Literature DB >> 25680420

Lacrimal and nasal masquerades of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions: etiology, management, and outcomes.

Saurabh Kamal1, Mohammad Javed Ali2, Adit Gupta1, Milind N Naik1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to report various conditions masquerading as congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO). Retrospective review was designed in a tertiary hospital setting. 92 eyes of 65 consecutive patients were included in this study. All patients presenting with CNLDO symptomatology but where the diagnosis of CNLDO was subsequently ruled out were included in the study. The study patients were recruited from a single surgeon's (MJA) tertiary eye care practice over a 3-year period from 2011 to 2013. A detailed clinical evaluation and a further lacrimal system evaluation were performed under general anesthesia. The main outcome measure was other lacrimal and nasal conditions masquerading as CNLDO. Average age at presentation was 43.49 ± 31.78 months. All cases had symptoms of either watering or discharge with an increase tear meniscus or abnormal fluorescein dye disappearance test. The commonest masquerades of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction include incomplete punctal canalisation (27.2 %), functional epiphora (14.1 %), punctal agenesis (14.1 %), monocanalicular obstructions (10.8 %), and presaccal stenosis (8.7 %). Each masquerade was managed specifically and at the last follow-up of 5.85 ± 10.85 months, 63 % eyes (58/92) had no epiphora and 2.2 % (2/92) eyes had occasional epiphora. Parents of patients with punctal agenesis were counseled for option of conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy in future. Incomplete punctal canalisation is the commonest masquerade among many conditions that may mimic CNLDO and mandates a careful evaluation. Specific management of each masquerade results in satisfactory outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNLDO; Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction; Functional epiphora; Incomplete punctal canalization; Presaccal stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25680420     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-015-0050-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  10 in total

Review 1.  Perspective: what does the term functional mean in the context of epiphora?

Authors:  WengOnn Chan; Raman Malhotra; Hirohiko Kakizaki; Igal Leibovitch; Dinesh Selva
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 4.207

2.  Dacryoendoscopic findings of lacrimal passage with congenital punctal atresia.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Takahashi; Hiromichi Matsuda; Yasuhisa Nakamura; Hirohiko Kakizaki
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  2013-10

3.  Epiphora during the first year of life.

Authors:  C J MacEwen; J D Young
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Congenital impatency of the nasolacrimal duct.

Authors:  D GUERRY; E L KENDIG
Journal:  Arch Ophthal       Date:  1948-02

5.  Morphogenesis of the human excretory lacrimal system.

Authors:  C de la Cuadra-Blanco; M D Peces-Peña; L Jáñez-Escalada; J R Mérida-Velasco
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Incomplete punctal canalisation: the external and internal punctal membranes. Outcomes of membranotomy and adjunctive procedures.

Authors:  Mohammad Javed Ali; Samir Mohapatra; Kaustubh Mulay; Milind N Naik; Santosh G Honavar
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Resolution of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with nonsurgical management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06

8.  Endoscopic-assisted probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  E J Wallace; A Cox; P White; C J Macewen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Canalicular wall dysgenesis: the clinical profile of canalicular hypoplasia and aplasia, associated systemic and lacrimal anomalies, and clinical implications.

Authors:  Mohammad Javed Ali; Milind N Naik
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.746

10.  Lacrimal outflow dysgenesis.

Authors:  Sonia J Ahn Yuen; Christine Oley; Timothy J Sullivan
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.079

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.