| Literature DB >> 25685484 |
Khalil Ahmed1, Shaikh Sirajuddin Nizami2, Nudrat Zahid Riza1.
Abstract
A research has been carried out to develop natural rubber (NR) hybrid composites reinforced with marble sludge (MS)/Silica and MS/rice husk derived silica (RHS). The primary aim of this development is to scrutinize the cure characteristics, mechanical and swelling properties of such hybrid composite. The use of both industrial and agricultural waste such as marble sludge and rice husk derived silica has the primary advantage of being eco-friendly, low cost and easily available as compared to other expensive fillers. The results from this study showed that the performance of NR hybrid composites with MS/Silica and MS/RHS as fillers is extremely better in mechanical and swelling properties as compared with the case where MS used as single filler. The study suggests that the use of recently developed silica and marble sludge as industrial and agricultural waste is accomplished to provide a probable cost effective, industrially prospective, and attractive replacement to the in general purpose used fillers like china clay, calcium carbonate, and talc.Entities:
Keywords: Hybrid composite; Marble sludge; Mechanical properties; Natural rubber; Rice husk derived silica; Silica
Year: 2013 PMID: 25685484 PMCID: PMC4294726 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2013.01.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
Compound recipe of MS/Silica and MS/RHS hybrid filler NR composites.
| Ingredient | Part per hundred |
|---|---|
| NR | 100 |
| ZnO | 05 |
| Stearic acid | 02 |
| TMTD | 2.4 |
| Antioxidant | 1.5 |
| Sulfur | 1.6 |
| MS | 00/00, 60/00, 50/10, 40/20, |
| Hybrid filler loading | 30/30, 20/40, 10/50, 00/60 |
Microsize of MS and RHS particle, 38 μm.
Tetra methylthiuram disulfide.
3-Dimethylbutyl-N-phenyl-p-phenylenediami.
Quantitative analysis of marble sludge and rice husk silica using WDX-ray fluorescence Spectrometer Model: S4 Pioneer from Braker – axs Germany.
| Component | Weight % | |
|---|---|---|
| MS | RHS | |
| LOI at 750 °C | 2.56 | 3.38 |
| CaO | 68.6 | 0.62 |
| MgO | 22.13 | 0.45 |
| SiO2 | 3.89 | 93.58 |
| Al2O3 | 2.785 | 0.86 |
| Fe2O3 | 0.603 | 0.24 |
| Cr2O3 | 0.24 | – |
| ZnO | 0.20 | – |
| TiO | 0.549 | – |
| Na2O3 | – | 0.18 |
| K2O | – | 1.78 |
Fig. 1Thermo gravimetric (TGA) curve of marble sludge powder.
Data for the scorch time, cure time, minimum torque, maximum torque and cure rate index from cure characteristics of MS/Silica and MS/RHS hybrid filler NR composites.
| Hybrid filler ratio | Filler system | Cure characteristics at 170 °C for 20 min | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scorch time | Cure time | Min. torque (dNm) | Max. torque (dNm) | CRI (min−1) | ||
| 00/00 | Unfilled | 0.86 | 1.59 | 0.43 | 2.81 | 1.37 |
| 60/00 | MS-60 | 0.83 | 1.53 | 0.52 | 3.85 | 1.43 |
| 50/10 | MS/Silica | 0.82 | 1.48 | 0.56 | 4.26 | 1.51 |
| MS/RHS | 0.80 | 1.45 | 0.57 | 4.28 | 1.54 | |
| 40/20 | MS/Silica | 0.80 | 1.44 | 0.58 | 4.38 | 1.56 |
| MS/RHS | 0.79 | 1.41 | 0.59 | 4.41 | 1.61 | |
| 30/30 | MS/Silica | 0.76 | 1.41 | 0.67 | 4.59 | 1.54 |
| MS/RHS | 0.72 | 1.36 | 0.70 | 4.63 | 1.56 | |
| 20/40 | MS/Silica | 0.73 | 1.38 | 0.79 | 4.82 | 1.54 |
| MS/RHS | 0.67 | 1.32 | 0.82 | 4.85 | 1.54 | |
| 10/50 | MS/ Silica | 0.70 | 1.26 | 0.93 | 5.00 | 1.78 |
| MS/RHS | 0.63 | 1.21 | 0.98 | 5.07 | 1.72 | |
| 00/60 | MS/ Silica | 0.66 | 1.21 | 1.18 | 5.43 | 1.82 |
| MS/RHS | 0.59 | 1.16 | 1.20 | 5.53 | 1.75 | |
Fig. 2Relationship between hybrid filler loading and tensile strength of filled NR composites.
