| Literature DB >> 25685416 |
Haitham S Mohammed1, Heba M Fahmy1, Nasr M Radwan2, Anwar A Elsayed1.
Abstract
In the present study, the alteration in the sleep EEG in rats due to chronic exposure to low-level non-thermal electromagnetic radiation was investigated. Two types of radiation fields were used; 900 MHz unmodulated wave and 900 MHz modulated at 8 and 16 Hz waves. Animals has exposed to radiation fields for 1 month (1 h/day). EEG power spectral analyses of exposed and control animals during slow wave sleep (SWS) and rapid eye movement sleep (REM sleep) revealed that the REM sleep is more susceptible to modulated radiofrequency radiation fields (RFR) than the SWS. The latency of REM sleep increased due to radiation exposure indicating a change in the ultradian rhythm of normal sleep cycles. The cumulative and irreversible effect of radiation exposure was proposed and the interaction of the extremely low frequency radiation with the similar EEG frequencies was suggested.Entities:
Keywords: Electroencephalogram; Electromagnetic radiation; Rapid eye movement sleep; Slow wave sleep
Year: 2012 PMID: 25685416 PMCID: PMC4195462 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.05.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
Fig. 2Exposure set-up of the animals with the antenna placed in the center.
Fig. 1EEG time domain signals and their corresponding power spectra during: (A) SWS and (B) REM sleep in an unexposed rat.
Effect of RFR on the EEG band power during SWS.
| SWS | EEG band | Control | 900 MHz | 900 MHz modulated at 8 Hz | 900 MHz modulated at 16 Hz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delta | 37.84 ± 2.27 | 32.59 ± 2.39 | 40.18 ± 3.45 | 37.75 ± 3.7 | |
| Theta | 28.04 ± 0.92 | 30.14 ± 0.66 | 29.07 ± 2.30 | 27.11 ± 0.58 | |
| Alpha | 17.91 ± 1.54 | 21.33 ± 1.11 | 16.73 ± 2.55 | 20.09 ± 2.12 | |
| Beta-1 | 9.18 ± 0.99 | 9.23 ± 0.50 | 8.37 ± 1.22 | 9.62 ± 1.51 | |
| Beta-2 | 6.97 ± 0.64 | 6.99 ± 0.70 | 5.62 ± 0.61 | 5.59 ± 0.84 |
Mean ± SEM values.
*Significant P < 0.05.
Fig. 3Percentage differences between control and irradiated groups of EEG bands power at 900 MHz un-modulated wave and 900 MHz modulated at 8 and 16 Hz during SWS.
Effect of RFR on the EEG band power during REM sleep.
| REM | EEG bands | Control | 900 MHz | 900 MHz modulated at 8 Hz | 900 MHz modulated at 16 Hz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delta | 23.36 ± 2.02 | 27.69 ± 2.86 | 26.68 ± 1.16 | 24.84 ± 3.73 | |
| Theta | 41.13 ± 2.10 | 42.05 ± 2.09 | 34.67 ± 1.53 | 49.14 ± 1.66 | |
| Alpha | 17.44 ± 2.09 | 13.97 ± 2.09 | 17.12 ± 1.82 | 12.54 ± 2.59 | |
| Beta-1 | 8.28 ± 0.56 | 6.76 ± 1.22 | 8.98 ± 1.15 | 5.98 ± 0.75 | |
| Beta-2 | 9.61 ± 1.32 | 9.49 ± 1.81 | 12.26 ± 1.14 | 7.47 ± 0.9 |
Mean ± SEM values.
Significant P < 0.05.
Fig. 4Percentage differences between control and irradiated groups of EEG bands power at 900 MHz un-modulated wave and 900 MHz modulated at 8 and 16 Hz during REM sleep.
Effect of RFR on latency (sec) of REM sleep during 1 h of sleep.
| REM latency | Control | 900 MHz | 900 MHz modulated at 8 Hz | 900 MHz modulated at 16 Hz |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.3 ± 1.11 | 22.2 ± 2.1 | 19.7 ± 2.45 | 33.6 ± 2.66 |
Mean ± SEM values.
Significant P < 0.05.
Fig. 5Latency in seconds of REM sleep for control, un-modulated and modulated electromagnetic radiation fields. Lines above bars represent standard deviation.