Literature DB >> 25679873

Breast cancer brain metastases: evidence for neuronal-like adaptation in a 'breast-to-brain' transition?

Amanda Ed Van Swearingen, Marni B Siegel, Carey K Anders.   

Abstract

Brain metastases remain a significant challenge in the treatment of breast cancer patients due to the unique environment posed by the central nervous system. A better understanding of the biology of breast cancer cells that have metastasized to the brain is required to develop improved therapies. A recent Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences article demonstrates that breast cancer cells in the brain microenvironment express γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-related genes, enabling them to utilize GABA as an oncometabolite, thus gaining a proliferative advantage. In this viewpoint, we highlight these findings and their potential impact on the treatment of breast cancer brain metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25679873      PMCID: PMC4052941          DOI: 10.1186/bcr3651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res        ISSN: 1465-5411            Impact factor:   6.466


Breast cancer brain metastases represent a clinically unmet need and are poorly understood

Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) are an increasingly common occurrence and portend a poor prognosis [1]. Treatment of BCBMs represents an unmet medical need as there are currently no approved therapies aside from surgical resection and cranial radiation [2]. Limited systemic treatment options for BCBMs are due, in part, to the unique challenges posed by the neural environment. Protection afforded by the blood-brain barrier produces an immune-privileged sanctuary and prevents many systemic therapies from penetrating the brain, affording cancer cells unique opportunities to flourish within the neural environment. The added complication of drug delivery to BCBMs coupled with our poor understanding of the factors unique to BCBM growth, metabolism, and stromal interactions continues to hinder the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Two major questions regarding BCBMs are (1) what factors optimize BCBM cells to seed and survive in the brain microenvironment, and (2) whether the factors are present in the primary breast cancer cells or are acquired during metastasis. Among the breast cancer subtypes, HER2-enriched (HER2+) and triple-negative primary tumors show higher rates of brain relapse relative to hormone receptor-positive tumors [3,4], suggesting that some innate feature(s) of primary tumor cells may dictate the development of brain metastases. Recent literature suggests that, prior to reaching the brain, some metastatic primary breast cancer cells already express proteins that are essential for the establishment of brain metastases, including serpins [5], matrix metalloproteases [6,7], and αB-crystallin [8]. Once in the brain, recent studies have shown BCBM cells transform the surrounding glia and neurons to create a more permissive microenvironment [9-11]. Of note, tumor-activated astrocytes have been shown to play a chemo-protective role for brain metastases [9] and enhance cancer cell proliferation and survival [6,12]. Targeting reactive astrocytes in the tumor microenvironment yields therapeutic benefit in vivo by decreasing cancer cell seeding growth in the brain [13,14]. Thus, current evidence suggests that BCBMs are the result of both primed breast cancer cells as well as adaptation to and alteration of the brain-tumor microenvironment. Better understanding of the brain microenvironment and its interactions with breast cancer cells are critical for the development of improved treatments for BCBMs.

New research provides evidence for breast cancer metabolic adaptation to the unique brain microenvironment

A recent elegant study by Neman and colleagues [15] investigated whether human BCBMs develop from primed cells in the primary tumor, or if surviving metastatic cells adapt to the brain’s unique microenvironment. The authors compare triple-negative and HER2+ primary breast tumors, brain metastases, and representative human-derived cell lines. Relative to both primary tumors and cell lines, the brain metastases exhibit increased expression of several components related to signaling of the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), including GABAA receptors, GABA transporters (vesicular GABA transporter, GABA transporter 1-3, GABA-betaine transporter, and glutamate decarboxylase), and GABA transaminase. The study demonstrates that upregulation of GABA-related proteins enables increased transport and metabolism of GABA in BCBMs cells, thereby increasing cell proliferation. The BCBMs cells also acquire features of GABAergic interneurons, expressing interneuron-specific markers like parvalbumin and reelin, characteristics not seen in the primary tumors.

Future treatments should target the permissive brain microenvironment and the resulting adaptations in addition to breast cancer cells themselves

This work represents one of the few studies that directly compares human primary breast tumors with brain metastases (rather than assessing brain metastases alone and/or breast cancer cell lines in vitro or in mouse models) to identify novel factors involved in BCBM biology. These results also add to a growing body of evidence showing a ‘breast-to-brain’ transition with cancer cells adapting to the unique brain microenvironment and acquiring neuronal characteristics that are not seen at either the primary and/or other non-brain metastatic sites [16]. The possibility remains, however, that a small population of ‘seed’ cells in primary tumors are primed for brain metastases with additional adaptations that occur in the brain microenvironment ‘soil’ [17,18]. The acquisition of a novel, neuronal-like GABA shunt metabolism by the BCBM cells is one of the most groundbreaking findings of Neman and colleagues’ article. Cancer cells can exhibit a glycolytic, Warburg-like metabolism instead of oxidative phosphorylation as seen in normal tissues [19]; the GABA shunt in BCBMs reflects yet another metabolic and proliferative advantage utilized by breast cancer cells within the neural environment by providing additional energy through generation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. This acquired metabolism may provide a unique target for brain metastases using therapies that inhibit GABA metabolism. Notably, several inhibitors of GABA are approved in the clinical setting for treatment of epilepsy [20]; however, careful research is required to determine whether selectively targeting this oncometabolite in the setting of BCBM will be safe and effective. Additionally, in vivo modeling of GABA metabolism in BCBMs is needed to further establish this adaptive response in the context of a full organism. Ultimately, the work presented by Neman and colleagues places us one step closer to successful therapeutic strategies targeting not only breast cancer cells themselves, but also the supporting brain microenvironment, with the goal of improving survival for patients with BCBM.

