Literature DB >> 25681581

Reoperation rate and risk factors of elective spinal surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: minimum 5-year follow-up.

Shunsuke Sato1, Mitsuru Yagi2, Masayoshi Machida1, Akimasa Yasuda1, Tsunehiko Konomi1, Atsushi Miyake1, Kanehiro Fujiyoshi1, Shinjiro Kaneko1, Masakazu Takemitsu1, Masafumi Machida1, Yoshiyuki Yato1, Takashi Asazuma1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The favorable outcome of surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DS) is widely recognized, but some patients require reoperation because of complications, such as pseudoarthrosis, persistent pain, infection, and progressive degenerative changes. Among these changes, adjacent segmental disease (ASD) and same segmental disease (SSD) are common reasons for reoperation. However, the relative risks of the various factors and their interactions are unclear.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the longitudinal reoperation rate after surgery for DS and to assess the incidence and independent risk factors for ASD and SSD. STUDY
DESIGN: This study is a retrospective consecutive case series of patients with DS who were surgically treated. PATIENT SAMPLE: We assessed 163 consecutive patients who were surgically treated for DS between 2003 and 2008. Individual patients were followed for at least 5 years after the initial surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was any type of second lumbar surgery. Radiographic measurements and demographic data were reviewed. We compared patients who underwent reoperation with those who did not. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relative risk of ASD and SSD in patients surgically treated for DS.
METHODS: Radiographic measurements and demographic data were reviewed. We identified the incidence and risk factors for reoperation, and we performed univariate and multivariate analyses to determine the independent risk factors for revision surgery for SSD and for ASD as the two distinct reasons for the reoperation. Age, gender, etiology, body mass index (BMI), and other radiographic data were analyzed to determine the risk factors for developing SSD and ASD.
RESULTS: The average patient age was 65.8 (50-81 years; 73 women and 90 men; mean follow-up, 5.9±1.6 years). Eighty-nine patients had posterior lumbar interbody fusion and 74 had laminotomies. Twenty-two patients had L3-L4 involvement and 141 had L4-L5 involvement. The cumulative reoperation rate was 6.1% at 1 year, 8.5% at 2 years, 15.2% at 3 years, 17.7% at 5 years, and 23.3% (38/163 patients) at the final follow-up. A significantly higher reoperation rate was observed for patients undergoing laminotomy than for patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion (33.8% vs. 14.4%, p=.01). Eighteen patients (11.0%) had SSD, and 13 patients (8.9%) developed ASD. Higher BMI (obesity) and greater disc height (greater than 10 mm) predicted the occurrence of SSD in the multivariate model (BMI=odds ratio 4.11 [95% confidence interval 1.29-13.11], p=.016; disc height=3.18 [1.03-9.82], p=.044), and gender (male) and facet degeneration (Fujiwara grade greater than 3) predicted the development of ASD in the multivariate model (gender=4.74 [1.09-20.45], p=.037; facet degeneration=6.31 [1.09-36.52], p=.039).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of reoperation in patients surgically treated for DS was 23.2% at a mean time of 5.9 years. A significantly higher incidence of reoperation was observed in patients treated with decompression alone compared with those treated with decompression and fusion. Body mass index and disc height were identified as independent risk factors for SSD, whereas male gender and facet degeneration were identified as independent risk factors for ASD. The results of this comprehensive review will guide spine surgeons in their preoperative planning and in the surgical management of patients with DS, thereby reducing the reoperation rate.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjacent segmental disease; Complication; Deep wound infection; Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis; Laminotomy; Re-operation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25681581     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  27 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor concerning "Risk factors for adjacent segment pathology requiring additional surgery after single-level spinal fusion: impact of pre-existing spinal stenosis demonstrated by preoperative myelography" by I. Yugue et al. (2015) Eur Spine J Aug 14 [Epub ahead of print].

Authors:  Yi Shen; Dan Peng; Zhihui Dai; Weiye Zhong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Degenerative spondylolisthesis: contemporary review of the role of interbody fusion.

Authors:  Joseph F Baker; Thomas J Errico; Yong Kim; Afshin Razi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-11-25

3.  Reoperation of decompression alone or decompression plus fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhao Lang; Jing-Sheng Li; Felix Yang; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Louis G Jenis; Thomas D Cha; James D Kang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Sarfraz Ahmad; Abdulkader Hamad; Amit Bhalla; Sarah Turner; Birender Balain; David Jaffray
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Treatment for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Current Concepts and New Evidence.

Authors:  Andre M Samuel; Harold G Moore; Matthew E Cunningham
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

6.  Effect of body mass index on patient outcomes of surgical intervention for the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Michael Flippin; Jessica Harris; Elizabeth W Paxton; Heather A Prentice; Donald C Fithian; Samuel R Ward; Sara P Gombatto
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

7.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a silicon nitride cage demonstrates early radiographic fusion.

Authors:  Mitchell T Gray; Kyle P Davis; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal; Micah W Smith
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

8.  Treatment of low back pain elicited by superior cluneal nerve entrapment neuropathy after lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors:  Naotaka Iwamoto; Toyohiko Isu; Kyongsong Kim; Yasuhiro Chiba; Daijiro Morimoto; Juntaro Matsumoto; Masanori Isobe
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-12-20

9.  The prevalence of complications associated with lumbar and thoracic spinal deformity surgery in the elderly population: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Colleen Smith; Nayan Lamba; Zhonghui Ou; Quynh-Anh Vo; Lita Araujo-Lama; Sanghee Lim; Dhaivat Joshi; Joanne Doucette; Stefania Papatheodorou; Ian Tafel; Linda S Aglio; Timothy R Smith; Rania A Mekary; Hasan Zaidi
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

10.  A Comparative Study of Decompressive Laminectomy and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Grade I Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Sang-Il Kim; Kee-Yong Ha; Young-Hoon Kim; Young-Ho Kim; In-Soo Oh
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.