Literature DB >> 25684281

Extended culture of macrophages from different sources and maturation results in a common M2 phenotype.

Lisa M Chamberlain1,2, Dolly Holt-Casper3, Mercedes Gonzalez-Juarrero1,4, David W Grainger2,3.   

Abstract

Inflammatory responses to biomaterials heavily influence the environment surrounding implanted devices, often producing foreign-body reactions. The macrophage is a key immunomodulatory cell type consistently associated with implanted biomaterials and routinely used in short-term in vitro cell studies of biomaterials aiming to reproduce host responses. Inconsistencies within these studies, including differently sourced cells, different durations of culture, and assessment of different activation markers, lead to many conflicting results in vitro that confound consistency and conclusions. We hypothesize that different experimentally popular monocyte-macrophage cell types have intrinsic in vitro culture-specific differences that yield conflicting results. Recent studies demonstrate changes in cultured macrophage cytokine expression over time, leading to the hypothesis that changes in macrophage phenotype also occur in response to extended culture. Here, macrophage cells of different transformed and primary-derived origins were cultured for 21 days on model polymer biomaterials. Cell type-based differences in morphology and cytokine/chemokine expression as well as changes in cell surface biomarkers associated with differentiation stage, activation state, and adhesion were compared. Results reflect consistent macrophage development toward an M2 phenotype via up-regulation of the macrophage mannose receptor for all cell types following 21-day extended culture. Significantly, implanted biomaterials experiencing the foreign-body response and encapsulation in vivo often elicit a shift toward an analogous M2 macrophage phenotype. In vitro "default" of macrophage cultures, regardless of lineage, to this M2 state in the presence of biomaterials at long culture periods is not recognized, but has important implications to in vitro modeling of in vivo host response.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biocompatibility; cell activation; cell culture; cytokine; foreign-body response; in vitro; inflammatory phenotype

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25684281      PMCID: PMC4520783          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  61 in total

Review 1.  New vistas on macrophage differentiation and activation.

Authors:  Alberto Mantovani; Antonio Sica; Massimo Locati
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Rho GTPase protein expression and activation in murine monocytes/macrophages is not modulated by model biomaterial surfaces in serum-containing in vitro cultures.

Authors:  M L Godek; J A Sampson; N L Duchsherer; Q McElwee; D W Grainger
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.517

3.  Modulating fibroblast adhesion, spreading, and proliferation using self-assembled monolayer films of alkylthiolates on gold.

Authors:  K B McClary; T Ugarova; D W Grainger
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-06-05

4.  Anodic oxidation and hydrothermal treatment of commercially pure titanium surfaces increases expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in the adherent macrophage cell line J774A.1.

Authors:  J Takebe; S Ito; C M Champagne; L F Cooper; K Ishibashi
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Differential susceptibility of macrophage cell lines to Bacillus anthracis-Vollum 1B.

Authors:  B W Gutting; K S Gaske; A S Schilling; A F Slaterbeck; L Sobota; R S Mackie; T L Buhr
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Reactive oxygen species inhibited by titanium oxide coatings.

Authors:  Richard Suzuki; Julie Muyco; Joanna McKittrick; John A Frangos
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 4.396

7.  Morphology and growth of murine cell lines on model biomaterials.

Authors:  Marisha L Godek; Nichole L Duchsherer; Quinn McElwee; David W Grainger
Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum       Date:  2004

8.  Tissue response and in vivo degradation of selected polyhydroxyacids: polylactides (PLA), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHB/VA).

Authors:  S Gogolewski; M Jovanovic; S M Perren; J G Dillon; M K Hughes
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1993-09

9.  Spectrum and mechanisms of inflammasome activation by chitosan.

Authors:  Chelsea L Bueter; Chrono K Lee; Jennifer P Wang; Gary R Ostroff; Charles A Specht; Stuart M Levitz
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  Cytocompatibility of a free machining titanium alloy containing lanthanum.

Authors:  Frank Feyerabend; Carsten Siemers; Regine Willumeit; Joachim Rösler
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 4.396

View more
  11 in total

1.  One-pot preparation of labelled mannan-peptide conjugate, model for immune cell processing.

Authors:  Pavol Farkaš; Alžbeta Čížová; Peter Bystrický; Lucia Paulovičová; Ema Paulovičová; Slavomír Bystrický
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.916

2.  Surface Modification of Polymeric Nanoparticles with M2pep Peptide for Drug Delivery to Tumor-Associated Macrophages.

Authors:  Liang Pang; Yihua Pei; Gozde Uzunalli; Hyesun Hyun; L Tiffany Lyle; Yoon Yeo
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  In Vitro and In Vivo Models for Assessing the Host Response to Biomaterials.

Authors:  Leila S Saleh; Stephanie J Bryant
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Dis Models       Date:  2018-05-18

4.  Genetic Modification of Primary Human Myeloid Cells to Study Cell Migration, Activation, and Organelle Dynamics.

Authors:  Daniel Greiner; Tiana M Scott; Gregory S Olson; Alan Aderem; Minna Roh-Johnson; Jarrod S Johnson
Journal:  Curr Protoc       Date:  2022-08

5.  Mouse pancreatic islet macrophages use locally released ATP to monitor beta cell activity.

Authors:  Jonathan R Weitz; Madina Makhmutova; Joana Almaça; Julia Stertmann; Kristie Aamodt; Marcela Brissova; Stephan Speier; Rayner Rodriguez-Diaz; Alejandro Caicedo
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Differentiated macrophages acquire a pro-inflammatory and cell death-resistant phenotype due to increasing XIAP and p38-mediated inhibition of RipK1.

Authors:  Dikchha Rijal; Ardeshir Ariana; Andrew Wight; Kwangsin Kim; Norah A Alturki; Zoya Aamir; Emmanuelle S Ametepe; Robert G Korneluk; Christopher Tiedje; Manoj B Menon; Matthias Gaestel; Scott McComb; Subash Sad
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Mannosylated Cationic Copolymers for Gene Delivery to Macrophages.

Authors:  Anton V Lopukhov; Zigang Yang; Matthew J Haney; Tatiana K Bronich; Marina Sokolsky-Papkov; Elena V Batrakova; Natalia L Klyachko; Alexander V Kabanov
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.979

8.  Novel Markers to Delineate Murine M1 and M2 Macrophages.

Authors:  Kyle A Jablonski; Stephanie A Amici; Lindsay M Webb; Juan de Dios Ruiz-Rosado; Phillip G Popovich; Santiago Partida-Sanchez; Mireia Guerau-de-Arellano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Stevioside Activates AMPK to Suppress Inflammation in Macrophages and Protects Mice from LPS-Induced Lethal Shock.

Authors:  Fuyao Wei; Hong Zhu; Na Li; Chunlei Yu; Zhenbo Song; Shuyue Wang; Ying Sun; Lihua Zheng; Guannan Wang; Yanxin Huang; Yongli Bao; Luguo Sun
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Peripheral mechanisms of arthritic pain: A proposal to leverage large animals for in vitro studies.

Authors:  Sampurna Chakrabarti; Minji Ai; Frances M D Henson; Ewan St John Smith
Journal:  Neurobiol Pain       Date:  2020-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.