| Literature DB >> 25685466 |
Wael M Lotfy1, Aly M Nageh2, Neveen A Hussein2, Ashraf A Hassan3.
Abstract
The conventional PCR technique was used for studying the schistosomicidal effect of Mirazid® in the murine model. Results of the molecular study were compared with the parasitological results (ova and worm count). The used PCR technique was more sensitive than the Kato-Katz thick smears. Mirazid® showed some schistosomicidal effects against murine Schistosoma mansoni. However, it was not efficient enough to cure any of the studied mice.Entities:
Keywords: Antischistosomal; Diagnosis; Mirazid; Murine; PCR; Schistosoma mansoni; Treatment
Year: 2012 PMID: 25685466 PMCID: PMC4294782 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.08.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
Fig. 1Mean egg count in stool samples (epg) of the Mirazid® treated mice before and after treatment.
Number of S. mansoni worms recovered from sacrificed mice of the infected groups.
| Free male Mean ± SD (range) | Free female Mean ± SD (range) | Couple Mean ± SD (range) | Total Mean ± SD (range) | Worm reduction after treatment ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated group | 7.3 ± 2 (4–10) | 3.8 ± 1.5 (2–7) | 9.1 ± 4.1 (4–17) | 29.3 ± 10.8 (14–48) | – |
| Mirazid® treated group | 2.6 ± 1.5 (1–5) | 1.1 ± 1.0 (0–3) | 3.0 ± 1.9 (1–7) | 9.0 ± 6.0 (3–22) | 69.3% (0.001) |
Fig. 2Results of the PCR for murine fecal samples of the infected control [A], uninfected control [B] and Mirazid® treated [C] groups (M: molecular weight marker, lanes 1–10: samples).