Literature DB >> 25684646

Random biopsy in colposcopy-negative quadrant is not effective in women with positive colposcopy in practice.

Yan Song1, Yu-Qian Zhao2, Xun Zhang3, Xiao-Yang Liu1, Ling Li1, Qin-Jing Pan1, Gui-Hua Shen1, Fang-Hui Zhao2, Feng Chen2, Wen Chen4, You-Lin Qiao2.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the efficacy of random biopsy in diagnosing those high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or carcinomas (HSIL+) missed by colposcopy-directed biopsy, and to identify the scenarios of cervical cancer screening when random biopsy is necessary. PATIENTS/
INTERVENTIONS: Data from 1997 women who participated in the Shanxi Province Cervical Cancer Screening Study I (SPOCCS I) were reviewed. Each woman received human papillomavirus (HPV) testing with the second-generation hybrid capture, liquid-based cytology, four-quadrant biopsy and endocervical curettage. The final diagnosis was based on the most severe pathological result obtained. The efficacy of random biopsy and colposcopy-directed biopsy was evaluated on the basis of the final pathological results.
RESULTS: For women with severe cytological abnormalities (HSIL+) and negative colposcopy, the yield of HSIL+ diagnosed by random biopsy was 25%. On the other hand, the yield of HSIL+ diagnosed by random biopsies in the negative quadrant was no more than 4% when the colposcopy was positive, regardless of the cytological findings. For women with negative HPV, no HSIL+ was found by random biopsy. For women with severe cytological abnormalities (HSIL+) and positive HPV, the yield of HSIL+ diagnosed by random biopsy was 35% when colposcopy was negative. For women with low-grade intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and positive HPV, the yield of HSIL+ diagnosed by random biopsy was 12.5% when colposcopy was negative.
CONCLUSION: Random biopsy is not effective in the negative quadrant in women with positive colposcopy, but should be performed in women with cytological HSIL+ but negative colposcopy, or in those with cytological LSIL or HGSL+ and positive HPV but negative colposcopy.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Colposcopic-directed biopsy; Colposcopy; Random biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25684646     DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  2 in total

1.  A retrospective analysis of the utility of endocervical curettage in screening population.

Authors:  Yan Song; Yu-Qian Zhao; Ling Li; Qin-Jin Pan; Nan Li; Fang-Hui Zhao; Wen Chen; Xun Zhang; You-Lin Qiao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-25

2.  Pooled analysis on the necessity of random 4-quadrant cervical biopsies and endocervical curettage in women with positive screening but negative colposcopy.

Authors:  Shang-Ying Hu; Wen-Hua Zhang; Shu-Min Li; Nan Li; Man-Ni Huang; Qin-Jing Pan; Xun Zhang; Ying Han; Fang-Hui Zhao; Wen Chen; You-Lin Qiao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.