Literature DB >> 25684643

Efficacy of non-invasive mechanical ventilation in the general ward in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admitted for hypercapnic acute respiratory failure and pH < 7.35: a feasibility pilot study.

S Fiorino1, L Bacchi-Reggiani2, E Detotto1, M Battilana1, E Borghi1, C Denitto1, C Dickmans1, B Facchini1, R Moretti1, S Parini1, M Testi1, A Zamboni1, A Cuppini1, L Pisani3, S Nava3.   

Abstract

AIM: To date non-invasive (NIV) mechanical ventilation use is not recommended in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) and pH < 7.30 outside a 'protected environment'. We assessed NIV efficacy and feasibility in improving arterial blood gases (ABG) and in-hospital outcome in patients with ARF and severe respiratory acidosis (RA) admitted to an experienced rural medical ward.
METHODS: This paper is a prospective pilot cohort study conducted in the General Medicine Ward of Budrio's District Hospital. Two hundred and seventy-two patients with ARF were admitted to our Department, 112, meeting predefined inclusion criteria (pH < 7.35, PaCO2 > 45 mmHg). Patients were divided according to the severity of acidosis into: group A (pH < 7.26), group B (7.26 ≤ pH < 7.30) and group C (7.30 ≤ pH < 7.35). ABG were assessed at admission, at 2-6 h, 24 h, 48 h and at discharge.
RESULTS: Group A included 55 patients (24 men, mean age: 80.8 ± 8.3 years), group B 31 (12 men, mean age: 80.3 ± 9.4 years) and group C 26 (15 men, mean age: 78.6 ± 9.9 years). ABG improved within the first hours in 92/112 (82%) patients, who were all successfully discharged. Eighteen percent (20/112) of the patients died during the hospital stay, no significant difference emerged in mortality rate (MR) within the groups (23%, 16% and 8%, for groups A, B and C, respectively) and between patients with or without pneumonia: 8/29 (27%) versus 12/83 (14%). On multivariable analysis, only age and Glasgow Coma Scale had an impact on the clinical outcome.
CONCLUSION: In a non-'highly protected' environment such as an experienced medical ward of a rural hospital, NIV is effective not only in patients with mild, but also with severe forms of RA. MR did not vary according to the level of initial pH.
© 2015 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute respiratory failure; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; non-invasive mechanical ventilation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25684643     DOI: 10.1111/imj.12726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med J        ISSN: 1444-0903            Impact factor:   2.048


  10 in total

1.  Is sedation safe and beneficial in patients receiving NIV? No.

Authors:  Giorgio Conti; Nicholas S Hill; Stefano Nava
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Natural history and risk stratification of patients undergoing non-invasive ventilation in a non-ICU setting for severe COPD exacerbations.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Sainaghi; Davide Colombo; Azzurra Re; Mattia Bellan; Daniele Sola; Piero Emilio Balbo; Mauro Campanini; Francesco Della Corte; Paolo Navalesi; Mario Pirisi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  The Role of Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients with "Do Not Intubate" Order in the Emergency Setting.

Authors:  Marta Vilaça; Irene Aragão; Teresa Cardoso; Cláudia Dias; Glória Cabral-Campello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Trends in assisted ventilation and outcome for obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. A nationwide study.

Authors:  Anne Pernille Toft-Petersen; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Ulla Møller Weinreich; Bodil Steen Rasmussen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Noninvasive ventilation utilization in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Results of a national survey.

Authors:  Mohammed Dhafer AlAhmari; Hajed Al-Otaibi; Hatem Qutub; Ibrahim AlBalawi; Abdullah Alqahtani; Bandar Almasoudi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.219

6.  Early prediction of noninvasive ventilation failure in COPD patients: derivation, internal validation, and external validation of a simple risk score.

Authors:  Jun Duan; Shengyu Wang; Ping Liu; Xiaoli Han; Yao Tian; Fan Gao; Jing Zhou; Junhuan Mou; Qian Qin; Jingrong Yu; Linfu Bai; Lintong Zhou; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.925

7.  A scoring system derived from electronic health records to identify patients at high risk for noninvasive ventilation failure.

Authors:  Mihaela S Stefan; Aruna Priya; Penelope S Pekow; Jay S Steingrub; Nicholas S Hill; Tara Lagu; Karthik Raghunathan; Anusha G Bhat; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.317

Review 8.  Highlights from the Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation 2020 Conference.

Authors:  Adelaide Withers; Tiffany Choi Ching Man; Rebecca D'Cruz; Heder de Vries; Christoph Fisser; Carla Ribeiro; Neeraj Shah; Marine Van Hollebecke; Bettine A H Vosse; Leo Heunks; Maxime Patout
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2021-02-08

9.  Head-To-Head Comparison of Treatment Failure and Costs among COPD Patients Who Used Noninvasive Ventilation in the Ward versus in the ICU: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yueling Hong; Qiao Liu; Linfu Bai; Lei Jiang; Xiaoli Han; Shicong Huang; Wenhui Hu; Jun Duan; Chuanbo Liu
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.409

10.  Ward-Based Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure Unrelated to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Bandar M Faqihi; Dhruv Parekh; Samuel P Trethewey; Julien Morlet; Rahul Mukherjee; Alice M Turner
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.409

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.