Literature DB >> 25682444

Determinants of prenatal health care utilisation by low-risk women: a prospective cohort study.

Esther I Feijen-de Jong1, Danielle E M C Jansen2, Frank Baarveld3, Agatha W Boerleider4, Evelien Spelten5, François Schellevis6, Sijmen A Reijneveld7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prenatal health care is pivotal in providing adequate prevention and care to pregnant women. AIM: We examined the determinants of inadequate prenatal health care utilisation by low-risk women in primary midwifery-led care in the Netherlands.
METHODS: We used longitudinal data from the population-based DELIVER study with 20 midwifery practices across the Netherlands in 2009 and 2010 as the experimental setting. The participants were 3070 pregnant women starting pregnancy care in primary midwifery care.
FINDINGS: We collected patient-reported data on potential determinants of prenatal care utilisation derived from the Andersen model. Prenatal health care utilisation was measured by a revised version of the Kotelchuck Index, which measures a combination of care entry and number of visits. Low-risk pregnant women (not referred during pregnancy) were more likely to use prenatal care inadequately if they intended to deliver at a hospital, if they did not use folic acid adequately periconceptionally, or if they were exposed to cigarette smoke during pregnancy. Among those who were referred to secondary care, women reporting a chronic illnesses or disabilities, and women who did not use folic acid periconceptionally were more likely to make inadequate use of prenatal care.
CONCLUSION: Inadequate prenatal health care use in primary midwifery care is more likely in specific groups, and the risk groups differ when women are referred to secondary care. The findings suggest routes that can target interventions to women who are at risk of not adequately using prenatal prevention and care services.
Copyright © 2015 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health care utilisation; Midwifery; Obstetrics; Pregnancy; Public health

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25682444     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  4 in total

1.  Women who smoke during pregnancy are more likely to be referred to an obstetrician during pregnancy and birth: results from a cohort study.

Authors:  S Weiland; L L Peters; M Y Berger; J J H M Erwich; D E M C Jansen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Healthcare-seeking behavior among pregnant women in the Chinese hierarchical medical system: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Guihao Liu; Yunlian Xue; Zhenzhu Qian; Liuna Yang; Yunbin Yang; Qingshan Geng; Xin Wang
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2019-08-19

3.  Effects of customer self-audit on the quality of maternity care in Tabriz: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kamal Gholipour; Jafar Sadegh Tabrizi; Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi; Shabnam Iezadi; Ahmad Mardi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Perinatal outcomes of frequent attendance in midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Lisanne A Gitsels; Angelo Hooker; Paula Scholing; Linda Martin; Esther I Feijen-de Jong
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.