| Literature DB >> 25686713 |
Jenny Domey1, Christian Bergemann2, Sibylle Bremer-Streck3, Ines Krumbein4, Jürgen R Reichenbach4, Ulf Teichgräber1, Ingrid Hilger1.
Abstract
Inflammation is a very common disease worldwide. In severe cases, surgery is often the method of choice. Today, there is a general need for the implementation of image-based guidance methodologies for reliable target resection. We investigated new near infrared fluorescence (NIRF)-nanoparticles (NPs) as a simple but effective bimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and optical contrast agent for diagnosis and intraoperative imaging of inflammation. Physicochemical analysis revealed that these NPs were highly fluorescent with similar characteristics like unlabeled NPs (hydrodynamic diameter about 130 nm and zeta potential about -10 mV). NP-uptake and NIR-dye labeling was biocompatible to macrophages (no impact on cellular ATP and reactive oxygen species production). These cells could successfully be tracked with MRI and NIRF-optical imaging. I.v. injection of fluorescent NPs into mice led to highly specific T2-weighted signal of edema due to uptake by phagocytic cells and subsequent migration to the site of inflammation. NIRF signals of the edema region were well detectable for up to 4 weeks, underlining the potential of the NPs for systematic planning and flexible time scheduling in intraoperative applications. NPs were degraded over a time period of 12 weeks, which was not altered due to inflammation. Redistribution of iron might be primarily due to inflammation and not to the presence of NPs per se in a concentration suitable for imaging. Our findings highlight the potential of the NPs to be used as a suitable tool for pre- and intraoperative imaging of inflammation.Entities:
Keywords: Biocompatibility; MRI; biodistribution; degradation; optical imaging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25686713 PMCID: PMC4819594 DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2014.1000413
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanotoxicology ISSN: 1743-5390 Impact factor: 5.913
Figure 1. Characterization of fluorescent and nonfluorescent NPs and dye IR780. (A) Scheme of (i) fluorescent and (ii) nonfluorescent NPs. (B) NIRF-imaging of fluorescently labeled and nonfluorescent NPs diluted in deionized water. In contrast to nonfluorescent NPs fluorescently labeled NPs show a detectable NIR fluorescent signal. (C) Spectral analysis of free lipophilic dye IR780 dissolved in ethanol and IR780-labeled NPs diluted in double-distilled water. (D–E) Image-based detection of NP-labeled murine macrophages (J774A.1-cells) embedded in 1% agarose in vitro. (D) Fluorescence and (E) MR imaging (at 1.5 T). (D) (i) Intensity scaled NIRF-images and (ii) fluorescence signaling of NP-treated cells. (E) R 2-relaxation rates of (i) fluorescent and nonfluorescent NPs in macrophages and (ii) related to the cellular iron content.
Physicochemical characterization of fluorescent and nonfluorescent NPs.
| NP | Size [nm] | Polydispersity index | Zeta potential (mV) | Specific surface area (m2/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluorescent NPsa | 134 ± 1.3 | 0.108 ± 0.011 | 8.1 ± 0.3 | 24.2 |
| Non-fluorescent NPsa | 129 ± 0.6 | 0.112 ± 0.013 | 10.5 ± 0.4 | 14.8 |
| Fluorescent NPsb | 320 ± 108 | 0.285 ± 0.12 | −29 ± 1.2 | – |
| Non-fluorescent NPsb | 344 ± 30 | 0.423 ± 0.11 | −28 ± 1.5 | – |
Size, zeta potential in deionized water and after 24 h incubation in DMEM + 10% FCS and specific surface area.
aDeionized water.
bAfter 24 h incubation in DMEM + 10% FCS.
