Literature DB >> 25680701

A Nationally Representative Study of Early Childhood Home Visiting Service Use in the United States.

Paul Lanier1, Kathryn Maguire-Jack2, Hannah Welch3.   

Abstract

Early childhood home visiting (HV) services are expanding broadly across the United States. Supported by federal policy, HV is now an integral part of maternal and child health services. However, no nationally representative estimate of HV use is available and no research has compared HV use across states. The 2011/12 National Survey on Children's Health was used to estimate the national and state prevalence of HV use for children 0-3 years. Generalized linear mixed modeling was used to predict HV use. An estimated 2,137,044 US children and families received HV during pregnancy and up to child age of 3 years. State HV prevalence range was 3.7-30.6 %. Nationally, 19.1 % of children below the federal poverty line received HV services. Although family poverty increased the odds of receiving HV services, higher rates of child poverty at the state level predicted less use of HV services. Important predictors of HV use include infant/child need factors (health risk, adverse experiences), predisposing factors (family size), and enabling factors (insurance type). This study provides the first estimates of national and state HV service use. Although findings indicate HV services are targeted to children at elevated risk for poor physical or developmental outcomes, our estimates show the vast majority of at-risk children did not receive HV services, including more than 80 % of low-income children, 76 % of preterm infants, and 57 % of very low birth weight infants. Increasing HV service availability could decrease negative health outcomes for young children.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Home visiting; Policy; Prevention; Public health

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25680701     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-015-1727-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  12 in total

1.  Family poverty, welfare reform, and child development.

Authors:  G J Duncan; J Brooks-Gunn
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  Socioeconomic status and child development.

Authors:  Robert H Bradley; Robert F Corwyn
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?

Authors:  R M Andersen
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1995-03

4.  Adverse childhood experiences and smoking during adolescence and adulthood.

Authors:  R F Anda; J B Croft; V J Felitti; D Nordenberg; W H Giles; D F Williamson; G A Giovino
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Adverse childhood experiences and the risk of depressive disorders in adulthood.

Authors:  Daniel P Chapman; Charles L Whitfield; Vincent J Felitti; Shanta R Dube; Valerie J Edwards; Robert F Anda
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 6.  Long-term developmental outcomes of low birth weight infants.

Authors:  M Hack; N K Klein; H G Taylor
Journal:  Future Child       Date:  1995

7.  Comparing primiparous and multiparous mothers in a nurse home visiting prevention program.

Authors:  Paul Lanier; Melissa Jonson-Reid
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.689

8.  Toward Population Impact from Home Visiting.

Authors:  Kenneth A Dodge; W Benjamin Goodman; Robert Murphy; Karen O'Donnell; Jeannine Sato
Journal:  Zero Three       Date:  2013-01-01

9.  Overview of the federal home visiting program.

Authors:  Terry Adirim; Lauren Supplee
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  Effectiveness of home visiting in improving child health and reducing child maltreatment.

Authors:  Sarah A Avellar; Lauren H Supplee
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  5 in total

1.  CHECK: A randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of home visitation in pediatric weight loss treatment.

Authors:  B M Appelhans; S A French; L E Bradley; K Lui; I Janssen; D Richardson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  An intervention that increases parental sensitivity in families referred to Child Protective Services also changes toddlers' parasympathetic regulation.

Authors:  Paul D Hastings; Sarah Kahle; Charles Fleming; Mary Jane Lohr; Lynn Fainsilber Katz; Monica L Oxford
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2018-08-29

3.  Preventing child maltreatment: Examination of an established statewide home-visiting program.

Authors:  Barbara H Chaiyachati; Julie R Gaither; Marcia Hughes; Karen Foley-Schain; John M Leventhal
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2018-03-20

4.  Participant experiences in a paraprofessional-led weight management program for children and families.

Authors:  Amy Saxe-Custack; Jean M Kerver; Getrude Mphwanthe; Lorraine Weatherspoon
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-07-12

5.  Transitions to virtual early childhood home visitation during COVID-19.

Authors:  Dorian Traube; Sharlene Gozalians; Lei Duan
Journal:  Infant Ment Health J       Date:  2021-12-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.