| Literature DB >> 25685533 |
Dalia S Abd Elaziz1, Mona H Hafez1, Nermeen M Galal1, Safa S Meshaal2, Aisha M El Marsafy1.
Abstract
The existence of multiple autoimmune disorders in diabetics may indicate underlying primary defects of immune regulation. The study aims at estimation of defects of CD4(+) CD25(+high) cells among diabetic children with multiple autoimmune manifestations, and identification of disease characteristics in those children. Twenty-two cases with type 1 diabetes associated with other autoimmune diseases were recruited from the Diabetic Endocrine and Metabolic Pediatric Unit (DEMPU), Cairo University along with twenty-one normal subjects matched for age and sex as a control group. Their anthropometric measurements, diabetic profiles and glycemic control were recorded. Laboratory investigations included complete blood picture, glycosylated hemoglobin, antithyroid antibodies, celiac antibody panel and inflammatory bowel disease markers when indicated. Flow cytometric analysis of T-cell subpopulation was performed using anti-CD3, anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies. Three cases revealed a proportion of CD4(+) CD25(+high) below 0.1% and one case had zero counts. However, this observation did not mount to a significant statistical difference between the case and control groups neither in percentage nor absolute numbers. Significant statistical differences were observed between the case and the control groups regarding their height, weight centiles, as well as hemoglobin percentage, white cell counts and the absolute lymphocytic counts. We concluded that, derangements of CD4(+) CD25(+high) cells may exist among diabetic children with multiple autoimmune manifestations indicating defects of immune controllers.Entities:
Keywords: Autoimmunity; CD4+ CD25+ cells; Children; T regulatory cells; Type1 diabetes mellitus
Year: 2013 PMID: 25685533 PMCID: PMC4293905 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2013.09.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
Comparison between the case and control groups regarding their growth parameters: (Mann Whitney U test).
| Number | Median | IQR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight SDS | Case | 22 | −.700 | 3.4 | 0.05 |
| Control | 21 | .100 | 2.1 | ||
| Height SDS | Case | 22 | −1.250 | 3.2 | 0.004 |
| Control | 21 | −.200 | 1.9 | ||
IQR: Inter quartile range.
SDS: standard deviation score.
P < 0.05.
Fig. 1Comparison between cases and control groups regarding their height on the Egyptian growth chart (percentiles).
Clinical pattern and glycemic control in the case group.
| No | Age | Onet of DM | Clinical features | Infections | No of DKA | Therapy | HbA1c% (mmol/ml) | CD4+ CD25+high % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.4 | 6.25 | Hypothyroid HT, ST | No | 2 | Thyroxin | 10.8%(95) | 0.44 |
| 2 | 7.7 | 2.55 | Celiac, hypothyroid HT, ST | Hepatitis A | 1 | Thyroxin | 15%(140) | 0.28 |
| 3 | 14.4 | 7.17 | Celiac, Euthyroid HT, ST | No | 6 | 7.4%(57) | 0.28 | |
| 4 | 12.3 | 5.23 | Euthyroid HT | Sepsis (ICU) admission | 2 | 9.5%(80) | 0.45 | |
| 5 | 10.9 | 8.63 | Hypothyroid HT | RTI | 0 | Thyroxin | 7.2%(55) | 0.36 |
| 6 | 11 | 4.42 | Hypothyroid HT, ST | No | 1 | Thyroxin | 8.4%(68) | 0.19 |
| 7 | 5.4 | 4.73 | Hypothyroid HT | No | 1 | Thyroxin | 7.1%(54) | 0.29 |
| 8 | 11.1 | 1.27 | Celiac, Ulcerative colitis, Euthyroid HT | URTI, Pneumonia, GIT with | 0 | IS | 8.4%(68) | 0.07 |
| 9 | 12.1 | 0.2 | Autoimmune hepatitis, ST, (Wolcott-Rallison Syndrome) | Otitis media, Chicken Pox, Roseola infection UTI with | 1 | IS | 10.5%(91) | 0.09 |
| 10 | 11.5 | 4.8 | Hypothyroid HT | No | 0 | Thyroxin | 11.5% (102) | 0.48 |
| 11 | 6.43 | 5.38 | Euthyroid HT | No | 0 | 6.9%(52) | 0.88 | |
