AIM: To assess the value of computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis of synchronous colorectal cancers (SCRCs) involving incomplete colonoscopy. METHODS: A total of 2123 cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) were reviewed and divided into two groups according to whether a complete or incomplete colonoscopy was performed. CT results and final histological findings were compared to calculate the sensitivity and specificity associated with CT for detection of SCRCs following complete vs incomplete colonoscopy. Factors affecting the CT detection were also analyzed. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-four CRC patients underwent incomplete colonoscopy and 1749 received complete colonoscopy. Fifty-six cases of SCRCs were identified by CT, and 36 were missed. In the incomplete colonoscopy group, the sensitivity and specificity of CT were 44.8% and 93.6%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 23.6% and 95.0%, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of CT for the complete colonoscopy group were 68.3% and 97.0%, while the positive and negative predictive values were 22.2% and 98.7%, respectively. In both groups, the mean maximum dimension of the concurrent cancers identified in the CT-negative cases was shorter than in the CT-positive cases (incomplete group: P = 0.02; complete group: P < 0.01) Topographical proximity to synchronous cancers was identified as a risk factor for missed diagnosis (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: CT has limited sensitivity in detecting SCRCs in patients receiving incomplete colonoscopy. Patients with risk factors and negative CT results should be closely examined and monitored.
AIM: To assess the value of computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis of synchronous colorectal cancers (SCRCs) involving incomplete colonoscopy. METHODS: A total of 2123 cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) were reviewed and divided into two groups according to whether a complete or incomplete colonoscopy was performed. CT results and final histological findings were compared to calculate the sensitivity and specificity associated with CT for detection of SCRCs following complete vs incomplete colonoscopy. Factors affecting the CT detection were also analyzed. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-four CRCpatients underwent incomplete colonoscopy and 1749 received complete colonoscopy. Fifty-six cases of SCRCs were identified by CT, and 36 were missed. In the incomplete colonoscopy group, the sensitivity and specificity of CT were 44.8% and 93.6%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 23.6% and 95.0%, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of CT for the complete colonoscopy group were 68.3% and 97.0%, while the positive and negative predictive values were 22.2% and 98.7%, respectively. In both groups, the mean maximum dimension of the concurrent cancers identified in the CT-negative cases was shorter than in the CT-positive cases (incomplete group: P = 0.02; complete group: P < 0.01) Topographical proximity to synchronous cancers was identified as a risk factor for missed diagnosis (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: CT has limited sensitivity in detecting SCRCs in patients receiving incomplete colonoscopy. Patients with risk factors and negative CT results should be closely examined and monitored.
Entities:
Keywords:
Colonoscopy; Computed tomography; Synchronous colorectal cancer
Authors: Alfred King-Yin Lam; Robert Carmichael; Petra Gertraud Buettner; Vinod Gopalan; Yik-Hong Ho; Simon Siu Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Jordan H Wolff; Anna Rubin; Jeffrey D Potter; Waymon Lattimore; Murray B Resnick; Brian L Murphy; Steven F Moss Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2008 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: D R McArthur; H Mehrzad; R Patel; J Dadds; A Pallan; S S Karandikar; S Roy-Choudhury Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Tom Offermans; F Jeroen Vogelaar; Michel Aquarius; Maryska L G Janssen-Heijnen; Petra C G Simons Journal: Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Date: 2018-02-12