| Literature DB >> 25678919 |
Reza Nabavi1, Brendan Conneely2, Elaine McCarthy3, Barbara Good4, Parviz Shayan5, Theo DE Waal3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of sheep nematodes is a critical point in epidemiological studies and monitoring of drug resistance in flocks. However, due to a close morphological similarity between the eggs and larval stages of many of these nematodes, such identification is not a trivial task. There are a number of studies showing that molecular targets in ribosomal DNA (Internal transcribed spacer 1, 2 and Intergenic spacer) are suitable for accurate identification of sheep bursate nematodes. The objective of present study was to compare the ITS1, ITS2 and IGS regions of Iranian common bursate nematodes in order to choose best target for specific identification methods.Entities:
Keywords: Bursate nematodes; Intergenic spacer; Internal transcribed spacers; Similarity score
Year: 2014 PMID: 25678919 PMCID: PMC4316566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Parasitol ISSN: 1735-7020 Impact factor: 1.012
The primers used in amplification of ITS1, 5.8s, ITS2 and IGS regions. F: Forward primers, R: Reverse primers
| Species | Forward and reverse primers used to amplification of ITS1, 5.8s, ITS2 (5′-3′) | Forward and reverse primers used to amplification of IGS (5′-3′) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | GCGGGAAACAGTTCAATCGC | F | ACCGTCGTGAGACAGGTTAG | |
| R | TCCCCGTTCACTCGCCGTTA | R | CTTAGACATGCATGGCTTAATC | |
| F | GCGGGAAACAGTTCAATCGC | F | ACCGTCGTGAGACAGGTTAG | |
| R | TCCCCGTTCACTCGCCGTTA | R | CTGCTCTAATGAGCCGTTCG | |
| F | GCGGGAAACAGTTCAATCGC | F | GCGACGTTGCTTTTTGATCC | |
| R | TCCCCGTTCACTCGCCGTTA | R | CTGCTCTAATGAGCCGTTCG | |
| F | GCGGGAAACAGTTCAATCGC | F | ACCGTCGTGAGACAGGTTAG | |
| R | TCCCCGTTCACTCGCCGTTA | R | CTGCTCTAATGAGCCGTTCG | |
| F | GTAGGTGAACTGCGGAAGGATCATT | F | ACCGTCGTGAGACAGGTTAG | |
| R | TTAGTTTTCCTCCGCT | R | CTGCTCTAATGAGCCGTTCG | |
Accession numbers of the ITS1, ITS2 and IGS sequences used as comparison in the present study
| Nematode Species (Origin) | ITS1, Accession no | ITS2, Accession no | IGS, Accession no |
|---|---|---|---|
| HQ389229 | HQ389229 | HQ389234 | |
| HQ389230 | HQ389230 | HQ389235 | |
| HQ389231 | HQ389231 | HQ389236 | |
| HQ389232 | HQ389232 | HQ389237 | |
| HQ389233 | HQ389233 | HQ389238 | |
| JF680983 | JF680983 | JF680983 | |
| JF680984 | JF680984 | JF680984 | |
| JF680985 | - | - | |
| EU0846911 | EU0846911 | - | |
| AF044934.1 | AY439025.1 | - | |
| AY013242.1 | AJ577469.1 | - | |
| Y15876.1 | AB503242.1 | - |
Fig. 1Amplified total fragment of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 for 1: Haemonchus contortus, 2 and 3: Teladorsagia circumcincta, 4: Marshallagia marshalli, 5: Nematodirus oiratianus, 6: Trichostrongylus colubriformis, N is negative control and M is 100 bp marker
The length of sequenced ITS1, ITS2 and IGS regions in Iranian isolates
| Species | ITS1(bp) | ITS2(bp) | IGS(bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 400 | 231 | 380 | |
| 391 | 248 | 179 | |
| 383 | 237 | 457 | |
| 387 | 240 | 457 | |
| 382 | 238 | 207 |
Partial sequence
Fig. 2Amplified total fragment of IGS-ETS for 1: Teladorsagia circumcincta, 2: Haemonchus contortus, 3: Nematodirus oiratianus, 4: Trichostrongylus colubriformis, 5: Marshallagia marshalli, N is negative control and M is 100 bp marker
Similarity score percentage of ITS1 and ITS2 sequences of studied nematodes and some available sequences from GenBank
| ITS2 | Haemonchus contortus (Iran) | Teladorsagia circumcincta (Iran) | Marshallagia marshalli (Iran) | Trichostrongylus colubriformis (Iran) | Nematodirus oiratianus (Iran) | Haemonchus contortus (Africa) | Teladorsagia circumcincta (UK) | Trichostrongylus colubriformis (UK) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | 78 | 78 | 77 | 65 | 97 | 78 | - | 100 | 82 | 79 | 77 | |
| 84 | - | 88 | 83 | 65 | 75 | 99 | - | 78 | 98 | 86 | 82 | |
| 83 | 94 | - | 83 | 65 | 75 | 88 | - | 78 | 90 | 96 | 83 | |
| 83 | 86 | 86 | - | 69 | 76 | 83 | - | 77 | 84 | 82 | 99 | |
| 69 | 73 | 72 | 71 | - | 64 | 66 | - | 65 | 69 | 67 | 69 | |
| 97 | 84 | 83 | 83 | 67 | - | 75 | - | 97 | 80 | 77 | 76 | |
| 84 | 100 | 94 | 86 | 73 | 84 | - | - | 78 | 99 | 86 | 82 | |
| 83 | 86 | 86 | 100 | 71 | 83 | 86 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 96 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 68 | 97 | 85 | 85 | - | 82 | 79 | 77 | |
| 84 | 99 | 92 | 87 | 75 | 84 | 99 | 87 | 85 | - | 91 | 84 | |
| 82 | 92 | 96 | 85 | 71 | 81 | 92 | 85 | 83 | 90 | - | 82 | |
| 83 | 87 | 87 | 98 | 71 | 83 | 87 | 98 | 85 | 88 | 85 | - |
Similarity score percentage of IGS of studied nematodes
| IGS | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 68 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 57 | 78 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 57 | 76 | 99 | - | - | - | - | |
| 66 | 47 | 68 | 72 | - | - | - | |
| 93 | 69 | 59 | 58 | 60 | - | - | |
| 15 | 28 | 17 | 15 | 43 | 34 | - |