Literature DB >> 25679065

Detection of MDM2/CDK4 amplification in lipomatous soft tissue tumors from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue: comparison of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

David Creytens1, Joost van Gorp, Liesbeth Ferdinande, Ernst-Jan Speel, Louis Libbrecht.   

Abstract

In this study, the detection of MDM2 and CDK4 amplification was evaluated in lipomatous soft tissue tumors using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), a PCR-based technique, in comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). These 2 techniques were evaluated in a series of 77 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lipomatous tumors (27 benign adipose tumors, 28 atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas, 18 dedifferentiated liposarcomas, and 4 pleomorphic liposarcomas). Using MLPA, with a cut-off ratio of >2, 36/71 samples (22 atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas, and 14 dedifferentiated liposarcomas) showed MDM2 and CDK4 amplification. Using FISH as gold standard, MLPA showed a sensitivity of 90% (36/40) and a specificity of 100% (31/31) in detecting amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 in lipomatous soft tissue tumors. In case of high-level amplification (MDM2-CDK4/CEP12 ratio >5), concordance was 100%. Four cases of atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (4/26, 15%) with a low MDM2 and CDK4 amplification level (MDM2-CDK4/CEP12 ratio ranging between 2 and 2.5) detected by FISH showed no amplification by MLPA, although gain of MDM2 and CDK4 (ratios ranging between 1.6 and 1.9) was seen with MLPA. No amplification was detected in benign lipomatous tumors and pleomorphic liposarcomas. Furthermore, there was a very high concordance between the ratios obtained by FISH and MLPA. In conclusion, MLPA proves to be an appropriate and straightforward technique for screening MDM2/CDK4 amplification in lipomatous tumors, especially when a correct cut-off value and reference samples are chosen, and could be considered a good alternative to FISH to determine MDM2 and CDK4 amplification in liposarcomas. Moreover, because MLPA, as a multiplex technique, allows simultaneous detection of multiple chromosomal changes of interest, it could be in the future a very reliable and fast molecular analysis on paraffin-embedded material to test for other diagnostically, prognostically, or therapeutically relevant genomic mutations in lipomatous tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25679065     DOI: 10.1097/PDM.0000000000000041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol        ISSN: 1533-4058


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation Criteria for Chromosome Instability Detection by FISH to Predict Malignant Progression in Premalignant Glottic Laryngeal Lesions.

Authors:  Verona E Bergshoeff; Maschenka C A Balkenhol; Annick Haesevoets; Andrea Ruland; Michelene N Chenault; Rik C Nelissen; Carine J Peutz; Ruud Clarijs; Jeroen A W M Van der Laak; Robert P Takes; Michiel W Van den Brekel; Marie-Louise F Van Velthuysen; Frans C S Ramaekers; Bernd Kremer; Ernst-Jan M Speel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Atypical spindle cell/pleomorphic lipomatous tumor.

Authors:  Evelyne Lecoutere; David Creytens
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Retroperitoneal liposarcoma: current insights in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Lucas E Matthyssens; David Creytens; Wim P Ceelen
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-02-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.