Properties of unfilled and filled with MS, 60 ppr NR composite before and after aging.
| Properties | Unfilled | MS, 60 phr |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength (MPa) | 3.13, {2.32} | 6.50, {5.44}, [1.74] |
| 300% modulus (MPa) | 0.95, {1.24}, [0.53] | 1.78, {2.25}, [1.34] |
| Tear strength (kg/cm) | 8.39,{5.78}, [5.42] | 16.80, {12.60}, [10.20] |
| % elongation at break | 1012, {683}, [465] | 885, {584}, [373] |
Values in parentheses are at {70 °C} and [100 °C] aging.
Correlation between hybrid filler loading and hardness of filled NR composites before and after aging.
| Hybrid filler loading | Filler system | Hardness, Shore-A | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value before aging | Aging at 70 °C for 96 h | Aging at 100 °C for 96 h | ||
| 00/00 | Unfilled | 38.0 | 42.0 | 43.0 |
| 60/00 | MS-60 | 51.2 | 54.0 | 57.0 |
| 50/10 | MS/Silica | 50.0 | 56.0 | 56.4 |
| MS/RHS | 49.0 | 54.3 | 52.0 | |
| 40/20 | MS/Silica | 53.0 | 58.6 | 56.5 |
| MS/RHS | 51.6 | 57.3 | 55.0 | |
| 30/30 | MS/Silica | 56.0 | 62.4 | 60.3 |
| MS/RHS | 54.0 | 60.0 | 58.0 | |
| 20/40 | MS/Silica | 62.0 | 69.0 | 69.3 |
| MS/RHS | 60.0 | 67.0 | 66.0 | |
| 10/50 | MS/Silica | 65.0 | 73.0 | 72.2 |
| MS/RHS | 64.0 | 72.0 | 71.0 | |
| 00/60 | MS/Silica | 70.0 | 83.5 | 78.3 |
| MS/RHS | 68.0 | 84.0 | 76.0 | |
Fig. 3Relationship between hybrid filler loading and 300% modulus of filled NR composites.
Fig. 4Relationship between hybrid filler loading and tear strength of filled NR composites.
Fig. 5Relationship between hybrid filler loading and % elongation at break of filled NR composites.
Data for the swelling coefficient (α) and crosslink density (ν) of MS/Silica and MS/RHS hybrid filler NR composites before and after aging from swelling measurements.
| Hybrid filler loading | Filler system | Swelling coefficient (g−1 cm3) | Crosslink density × 104 (mole/cm3) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value before aging | Aging at 70 °C for 96 h | Aging at 100 °C for 96 h | Value before aging | Aging at 70 °C for 96 h | Aging at 100 °C for 96 h | ||
| 00/00 | Unfilled | 4.26 | 6.63 | 6.16 | 1.636 | 0.740 | 0.837 |
| 60/00 | MS-60 | 3.58 | 3.86 | 4.37 | 1.437 | 1.266 | 1.021 |
| 50/10 | MS/Silica | 3.46 | 3.55 | 3.68 | 1.546 | 1.478 | 1.367 |
| MS/RHS | 3.59 | 3.64 | 3.78 | 1.510 | 1.450 | 1.378 | |
| 40/20 | MS/Silica | 3.38 | 3.48 | 3.61 | 1.674 | 1.576 | 1.466 |
| MS/RHS | 3.42 | 3.50 | 3.59 | 1.626 | 1.553 | 1.493 | |
| 30/30 | MS/Silica | 3.00 | 3.09 | 3.23 | 2.109 | 2.001 | 1.854 |
| MS/RHS | 3.15 | 3.27 | 3.41 | 1.843 | 1.768 | 1.638 | |
| 20/40 | MS/Silica | 2.79 | 2.89 | 3.08 | 2.436 | 2.292 | 2.055 |
| MS/RHS | 2.89 | 2.98 | 3.16 | 2.462 | 2.108 | 1.899 | |
| 10/50 | MS/Silica | 2.64 | 2.74 | 2.89 | 2.741 | 2.554 | 2.322 |
| MS/RHS | 2.73 | 2.81 | 3.11 | 2.480 | 2.362 | 1.958 | |
| 00/60 | MS/Silica | 2.40 | 2.50 | 2.65 | 3.302 | 3.073 | 2.767 |
| MS/RHS | 2.45 | 2.55 | 3.08 | 3.025 | 2.835 | 2.384 | |