| Literature DB >> 25678803 |
Manisha R Panchal1, Julia J Scarisbrick1.
Abstract
Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is an umbrella term that encompasses a group of neoplasms that have atypical T-lymphocytes in the skin. Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of CTCL and Sézary syndrome (SS) is the leukemic form. Treatment for CTCL is dependent on the stage of disease and response to previous therapy. Therapy is divided into skin-directed treatment, which tends to be first line for early-stage disease, and systemic therapy, which is reserved for refractory CTCL. Bexarotene is a rexinoid and was licensed in Europe in 2002 for use in patients with advanced disease that have been refractory to a previous systemic treatment. We review the use of bexarotene as monotherapy and in combination with other treatments.Entities:
Keywords: CTCL; cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; retinoid
Year: 2015 PMID: 25678803 PMCID: PMC4322887 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S61308
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Management of common side effects of bexarotene
| Side effects of bexarotene | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Hyperlipidemia | Fibrate therapy for first-line treatment to commence 1 week before bexarotene |
| Aim for TG levels <5.5 | |
| Statin can be added if TG levels remain high despite fibrate | |
| Hypothyroidism | Thyroxine replacement from day 1 of bexarotene treatment |
| Leukopenia | Consider starting G-CSF (granulocyte - colony stimulating factor) and reduce dose by |
| – More common with higher doses | 75 mg if: |
| – Neutrophil count <1.0×109 L−1 | |
| 50% reduction in dose of bexarotene if: | |
| – Neutrophil count <0.5×109 L−1 | |
| Interaction with medications that use the CYP3A4 pathway | – Inducers of CYP3A4 may reduce efficacy of bexarotene |
| – Inhibitors of CYP34A may increase toxicity | |
| Raised CK | If CK >1,000 IU−1: |
| – Due to lipid-lowering agents | – Combination lipid-lowering therapy should be stopped |
| – Statin monotherapy is recommended | |
| Teratogenicity | Contraindicated in pregnancy, like all retinoids |
Abbreviations: CK, creatinine kinase; TG, tryglycerides.
Single and multicenter studies of bexarotene as monotherapy and combination therapy
| Study | Study type n | Stage of disease | Treatment | Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ten-year experience of bexarotene therapy for CTCL | Retrospective cohort study N=37 | Early stage (IA–II): 26 | Majority had previous treatments | None stated | None stated | 75% ORR was observed 83% |
| Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GeMBEX) in the treatment of CTCL | Single arm, multicenter, Phase II trial N=36 | Stage IB–IVB | Gemcitabine (2′2′-diflurodeoxycytidine) and bexarotene combination treatment | Age >18 years | Primary cutaneous CD30+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma | 80% of patients demonstrated a reduction in mSWAT score |
| Efficacy and safety of bexarotene combined with PUVA compared with PUVA treatment alone in stage IB and IIA MF: final results from EORTC Phase III RCT | Randomized Phase III trial | Stage IB–IIA | PUVA + bexarotene vs PUVA alone | Stage IB–IIA disease | None stated | 22% CR was observed in the control group receiving PUVA alone |
| Vorinostat combined with bexarotene for treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: in vitro and Phase I clinical evidence supporting augmentation of retinoic acid receptor/retinoid X receptor activation by histone deacetylase inhibition | Open-label, non-randomized, multicenter Phase I trial N=23 | Stage IB or higher disease previously refractory to systemic therapy | Vorinostat and bexarotene | 18 years of age, CTCL (stage IB or higher) with progressive, persistent, or recurrent disease refractory to at least one systemic therapy (not including bexarotene), life expectancy of at least 3 months persistent disease was defined as a failure to achieve at least 50% disease improvement after at least 3 months of therapy | Uncontrolled hyperlipidemia, excessive alcohol consumption, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, biliary tract disease, hypervitaminosis A, uncontrolled thyroid disease | PR in four patients, unconfirmed response in two patients, and stable disease in 15 patients |
| Evaluation of the efficacy of the combination of oral bexarotene and methotrexate for the treatment of early-stage treatment–refractory CTCL | Retrospective study N=12 | All patients that were treated with combination therapy between 2000–2007 Stage IA–IIB | Bexarotene and methotrexate | None stated | None stated | CR in one patient (8%), seven had a PR (58%), and four had no response (33%) |
Abbreviations: CR, complete response; CTCL, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; EORTC, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; HDAC, histone deacetylase; MF, mycosis fungoides; mSWAT, multiple sequence web viewer and alignment tool; ORR, overall response rate; PR, partial response; PUVA, psoralens and ultraviolet A; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, relative risk.