Literature DB >> 25682552

Dobutamine stress echocardiography during follow-up surveillance in heart transplant patients: Diagnostic accuracy and predictors of outcomes.

Srisakul Chirakarnjanakorn1, Randall C Starling2, Zoran B Popović2, Brian P Griffin3, Milind Y Desai4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), a major cause of graft failure and mortality at >3 years after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), is commonly evaluated using dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). We sought to study: (a) the incidence of positive results and diagnostic accuracy of DSE; and (b) the predictors of adverse outcomes in OHT patients.
METHODS: We studied 497 consecutive patients (63 ± 10 years, 78% men) with OHT who had undergone DSE as part of routine surveillance at our center between 1998 and 2013. Every DSE and coronary angiogram performed during follow-up was reviewed. CAV was regraded according to the 2010 recommendations of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Composite events (death, coronary revascularization, myocardial infarction and retransplantation) were recorded.
RESULTS: There were 1,243 DSE studies performed during a median of 8.7 (6.2 to 11.9) years after transplantation. Only 22 studies (1.8%) were positive, 978 (78.7%) were negative and 243 (19.5%) were non-diagnostic (sub-maximal heart rate response) for ischemia. Among 497 patients, only 20 (4%) had at least one positive DSE study. There were 310 diagnostic DSEs with coronary angiograms performed within 1 year of one another other. In this subgroup, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of DSE were 7%, 98%, 82% and 41%, respectively, to detect any CAV, and 28%, 98%, 71% and 89% to detect CAV Grades 2 or 3, respectively. There were no deaths during DSE. At 5.6 ± 3.6 years after DSE, there were 201 (40%) events. Degree of CAV (and not DSE-based ischemia, p = 0.3) independently predicted outcomes (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of a positive result is very low in OHT patients undergoing surveillance DSE. DSE is insufficiently sensitive for detection of early CAV. Degree of CAV and not DSE-based ischemia independently predicted outcomes.
Copyright © 2015 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; cardiac allograft vasculopathy; dobutamine stress echocardiography; heart transplantation; outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25682552     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  12 in total

1.  Should positron emission tomography be the standard of care for non-invasive surveillance following cardiac transplantation?

Authors:  Robert J H Miller; Jon A Kobashigawa; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  New developments for the detection and treatment of cardiac vasculopathy.

Authors:  Kevin J Clerkin; Ziad A Ali; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantification as non-invasive indicator of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Authors:  Paco E Bravo; Brian A Bergmark; Tomas Vita; Viviany R Taqueti; Ankur Gupta; Sara Seidelmann; Thomas E Christensen; Michael T Osborne; Nishant R Shah; Nina Ghosh; Jon Hainer; Courtney F Bibbo; Meagan Harrington; Fred Costantino; Mandeep R Mehra; Sharmila Dorbala; Ron Blankstein; Akshay Desai; Lynne Stevenson; Michael M Givertz; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy by multi-layer left ventricular longitudinal strain in heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  C Sciaccaluga; G E Mandoli; N Sisti; M B Natali; A Ibrahim; D Menci; A D'Errico; G Donati; G Benfari; S Valente; S Bernazzali; M Maccherini; S Mondillo; M Cameli; M Focardi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  How to Approach the Assessment of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in the Modern Era: Review of Invasive Imaging Modalities.

Authors:  Ali Javaheri; Naveen Saha; Scott M Lilly
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2016-04

6.  Dobutamine stress echocardiography is inadequate to detect early cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Authors:  Kevin J Clerkin; Maryjane A Farr; Susan W Restaino; Ziad A Ali; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Clinical Utility of SPECT in the Heart Transplant Population: Analysis From a Single Large-volume Center.

Authors:  Jack Aguilar; Robert J H Miller; Yuka Otaki; Balaji Tamarappoo; Sean Hayes; John Friedman; Piotr J Slomka; Louise E J Thomson; Michelle Kittleson; Jignesh K Patel; Jon A Kobashigawa; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 5.385

8.  Safety and prognostic value of regadenoson stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Felipe Kazmirczak; Prabhjot S Nijjar; Lei Zhang; Andrew Hughes; Ko-Hsuan Amy Chen; Osama Okasha; Cindy M Martin; Mehmet Akçakaya; Afshin Farzaneh-Far; Chetan Shenoy
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Pharmacological vs Exercise Stress Echocardiography for Detection of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy.

Authors:  Milena A Gebska; Noah N Williford; Angela J Schadler; Carolyn Laxson; Paulino Alvarez; Alexandros Briasoulis; Linda M Cadaret; Ily Kristine T Yumul-Non; Richard E Kerber; Robert M Weiss
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-01-08

Review 10.  Evaluation of cardiac allograft vasculopathy by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Attila Feher; Albert J Sinusas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.