Determination of relaxivities r 1, r 2 and r 2* for NP after cellular uptake at 1.5 T, 25 °C.
| NP | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluorescent NPs | 0.36 | 24 | 797 |
| Non-fluorescent NPs | 0.42 | 31 | 993 |
Figure 2. Effect of fluorescent and nonfluorescent NPs on metabolic activities in murine macrophages. (A) Uptake of NPs in J774A.1-cells after incubation with NPs (25 µg Fe/ml, 24 h). Scale bar: 50 µm. (B) Relative ATP-level of J774A.1 cells. Cells incubated with increasing concentrations of (i) fluorescent (ii) or nonfluorescent NP. Relative was ATP-level normalized to untreated control cells (ATP-production 100%), cell death positive control: 5% DMSO. Four independent experiments with six repetitions each were performed. (C) Effect of fluorescent NPs on ROS production in J774A.1 cells after incubation with (i) fluorescent (ii) or nonfluorescent NPs. ROS-level was normalized to the ROS production of untreated control cells (ROS production level 1), positive control for ROS production: 5% DMSO. Three independent experiments with three repetitions each were performed. Results are represented as mean values ± standard error of mean compared to untreated control cells. *p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3. MRI of mononuclear phagocytic cells in hind leg edema with fluorescent NPs in NMRI-mice. Subcutaneous edema was induced at right hind leg using 1% zymosan A solution (ZyA). NaCl-solution injected s.c. at left hind leg served as a control for edema development. Fluorescent NPs were injected i.v. in edema bearing mice (40 μmol Fe/kg bw). NaCl solution (control of NP signal) was injected to a further group of edema bearing mice. The NP distribution was documented 8 h p.i. with 3 T MRI. (A) T2-weighted MR-images of hind leg edema bearing mice treated with either fluorescent NPs (left) or NaCl solution (right) in (i) longitudinal or (ii) transverse view. The arrows show the bright cyst of edema which can clearly be distinguished from the rest of edema only after NP accumulation (NPs represent a dark region around edema cyst) (B) Dissection of edema region. (a) The edema consists of a cyst (arrow), which is filled with pus and surrounded by proteinous liquid. (b) Skin of edema side (after s.c. zymosan-injection) exhibiting glossy proteinous liquid and (c) skin of control site (after s.c. NaCl-injection). (C) Relative signal changes which were determined from the T2-weighted images by using muscle tissue as reference signal.
Figure 4. Optical imaging of mononuclear phagocytic cells in hind leg edema with fluorescent NPs in NMRI-mice. Edema was induced subcutaneously at right hind leg using 1% zymosan A solution. NaCl-solution injected s.c. at left hind leg served as a control for edema development. Edema-bearing mice were injected i.v. with fluorescent NPs (40 μmol Fe/kg bw) showing an increasing NIRF-signal within edema region starting from 2 h up to a maximum at 48 h after NP-injection. Nonfluorescent NPs and NaCl solution served as a control for specific edema signaling exhibiting no fluorescence within the inflammable region. To confirm NP uptake in mononuclear phagocytic cells mice were treated with methylprednisolone leading to about half of the fluorescence intensity in the edema region compared to the group without treatment. *p< 0.05. A further group of mice was injected with fluorescent NP-labeled macrophages which were accumulating within the area of edema region similarly to the bimodal NPs. (i) Semi-quantitative analysis of NIRF-signals in edema region after i.v. injection and (ii) intensity scaled NIRF-images of mice abdomen exhibiting fluorescently-labeled cells of the MPS within edema region.
Figure 5. Systemic biodistribution of fluorescent NPs in NMRI-mice. Edema bearing and healthy mice were injected i.v. with fluorescent NPs (40 µmol Fe/kg bw). For each group control mice received unlabeled NPs or NaCl solution instead. (A) Quantification of Fe-content in edema and mice organs of (i) edema bearing mice (ii) or healthy mice 24 h, 4 and 12 weeks after application of NPs. (B) Analysis of fluorescent NP biodistribution in NMRI-mice with a NIRF small animal scanner. Fluorescence intensity of edema and various organs of (i) edema bearing (ii) and healthy mice ex vivo. (C) Histological analysis of tissues by Prussian blue staining 24 h after application of fluorescent NPs in edema-bearing mice. Representative organs, hosting cells of the MPS (liver and spleen) are shown compared to the unlabeled NP pendant and NaCl-treated control mice. Red arrows indicate Fe3+ located within cells. Scale bar: 10 µm.