Literature DB >> 25682191

Clinical outcome in pleomorphic lobular carcinoma: a case-control study with comparison to classic invasive lobular carcinoma.

Sonia Narendra1, Sarah M Jenkins2, Andras Khoor3, Aziza Nassar3.   

Abstract

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma (PLC), a variant of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is described as an aggressive tumor with poor prognosis. Multiple studies show lower overall survival for patients with PLC than for patients with classic ILC (cILC). We compared the clinicopathologic characteristics of PLC with those of cILC. All cases with a diagnosis of ILC, Nottingham grades 2 or 3 that were diagnosed between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2010, were retrieved from pathology files in the institutional anatomic pathology database. The cases (N = 52) were reviewed to identify those meeting the criteria for PLC. An E-cadherin immunostain was used to confirm the lobular immunophenotype. Clinicopathologic data were assessed and analyzed. A control group (N = 103) of cILC, Nottingham grade 1, was selected, with 2 controls for each case, matched by age and year of diagnosis. PLC was associated more closely with in situ carcinoma (P = .03), and had lower progesterone receptor expression (P = .03) than cILC. Both disease-free survival and overall survival were similar between patients with PLC and matched cILC controls, and both depended on disease stage, tumor size, and lymph node status. PLC is similar to cILC in terms of patient survival and outcomes.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classic lobular carcinoma; Outcome; Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25682191      PMCID: PMC4366360          DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol        ISSN: 1092-9134            Impact factor:   2.090


  19 in total

Review 1.  Distinctive biology of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Roger E Moe; Benjamin O Anderson
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: its cell kinetics, expression of oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes compared with invasive ductal carcinomas and classical infiltrating lobular carcinomas.

Authors:  D Frolik; R Caduff; Z Varga
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 3.  Clinicopathologic and biomarker analysis of invasive pleomorphic lobular carcinoma as compared with invasive classic lobular carcinoma: an experience in our institution and review of the literature.

Authors:  Melissa Jacobs; Fang Fan; Ossama Tawfik
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 2.090

4.  Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma: morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular analysis.

Authors:  L P Middleton; D M Palacios; B R Bryant; P Krebs; C N Otis; M J Merino
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: incidence and variants.

Authors:  V Martinez; J G Azzopardi
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Frequent E-cadherin gene inactivation by loss of heterozygosity in pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  José Palacios; David Sarrió; María C García-Macias; Bonita Bryant; Mark E Sobel; María J Merino
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Molecular profiling pleomorphic lobular carcinomas of the breast: evidence for a common molecular genetic pathway with classic lobular carcinomas.

Authors:  P T Simpson; J S Reis-Filho; M B K Lambros; C Jones; D Steele; A Mackay; M Iravani; K Fenwick; T Dexter; A Jones; L Reid; L Da Silva; S J Shin; D Hardisson; A Ashworth; F C Schmitt; J Palacios; S R Lakhani
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Pleomorphic variant of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  N Weidner; J P Semple
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 9.  Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: a morphologically and clinically distinct variant of lobular carcinoma.

Authors:  Dawn Butler; Marilin Rosa
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: clinicopathologic features of 12 cases.

Authors:  J S Bentz; N Yassa; F Clayton
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.842

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive Review of Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Features of Invasive Lobular Cancer.

Authors:  Nikhil Pramod; Akanksha Nigam; Mustafa Basree; Resham Mawalkar; Saba Mehra; Neelam Shinde; Gary Tozbikian; Nicole Williams; Sarmila Majumder; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-03-16

2.  Biomarker profile of invasive lobular carcinoma: pleomorphic versus classic subtypes, clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis analyses.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Xiulan Luo; Min Chen; Libo Yang; Ting Lei; Tianjie Pu; Bing Wei; Hong Bu; Zhang Zhang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Mitotic score and pleomorphic histology in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: impact on disease-free survival.

Authors:  Rita A Mukhtar; Gregor Krings; Yunn-Yi Chen; Matina E Mamounas; Kelly Fahrner-Scott; Jasmine Wong; Michael Alvarado; Cheryl Ewing; Laura J Esserman; Hope Rugo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Intravital microscopy of collective invasion plasticity in breast cancer.

Authors:  Olga Ilina; Leonard Campanello; Pavlo G Gritsenko; Manon Vullings; Chenlu Wang; Peter Bult; Wolfgang Losert; Peter Friedl
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 5.758

5.  Cell-cell adhesion and 3D matrix confinement determine jamming transitions in breast cancer invasion.

Authors:  Olga Ilina; Pavlo G Gritsenko; Simon Syga; Jürgen Lippoldt; Caterina A M La Porta; Oleksandr Chepizhko; Steffen Grosser; Manon Vullings; Gert-Jan Bakker; Jörn Starruß; Peter Bult; Stefano Zapperi; Josef A Käs; Andreas Deutsch; Peter Friedl
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 28.213

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.