Christine M McInnis1, Diana Wang2, Danielle Gianferante1, Luke Hanlin1, Xuejie Chen1, Myriam V Thoma1, Nicolas Rohleder3. 1. Department of Psychology and Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States. 2. Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States. 3. Department of Psychology and Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States. Electronic address: rohleder@brandeis.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Acute stress induces increases in plasma inflammatory mediators, which do not habituate to repeated stress. Inflammation is a risk factor for age-related illnesses, highlighting the need to understand factors controlling inflammation. No studies have examined changes in pro- and anti-inflammatory gene expression in response to repeated acute stress in humans. METHODS: RNA was isolated from peripheral blood before, 30 and 120min after exposure of n=32 healthy human participants to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) on two days. Gene expression of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, nuclear factor (NF)-κB and IκB was measured repeatedly on both days. We further assessed leukocyte numbers, plasma IL-6, and salivary cortisol. RESULTS: Stress induced IL-6 (F=44.7; p<0.001) and cortisol responses (F=18.6; p<0.001). Cortisol responses habituated (F=5.1, p=0.003), but IL-6 responses did not (n.s.). All genes increased in response to initial stress (IL-6: F=3.8; p=0.029; IL-1β: F=7.1; p=0.008; NF-κB: F=5.1; p=0.009; IκB: F=4.7; p=0.013) and showed habituation to repeated stress (IL-6: t=2.3; p=0.03; IL-1β: t=3.9; p=0.001; NF-κB: t=2.1; p=0.041; IκB: t=3.1; p=0.005). Day 1 responses of IL-1β and IκB were not explained by changes in leukocyte populations, but IL-6 and NF-κB, as well as most day 2 changes were not independent of leukocyte populations. CONCLUSIONS: Stress response and habituation of pro- and anti-inflammatory gene expression as found here might indicate that even on an intracellular level, inflammatory responses to acute stress are adaptive in that they respond to initial, but habituate to repeated, similar stress. Future studies will need to test whether non-habituation is predictive of disease.
INTRODUCTION: Acute stress induces increases in plasma inflammatory mediators, which do not habituate to repeated stress. Inflammation is a risk factor for age-related illnesses, highlighting the need to understand factors controlling inflammation. No studies have examined changes in pro- and anti-inflammatory gene expression in response to repeated acute stress in humans. METHODS: RNA was isolated from peripheral blood before, 30 and 120min after exposure of n=32 healthy humanparticipants to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) on two days. Gene expression of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, nuclear factor (NF)-κB and IκB was measured repeatedly on both days. We further assessed leukocyte numbers, plasma IL-6, and salivary cortisol. RESULTS: Stress induced IL-6 (F=44.7; p<0.001) and cortisol responses (F=18.6; p<0.001). Cortisol responses habituated (F=5.1, p=0.003), but IL-6 responses did not (n.s.). All genes increased in response to initial stress (IL-6: F=3.8; p=0.029; IL-1β: F=7.1; p=0.008; NF-κB: F=5.1; p=0.009; IκB: F=4.7; p=0.013) and showed habituation to repeated stress (IL-6: t=2.3; p=0.03; IL-1β: t=3.9; p=0.001; NF-κB: t=2.1; p=0.041; IκB: t=3.1; p=0.005). Day 1 responses of IL-1β and IκB were not explained by changes in leukocyte populations, but IL-6 and NF-κB, as well as most day 2 changes were not independent of leukocyte populations. CONCLUSIONS: Stress response and habituation of pro- and anti-inflammatory gene expression as found here might indicate that even on an intracellular level, inflammatory responses to acute stress are adaptive in that they respond to initial, but habituate to repeated, similar stress. Future studies will need to test whether non-habituation is predictive of disease.
Authors: Jenny Tung; Luis B Barreiro; Zachary P Johnson; Kasper D Hansen; Vasiliki Michopoulos; Donna Toufexis; Katelyn Michelini; Mark E Wilson; Yoav Gilad Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jutta M Wolf; Nicolas Rohleder; Angelika Bierhaus; Peter P Nawroth; Clemens Kirschbaum Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2008-09-26 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Anthony S Zannas; Jennifer L Gordon; Alan L Hinderliter; Susan S Girdler; David R Rubinow Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Yuliya I Kuras; Naomi Assaf; Myriam V Thoma; Danielle Gianferante; Luke Hanlin; Xuejie Chen; Alexander Fiksdal; Nicolas Rohleder Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: M Dillwyn Bartholomeusz; Philip S Bolton; Robin Callister; Virginia Skinner; Deborah Hodgson Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2017-05-06
Authors: Till S Böbel; Sascha B Hackl; Dominik Langgartner; Marc N Jarczok; Nicolas Rohleder; Graham A Rook; Christopher A Lowry; Harald Gündel; Christiane Waller; Stefan O Reber Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 11.205