Literature DB >> 25682693

The surprise-attention link: a review.

Gernot Horstmann1.   

Abstract

The surprise-attention hypothesis assumes a strong connection between surprise-expectancy discrepant events-and attention. Attention is easily engaged with surprising events, leading to long dwell times. In addition, if the expectancy discrepancy can be determined on the basis of simple, preattentively available information, attention can be captured by the surprising stimulus. This review summarizes different lines of research relevant to the proposed surprise-attention link: shifts of attention as indexed by accuracy gains and efficiency gains, validity effects, shifts of gaze, discrepancies in natural scenes, surprise-induced blindness, and action interruption. It is argued that there is convergent evidence for the surprise-attention link in general, and for the particular hypothesis that the underlying mechanism constantly tests expectancies on different levels of representation. Evidence also converges on a latency of an attentional engagement of nearly 400 ms. This seems to be a unique feature of surprise capture that also questions the validity of models proposing that saliency is an early automatic attractor of attention. Mechanisms possibly underlying the surprise-attention link are discussed.
© 2015 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; expectation; novelty; prediction; singleton; surprise

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25682693     DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  16 in total

1.  Surprising depth cue captures attention in visual search.

Authors:  Thorsten Plewan; Gerhard Rinkenauer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

Review 2.  Towards real-world generalizability of a circuit for action-stopping.

Authors:  Ricci Hannah; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Task-Irrelevant Expectation Violations in Sequential Manual Actions: Evidence for a "Check-after-Surprise" Mode of Visual Attention and Eye-Hand Decoupling.

Authors:  Rebecca M Foerster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-23

4.  On the Maintenance of Expectations in Major Depression - Investigating a Neglected Phenomenon.

Authors:  Tobias Kube; Winfried Rief; Julia A Glombiewski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-18

5.  Evidence for Startle Effects due to Externally Induced Lower Limb Movements: Implications in Neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Juan M Castellote; Markus Kofler; Andreas Mayr; Leopold Saltuari
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  The role of unique color changes and singletons in attention capture.

Authors:  Adrian von Mühlenen; Markus Conci
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Can Psychological Expectation Models Be Adapted for Placebo Research?

Authors:  Winfried Rief; Keith J Petrie
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-28

8.  Saliency Detection as a Reactive Process: Unexpected Sensory Events Evoke Corticomuscular Coupling.

Authors:  Giacomo Novembre; Vijay M Pawar; Rory J Bufacchi; Marina Kilintari; Mandayam Srinivasan; John C Rothwell; Patrick Haggard; Gian Domenico Iannetti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  EEG Differentiation Analysis and Stimulus Set Meaningfulness.

Authors:  Armand Mensen; William Marshall; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-06

10.  Attentional efficiency does not explain the mental state × domain effect.

Authors:  Joseph Sweetman; George A Newman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.