Multicenter, prospective trial of white-light imaging alone versus white-light imaging followed by magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging for the real-time imaging and diagnosis of invasion depth in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) has been used to estimate the invasion depth of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC), but the real diagnostic power of ME-NBI remains unclear because of few prospective studies.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether ME-NBI adds additional information to white-light imaging (WLI) for the diagnosis of invasion depth of SESCC.
DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective trial using real-time imaging and diagnosis.
SETTING: Seven Japanese institutions. PATIENTS: Fifty-five patients with SESCC were enrolled from June 2011 to October 2013, and the results for 49 lesions were analyzed.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent primary WLI followed by ME-NBI, and reports of primary WLI (WLI alone) were completed before secondary ME-NBI (WLI followed by ME-NBI). To standardize diagnosis among examiners, this trial was started after achievement of a mean κ value≥.6 among 11 participating endoscopists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Diagnosis of invasion depth by each tool was divided into cancer limited to the epithelium and the lamina propria mucosa and cancer invading beyond the muscularis mucosae (≥T1a-MM) and then collated with the final pathologic diagnosis by an independent pathologist blinded to the clinical data.
RESULTS: The accuracy of invasion depth in WLI alone and WLI followed by ME-NBI was 71.4% and 65.3% (P=.375), respectively. Sensitivity for ≥T1a-MM was 61.1% for both groups (P=1.000), and specificity for ≥T1a-MM was 77.4% for WLI alone and 67.7% for WLI followed by ME-NBI (P=.375). LIMITATION: Open-label trial.
CONCLUSIONS: ME-NBI showed no additional benefit to WLI for diagnosis of invasion depth of SESCC. (University Hospital Network Clinical Trials Registry number: UMIN000005632.).