Abbreviations

BCBM: Breast cancer brain metastasis; GABA: γ-aminobutyric acid.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed to the writing and editing of this manuscript.
  20 in total

1.  On the origin of cancer cells.

Authors:  O WARBURG
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-02-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. 1889.

Authors:  S Paget
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 9.264

3.  Pazopanib reveals a role for tumor cell B-Raf in the prevention of HER2+ breast cancer brain metastasis.

Authors:  Brunilde Gril; Diane Palmieri; Yong Qian; DeeDee Smart; Lilia Ileva; David J Liewehr; Seth M Steinberg; Patricia S Steeg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Astrocytes upregulate survival genes in tumor cells and induce protection from chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sun-Jin Kim; Jang-Seong Kim; Eun Sung Park; Ju-Seog Lee; Qingtang Lin; Robert R Langley; Marva Maya; Junqin He; Seung-Wook Kim; Zhang Weihua; Krishnakumar Balasubramanian; Dominic Fan; Gordon B Mills; Mien-Chie Hung; Isaiah J Fidler
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 5.  Regulation of excitation by GABA neurotransmission: focus on metabolism and transport.

Authors:  Karsten K Madsen; Orla M Larsson; Arne Schousboe
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  2008

6.  Subtypes of breast cancer show preferential site of relapse.

Authors:  Marcel Smid; Yixin Wang; Yi Zhang; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Jack Yu; Jan G M Klijn; John A Foekens; John W M Martens
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the 'seed and soil' hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  Isaiah J Fidler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Breast cancer brain metastases: differences in survival depending on biological subtype, RPA RTOG prognostic class and systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT).

Authors:  A Niwińska; M Murawska; K Pogoda
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Guidelines for the initial management of metastatic brain tumors: role of surgery, radiosurgery, and radiation therapy.

Authors:  Matthew G Ewend; David E Morris; Lisa A Carey; Alim M Ladha; Steven Brem
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 11.908

10.  Reactive glia are recruited by highly proliferative brain metastases of breast cancer and promote tumor cell colonization.

Authors:  Daniel P Fitzgerald; Diane Palmieri; Emily Hua; Elizabeth Hargrave; Jeanne M Herring; Yongzhen Qian; Eleazar Vega-Valle; Robert J Weil; Andreas M Stark; Alexander O Vortmeyer; Patricia S Steeg
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 5.150

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  KISS1 in breast cancer progression and autophagy.

Authors:  Ilya V Ulasov; Anton V Borovjagin; Peter Timashev; Massimo Cristofanili; Danny R Welch
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 9.264

2.  SOX9 Is Essential for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cell Survival and Metastasis.

Authors:  Yanxia Ma; Jonathan Shepherd; Dekuang Zhao; Lakshmi Reddy Bollu; William M Tahaney; Jamal Hill; Yun Zhang; Abhijit Mazumdar; Powel H Brown
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 5.852

3.  Approaches for optimal drug development and clinical trial design for breast cancer brain metastasis.

Authors:  Marni B Siegel; Amanda E D Van Swearingen; Carey K Anders
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 4.  Mystery of the brain metastatic disease in breast cancer patients: improved patient stratification, disease prediction and targeted prevention on the horizon?

Authors:  Jiri Polivka; Milena Kralickova; Jiri Polivka; Christina Kaiser; Walther Kuhn; Olga Golubnitschaja
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 6.543

5.  Combined kinase inhibitors of MEK1/2 and either PI3K or PDGFR are efficacious in intracranial triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Amanda E D Van Swearingen; Maria J Sambade; Marni B Siegel; Shivani Sud; Robert S McNeill; Samantha M Bevill; Xin Chen; Ryan E Bash; Louisa Mounsey; Brian T Golitz; Charlene Santos; Allison Deal; Joel S Parker; Naim Rashid; C Ryan Miller; Gary L Johnson; Carey K Anders
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Phenotypic Plasticity Conferred by the Metastatic Microenvironment of the Brain Strengthens the Intracranial Tumorigenicity of Lung Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Xu-Ge Wei; Ke-Wei Bi; Bo Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Modeling of hypo/hyperglycemia and their impact on breast cancer progression related molecules.

Authors:  Sirin A I Adham; Hasina Al Rawahi; Sumaya Habib; Mansour S Al Moundhri; Alicia Viloria-Petit; Brenda L Coomber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The role of REST and HDAC2 in epigenetic dysregulation of Nav1.5 and nNav1.5 expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Nur Sabrina Kamarulzaman; Hemaniswarri Dewi Dewadas; Chiuan Yee Leow; Nik Soriani Yaacob; Noor Fatmawati Mokhtar
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.722

9.  T lymphocytes facilitate brain metastasis of breast cancer by inducing Guanylate-Binding Protein 1 expression.

Authors:  Dana A M Mustafa; Rute M S M Pedrosa; Marcel Smid; Marcel van der Weiden; Vanja de Weerd; Alex L Nigg; Cor Berrevoets; Lona Zeneyedpour; Neibla Priego; Manuel Valiente; Theo M Luider; Reno Debets; John W M Martens; John A Foekens; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Johan M Kros
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 17.088

10.  Early neonatal loss of inhibitory synaptic input to the spinal motor neurons confers spina bifida-like leg dysfunction in a chicken model.

Authors:  Md Sakirul Islam Khan; Hiroaki Nabeka; Farzana Islam; Tetsuya Shimokawa; Shouichiro Saito; Xuan Li; Soichiro Kawabe; Fumihiko Hamada; Tetsuya Tachibana; Seiji Matsuda
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 5.758

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.