kanba; Beny Lafer; Trisha Suppes; Joseph R Calabrese; Eduard Vieta; Gin Malhi; Robert M Post; Michael Berk Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 6.744