| 12 | 18.8 | 2.9 | Celiac | RTI | >10 | 12.5% (113) | 0.45 | |
| 13 | 14.5 | 9.9 | Celiac, ST | RTI | 1 | 13%(119) | 0.38 | |
| 14 | 12.44 | 9.7 | Euthyroid HT Aplastic anemia, SLE | EBV , CMV Oral moniliasis Wound infection with | 0 | IS | 5%(31) | 0.0 |
| 15 | 10.09 | 9.2 | Euthyroid HT | No | O | 7.45%(58) | 0.28 | |
| 16 | 4.1 | 3 | Euthyroid HT | NO | 0 | 7.4%(57) | 0.43 | |
| 17 | 15.58 | 12.3 | Crohns disease Epiliptogenic dysfunction by EEG | RTI Otitis media | 0 | IS | 10.2%(88) | 1.41 |
| 18 | 9.12 | 7.9 | Euthyroid HT | NO | 1 | 9.6%(81) | 0.07 | |
| 19 | 14.15 | 8 | Hypothyroid HT | NO | 1 | Thyroxin | 8.5%(69) | 1.15 |
| 20 | 15.2 | 9.5 | Euthyroid HT, Addison disease | No | 1 | Asitonin H, Hydrocortisone. | 12.2% (110) | 0.28 |
| 21 | 20.87 | 1 | Hypothyroid HT, Alopecia, neutropenia | Recurrent oral, vaginal ulcers and superficial abscess | 0 | Thyroxin | 7.7%(61) | 0.79 |
| 22 | 5.35 | 5.3 | Hepatitis? Alopecia Autoimmune hemolytic anemia | 0 | IS | 6.3%(57) | 0.47 |
Legend; DM: diabetes mellitus, DKA: diabetic ketoacidosis, HbA1c: glycosylated heamoglobin, HT: Hashimoto thyroiditis, RTI: respiratory tract infection, URTI: upper respiratory tract infection, GIT: gastroenteritis, IS: immunosuppressive drugs, EBV: Epstein barr virus, CMV: Cytomegalovirus, EEG: electroencephalogram, ST:short stature, ICU: intensive care unit.
Comparison between case and control groups regarding the Hemoglobin, WBC’s and T cell subpopulations.
| Group ( | Mean | SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | Case (22) | 11.491 | 1.4527 | 0.01 |
| Control (21) | 12.40 | 0.5128 | ||
| WBC’s (×10.e3/μl) | Case | 6.464 | 3.0288 | 0.010 |
| Control | 8.524 | 1.7815 | ||
| Neutrophil (%) | Case | 44.95% | 12.124 | 0.441 |
| Control | 47.52% | 9.250 | ||
| ANC | Case | 3108.77 | 2028.515 | 0.085 |
| Control | 4039.10 | 1338.911 | ||
| Lymph (%) | Case | 45.59% | 11.927 | 0.724 |
| Control | 44.48% | 8.232 | ||
| ALC | Case | 2763.55 | 1071.28 | 0.004 |
| Control | 3805.52 | 1153.876 | ||
| CD3+% | Case | 63.364% | 7.6100 | 0.348 |
| Control | 60.810% | 9.9257 | ||
| Absolute no of CD3+ | Case | 1730.45 | 687.840 | 0.019 |
| Control | 2300.57 | 840.763 | ||
| CD3+CD4+ % | Case | 35.01% | 7.1393 | 0.360 |
| Control | 37.071% | 7.4078 | ||
| Absolute no of CD3+CD4+ | Case | 934.14 | 336.222 | 0.002 |
| Control | 1371.1 | 495.052 | ||
| CD3+CD8+ % | Case | 28.268% | 6.7149 | 0.029 |
| Control | 23.762% | 6.3231 | ||
| Absolute no of CD3+CD8+ | Case | 800.55 | 428.011 | 0.415 |
| Control | 901.81 | 374.601 | ||
| CD4+CD25+high % | Case | 0.430% | 0.34913 | 0.82 |
| Control | 0.4086% | 0.2643 | ||
| MFI | Case | 0.55 | 1.342 | 0.069 |
| Contol | 2.93 | 5.834 | ||
| Absolute no of CD4+CD25+high | Case | 3.0412 | 3.73 | 0.099 |
| Control | 4.2380 | 5.55 |
WBC: white blood cells, ANC: absolute neutrophilic count.
ALC: absolute lymphocytic count.
The absolute count of CD4+CD25+ was done by Mann Whitney U test (Median, IQR), the others were done by T-test.
P < 0.05.
Fig. 2Comparison of the absolute number of CD3+ CD4+ in cases and control group.
Fig. 3Flow cytometric results of patient 14: The lymphocyte, as it was identified by their forward and side scatter properties were gated for coexpression of CD4+ and CD25+high. CD4+CD25+high = 0%.
Fig. 4By analyzing the Roc curve of absolute CD4+ CD25+high it did not achieve under the curve >65% and it was of no significant P-value.
Fig. 5Whisker and box plot comparison of the absolute counts of CD4+ CD25+high in both cases and control groups.
Fig. 6Flow cytometric results of patient 9: The lymphocyte, as it was identified by their forward and side scatter properties were gated (a) for co expression of CD4+ and CD25+high. CD4+CD25+high = 0.09% (b) compared to one of the healthy controls (c and d) where the CD4+CD25+high = 1.37%.