| Literature DB >> 25685468 |
Ponnusamy Velusamy1, Sakthivel Pitchaimuthu1, Subramanian Rajalakshmi1, Nagarathinam Kannan1.
Abstract
The photocatalytic decoloration of an organic dye, ethyl violet (EV), has been studied in the presence of TiO2 and the addition of β-Cyclodextrin (β-CD) with TiO2 (TiO2-β-CD) under UV-A light irradiation. The different operating parameters like initial concentration of dye, illumination time, pH and amount of catalyst used have also been investigated. The photocatalytic decoloration efficiency is more in the TiO2-β-CD/UV-A light system than TiO2/UV-A light system. The mineralization of EV has been confirmed by Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) measurements. The complexation patterns have been confirmed with UV-Visible and FT-IR spectral data and the interaction between TiO2 and β-CD have been characterized by powder XRD analysis and UV-Visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.Entities:
Keywords: COD; Ethyl violet dye; Photocatalytic decoloration; TiO2; β-Cyclodextrin
Year: 2012 PMID: 25685468 PMCID: PMC4294739 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.10.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
Physical properties of ethyl violet dye and β-Cyclodextrin.
| Name | Ethyl violet | |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular formula | C31H42N3Cl | C42H70O35 |
| Molar weight | 492.2 | 1135 |
| Appearance | Dark violet powder | White powder |
| pH | 8.3 (Basic dye) | – |
| 595 nm | – |
Fig. 1X-ray powder diffraction patterns of: (a) TiO2, (b) 1:1 physical mixture of TiO2-β-CD and (c) β-CD.
Fig. 2Diffuse reflectance spectra of: (a) TiO2 and (b) TiO2-β-CD.
Fig. 4FT-IR spectral analysis. (a) β-CD (b) EV dye (c) physical mixture of β-CD/ethyl violet dye and (d) β-CD/EV 1:1 complex.
Fig. 5ln C/C vs. illumination time (min).
Fig. 6Effect of various operational parameters: where 1 – effect of initial concentration of EV dye solutions, 2 – effect of pH variation, 3 – effect of dose variation, 4 – effect of irradiation time.
Data obtained from the experimental parameters on photodegradation of EV dye under UV-A light irradiation.
| S. No | Parameters | Range | Percentage removal of EV dye | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2 | TiO2- | |||
| 1 | Initial concentration of EV dye (×10−5 M) | 1.02–6.10 | 94.0–58.0 | 98.2–78.0 |
| 2 | pH variation | 1–11 | 16.0–75.5 | 58.5–98.7 |
| 3 | TiO2 concentration (g L−1) | 1.25–7.5 | 49.5–72.3 | 69.7–93.5 |
| 4 | Irradiation time (min) | 30–180 | 47.5–68.0 | 73.5–96.5 |
Mineralisation.
| S. No | Initial pH of EV dye solution | Percentage reduction of COD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2 | TiO2- | ||
| 1 | 1 | 18.6 | 63.2 |
| 2 | 3 | 39 | 76.7 |
| 3 | 5 | 52.5 | 80.6 |
| 4 | 7 | 63.2 | 86.4 |
| 5 | 9 | 80.6 | 90.3 |
| 6 | 11 | 82.5 | 96.1 |
Fig. 7Plot of [C] [S]/ΔOD × 10–6 vs. {[C] + [S]} 10–5 for β-CD-EV dye complex.