Literature DB >> 25681183

Association of shifting populations in the root zone microbiome of millet with enhanced crop productivity in the Sahel region (Africa).

Spencer J Debenport1, Komi Assigbetse2, Roger Bayala3, Lydie Chapuis-Lardy2, Richard P Dick4, Brian B McSpadden Gardener5.   

Abstract

This study characterized specific changes in the millet root zone microbiome stimulated by long-term woody-shrub intercropping at different sites in Senegal. At the two study sites, intercropping with woody shrubs and shrub residue resulted in a significant increase in millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] yield (P < 0.05) and associated patterns of increased diversity in both bacterial and fungal communities in the root zone of the crop. Across four experiments, operational taxonomic units (OTUs) belonging to Chitinophaga were consistently significantly (P < 0.001) enriched in the intercropped samples, and "Candidatus Koribacter" was consistently significantly enriched in samples where millet was grown alone. Those OTUs belonging to Chitinophaga were enriched more than 30-fold in residue-amended samples and formed a distinct subgroup from all OTUs detected in the genus. Additionally, OTUs belonging to 8 fungal genera (Aspergillus, Coniella, Epicoccum, Fusarium, Gibberella, Lasiodiplodia, Penicillium, and Phoma) were significantly (P < 0.005) enriched in all experiments at all sites in intercropped samples. The OTUs of four genera (Epicoccum, Fusarium, Gibberella, and Haematonectria) were consistently enriched at sites where millet was grown alone. Those enriched OTUs in intercropped samples showed consistently large-magnitude differences, ranging from 30- to 1,000-fold increases in abundance. Consistently enriched OTUs in intercropped samples in the genera Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Penicillium also formed phylogenetically distinct subgroups. These results suggest that the intercropping system used here can influence the recruitment of potentially beneficial microorganisms to the root zone of millet and aid subsistence farmers in producing higher-yielding crops.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25681183      PMCID: PMC4375326          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.04122-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  17 in total

1.  Metatranscriptomic analysis of arctic peat soil microbiota.

Authors:  Alexander T Tveit; Tim Urich; Mette M Svenning
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Soil microbial responses to increased moisture and organic resources along a salinity gradient in a polar desert.

Authors:  David J Van Horn; Jordan G Okie; Heather N Buelow; Michael N Gooseff; John E Barrett; Cristina D Takacs-Vesbach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Influence of intercropping and intercropping plus rhizobial inoculation on microbial activity and community composition in rhizosphere of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and Siberian wild rye (Elymus sibiricus L.).

Authors:  Yan Mei Sun; Nan Nan Zhang; En Tao Wang; Hong Li Yuan; Jin Shui Yang; Wen Xin Chen
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 4.194

4.  Linking sequence to function in soil bacteria: sequence-directed isolation of novel bacteria contributing to soilborne plant disease suppression.

Authors:  María-Soledad Benítez; Brian B McSpadden Gardener
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms.

Authors:  J Gregory Caporaso; Christian L Lauber; William A Walters; Donna Berg-Lyons; James Huntley; Noah Fierer; Sarah M Owens; Jason Betley; Louise Fraser; Markus Bauer; Niall Gormley; Jack A Gilbert; Geoff Smith; Rob Knight
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis.

Authors:  J R Cole; Q Wang; E Cardenas; J Fish; B Chai; R J Farris; A S Kulam-Syed-Mohideen; D M McGarrell; T Marsh; G M Garrity; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data.

Authors:  Paul J McMurdie; Susan Holmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Digging the New York City Skyline: soil fungal communities in green roofs and city parks.

Authors:  Krista L McGuire; Sara G Payne; Matthew I Palmer; Caitlyn M Gillikin; Dominique Keefe; Su Jin Kim; Seren M Gedallovich; Julia Discenza; Ramya Rangamannar; Jennifer A Koshner; Audrey L Massmann; Giulia Orazi; Adam Essene; Jonathan W Leff; Noah Fierer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible.

Authors:  Paul J McMurdie; Susan Holmes
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Sampling and Selection Factors that Enhance the Diversity of Microbial Collections: Application to Biopesticide Development.

Authors:  Jun-Kyung Park; Seung-Hwan Lee; Jang-Hoon Lee; Songhee Han; Hunseung Kang; Jin-Cheol Kim; Young Cheol Kim; Brian McSpadden Gardener
Journal:  Plant Pathol J       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.795

View more
  8 in total

1.  Diazotroph Community Characterization via a High-Throughput nifH Amplicon Sequencing and Analysis Pipeline.

Authors:  John Christian Gaby; Lavanya Rishishwar; Lina C Valderrama-Aguirre; Stefan J Green; Augusto Valderrama-Aguirre; I King Jordan; Joel E Kostka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  What's Inside That Seed We Brew? A New Approach To Mining the Coffee Microbiome.

Authors:  Michael Joe Vaughan; Thomas Mitchell; Brian B McSpadden Gardener
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Rhizocompartments and environmental factors affect microbial composition and variation in native plants.

Authors:  Myung-Suk Kang; Moonsuk Hur; Soo-Je Park
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.422

4.  Manure and mineral fertilization change enzyme activity and bacterial community in millet rhizosphere soils.

Authors:  Lixia Xu; Min Yi; Huilan Yi; Erhu Guo; Aiying Zhang
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  Potential Use of Microbial Community Genomes in Various Dimensions of Agriculture Productivity and Its Management: A Review.

Authors:  Mir Asif Iquebal; Jaisri Jagannadham; Sarika Jaiswal; Ratna Prabha; Anil Rai; Dinesh Kumar
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.064

6.  Taxonomic structure and functional association of foxtail millet root microbiome.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Yayu Wang; Yueying Huang; Jin Xu; Pengfan Zhang; Nian Wang; Xin Liu; Haiyan Chu; Guang Liu; Honggang Jiang; Yuzhen Li; Jing Xu; Karsten Kristiansen; Liang Xiao; Yunzeng Zhang; Gengyun Zhang; Guohua Du; Houbao Zhang; Hongfeng Zou; Haifeng Zhang; Zhuye Jie; Suisha Liang; Huijue Jia; Jingwang Wan; Dechun Lin; Jinying Li; Guangyi Fan; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Yang Bai; Xun Xu
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 6.524

7.  Metagenome-Wide Association Study and Machine Learning Prediction of Bulk Soil Microbiome and Crop Productivity.

Authors:  Hao-Xun Chang; James S Haudenshield; Charles R Bowen; Glen L Hartman
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Challenges and Approaches in Microbiome Research: From Fundamental to Applied.

Authors:  Chrysi Sergaki; Beatriz Lagunas; Ian Lidbury; Miriam L Gifford; Patrick Schäfer
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.753

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.