Literature DB >> 25680736

Nonword repetition and phoneme elision in adults who do and do not stutter: Vocal versus nonvocal performance differences.

Courtney T Byrd1, Megann McGill2, Evan Usler3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to enhance our understanding of phonological working memory in adults who stutter through the comparison of nonvocal versus vocal nonword repetition and phoneme elision task performance differences.
METHOD: For the vocal nonword repetition condition, participants repeated sets of 4- and 7-syllable nonwords (n=12 per set). For the nonvocal nonword repetition condition, participants silently identified each target nonword from a subsequent set of three nonwords. For the vocal phoneme elision condition, participants repeated nonwords with a target phoneme eliminated. For the nonvocal phoneme elision condition, participants silently identified the nonword with the designated target phoneme eliminated from a subsequent set of three nonwords.
RESULTS: Adults who stutter produced significantly fewer accurate initial productions of 7-syllable nonwords compared to adults who do not stutter. There were no talker group differences for the silent identification of nonwords, but both talker groups required significantly more mean number of attempts to accurately silently identify 7-syllable as compared to 4-syllable nonwords. For the vocal phoneme elision condition, adults who stutter were significantly less accurate than adults who do not stutter in their initial production and required a significantly higher mean number of attempts to accurately produce 7-syllable nonwords with a phoneme eliminated. This talker group difference was also significant for the nonvocal phoneme elision condition for both 4- and 7-syllable nonwords.
CONCLUSION: Present findings suggest phonological working memory may contribute to the difficulties persons who stutter have establishing and/or maintaining fluent speech. EDUCATIONAL
OBJECTIVES: (a) Readers can describe the role of phonological working memory in planning for and execution of speech; (b) readers can describe two experimental tasks for exploring the phonological working memory: nonword repetition and phoneme elision; (c) readers can describe how the nonword repetition and phoneme elision skills of adults who stutter differ from their typically fluent peers.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adults who stutter; Nonword repetition; Phoneme elision; Phonological working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25680736     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fluency Disord        ISSN: 0094-730X            Impact factor:   2.538


  11 in total

1.  Phonological Working Memory for Words and Nonwords in Cerebral Cortex.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Satrajit S Ghosh; Irina Ostrovskaya; John D E Gabrieli; Ioulia Kovelman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Abnormal neural response to phonological working memory demands in persistent developmental stuttering.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Fanlu Jia; Peter T Fox; Wai Ting Siok; Li Hai Tan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-26       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Common cortical architectures for phonological working memory identified in individual brains.

Authors:  Terri L Scott; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The Effects of Syntactic Complexity and Sentence Length on the Speech Motor Control of School-Age Children Who Stutter.

Authors:  Evan R Usler; Bridget Walsh
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Adults Who Stutter Show Diminished Word Fluency, Regardless of Mode.

Authors:  Erica Lescht; Michael Walsh Dickey; Melissa D Stockbridge; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.674

6.  The effect of phonetic complexity on the speed of single-word productions in adults who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Courtney T Byrd; Geoffrey A Coalson; Jie Yang; Kirsten Moriarty
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  What Can Network Science Tell Us About Phonology and Language Processing?

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-04-09

8.  From Grapheme to Phonological Output: Performance of Adults Who Stutter on a Word Jumble Task.

Authors:  Megann McGill; Harvey Sussman; Courtney T Byrd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Nonword repetition in adults who stutter: The effects of stimuli stress and auditory-orthographic cues.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Coalson; Courtney T Byrd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Efficacy of Phonological Processing Treatment on Stuttering Severity in Persian Pre-School Children.

Authors:  Neda Tahmasebi; Mohadeseh Rasti Borujeni; Majid Soltani; Mahmoud Latifi; Negin Moradi
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2019
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.