PURPOSE: To develop a computerized prescreening procedure for the identification of possible/probably Hospital Admissions potential Related to Medications (HARMs). METHOD: Pairs of drugs and reasons for hospitalization (generated automatically from the PHARMO record linkage database by using two data mining techniques) were assessed manually to determine whether they represented pharmacologically plausible adverse drug events (PP-ADEs). Two crude samples of these PP-ADEs (from 2005 and 2008) were examined manually to establish causality and preventability on the basis of hospital discharge letters plus medication dispensing data. The results were used to calculate the positive predictive value (PPV) of the crude causality PP-ADEs, the net percentage of possible/probably HARMs, and their potential preventability. RESULTS: Data mining by Gamma Poisson Shrinkage and trend analysis produced 1330 and 2941 significant drug-event pairs, respectively. After manual assessment, 307 different PP-ADEs remained. The annual prevalence of these PP-ADEs was stable at approximately 8% throughout 2000-2009. Manual assessment of two samples of crude PP-ADEs showed that their causality PPV was 53.7% (95%CI: 52.7%-54.7%) in 2005 and 47.9% (95%CI: 46.9%-49.0%) in 2008. The net contribution of possible/probably HARMs to all acute admissions was 4.6% (95%CI: 4.5%-4.8%) in 2005 and 3.9% (95%CI: 3.8%-4.0%) in 2008. The potential preventability of all possible/probably HARMs in the two samples was 19.3% (95%CI: 18.5-20.1). CONCLUSION: Automated pre-selection of PP-ADEs is an efficient way to monitor crude trends. Further validation and manual assessment of the automatically selected hospitalizations is necessary to get a more detailed and precise picture.
PURPOSE: To develop a computerized prescreening procedure for the identification of possible/probably Hospital Admissions potential Related to Medications (HARMs). METHOD: Pairs of drugs and reasons for hospitalization (generated automatically from the PHARMO record linkage database by using two data mining techniques) were assessed manually to determine whether they represented pharmacologically plausible adverse drug events (PP-ADEs). Two crude samples of these PP-ADEs (from 2005 and 2008) were examined manually to establish causality and preventability on the basis of hospital discharge letters plus medication dispensing data. The results were used to calculate the positive predictive value (PPV) of the crude causality PP-ADEs, the net percentage of possible/probably HARMs, and their potential preventability. RESULTS: Data mining by Gamma Poisson Shrinkage and trend analysis produced 1330 and 2941 significant drug-event pairs, respectively. After manual assessment, 307 different PP-ADEs remained. The annual prevalence of these PP-ADEs was stable at approximately 8% throughout 2000-2009. Manual assessment of two samples of crude PP-ADEs showed that their causality PPV was 53.7% (95%CI: 52.7%-54.7%) in 2005 and 47.9% (95%CI: 46.9%-49.0%) in 2008. The net contribution of possible/probably HARMs to all acute admissions was 4.6% (95%CI: 4.5%-4.8%) in 2005 and 3.9% (95%CI: 3.8%-4.0%) in 2008. The potential preventability of all possible/probably HARMs in the two samples was 19.3% (95%CI: 18.5-20.1). CONCLUSION: Automated pre-selection of PP-ADEs is an efficient way to monitor crude trends. Further validation and manual assessment of the automatically selected hospitalizations is necessary to get a more detailed and precise picture.
Authors: Beatrijs Mertens; Julie Hias; Laura Hellemans; Karolien Walgraeve; Isabel Spriet; Jos Tournoy; Lorenz Roger Van der Linden Journal: Eur Geriatr Med Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 1.710
Authors: A E M J H Linkens; V Milosevic; P H M van der Kuy; V H Damen-Hendriks; C Mestres Gonzalvo; K P G M Hurkens Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2020-05-30
Authors: Aimée E M J H Linkens; Vanja Milosevic; Noémi van Nie; Anne Zwietering; Peter W de Leeuw; Marjan van den Akker; Jos M G A Schols; Silvia M A A Evers; Carlota Mestres Gonzalvo; Bjorn Winkens; Bob P A van de Loo; Louis de Wolf; Lucretia Peeters; Monique de Ree; Bart Spaetgens; Kim P G M Hurkens; Hugo M van der Kuy Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Bastiaan T G M Sallevelt; Nikki M F Noorda; Wivien L Langendijk; Toine C G Egberts; Eugène P van Puijenbroek; Ingeborg Wilting; Wilma Knol Journal: Eur Geriatr Med Date: 2022-05-30 Impact factor: 3.269
Authors: Fouzia Lghoul-Oulad Saïd; Karin Hek; Linda E Flinterman; Ron Mc Herings; Margaretha F Warlé-van Herwaarden; Sandra de Bie; Vera E Valkhoff; Jelmer Alsma; Mees Mosseveld; Ann M Vanrolleghem; Bruno Hch Stricker; Miriam Cjm Sturkenboom; Peter Agm De Smet; Patricia Mla van den Bemt Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 2.890