Literature DB >> 25678725

Recommendations for reporting and flagging of reference limits on pathology reports.

Robert Flatman1, Michael Legg2, Graham Rd Jones3, Peter Graham4, Donna Moore5, Jill Tate6.   

Abstract

Surveys by the RCPA PITUS Project have shown significant variations in report rendering between Australasian Pathology Providers. The same project collected anecdotal evidence that this variation has led to the misunderstanding and misreading of results - a clinical safety issue. Recommendations are given for the rendering of reference limits on pathology reports, determination and rendering of result flags, and the documentation of sub-population partitions for reference intervals. These recommendations apply equally for paper or electronic reporting, but should not limit the use of novel techniques within electronic reports to convey additional meaning. PITUS Working Group 4 will publish draft recommendations for peer review and comment in relation to the above in the second half of 2014.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25678725      PMCID: PMC4310059     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev        ISSN: 0159-8090


  2 in total

1.  The Australian pathology units and terminology standardisation project - an overview.

Authors:  Michael Legg; Christiaan Swanepoel
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2012-08

Review 2.  The theory of reference values: an unfinished symphony.

Authors:  Gerard Siest; Joseph Henny; Ralph Gräsbeck; Peter Wilding; Claude Petitclerc; Josep M Queraltó; Peter Hyltoft Petersen
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.694

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.