Literature DB >> 25684605

Impact of carbamylation on three different methods, HPLC, capillary electrophoresis and TINIA of measuring HbA1c levels in patients with kidney disease.

Ramona C Dolscheid-Pommerich1, Sonja Kirchner2, Carola Weigel2, Lars Eichhorn3, Rupert Conrad4, Birgit Stoffel-Wagner2, Berndt Zur2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Aim of this study was to investigate whether established IFCC traceable routine measurements of HbA1c levels in patients with kidney diseases result in comparable and valid results. Additionally, the influence of carbamylation as a marker of uremia on the measurement methods was assessed.
METHODS: We compared three different measurement methods (high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), capillary electrophoresis and turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (TINIA)) based on 407 nephrology samples for HbA1c determination with specific analysis of the threshold areas where different HbA1c measurements could result in different diagnoses (diabetes mellitus vs prediabetes and prediabetes vs non-diabetes). Indirectly, a potential effect of carbamylated hemoglobin was assessed based on determination of BUN levels in serum.
RESULTS: In nephrological samples, we were able to show that three different measurement methods provide similar results regarding HbA1c in routine diagnostics. Our results show that with BUN concentrations <80 mg/dl and ≥80 mg/dl, similar HbA1c levels were determined, independent of measurement method. CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: While routine measurements follow IFCC standards, many interfering factors remain which can influence HbA1c determination, e.g. carbamylation of proteins. As kidney disease is the most common complication in patients with diabetes mellitus, interference in the measurement of HbA1c due to carbamylated proteins as markers of uremia must be recognized and if necessary corrected. We found not only a weak influence of carbamylation on all methods of HbA1c determination, but also that, in nephrological samples, the three different measurement methods provided similar results regarding HbA1c in routine diagnostics.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbamylation; Diabetes mellitus; HbA1c; Kidney disease; Nephrology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25684605     DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.01.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract        ISSN: 0168-8227            Impact factor:   5.602


  3 in total

Review 1.  Haemoglobin A1c or Glycated Albumin for Diagnosis and Monitoring Diabetes: An African Perspective.

Authors:  J A George; R T Erasmus
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2018-05-03

2.  Labile glycated haemoglobin and carbamylated haemoglobin are still critical points for HbA1c measurement.

Authors:  Aurore Desmons; Stéphane Jaisson; Nathalie Leroy; Philippe Gillery; Emmanuelle Guillard
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

3.  Evaluation of Bio-Rad D-100 HbA1c analyzer against Tosoh G8 and Menarini HA-8180V.

Authors:  José María Maesa; Patricia Fernández-Riejos; Catalina Sánchez Mora; María de Toro; Paloma Menéndez Valladares; Concepción González-Rodriguez
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2016-05-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.